Cargando…

Adaptation and validation of a German version of the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) questionnaire

The Strength Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) Questionnaire has been shown to be a reliable instrument for the measurement of its four dimensions perceived organizational support for strengths use, perceived organizational support for deficit correction, strengths use behavior, and deficit correct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lorenz, Timo, Heinitz, Kathrin, Beer, Clemens, van Woerkom, Marianne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33411733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245127
_version_ 1783633384288813056
author Lorenz, Timo
Heinitz, Kathrin
Beer, Clemens
van Woerkom, Marianne
author_facet Lorenz, Timo
Heinitz, Kathrin
Beer, Clemens
van Woerkom, Marianne
author_sort Lorenz, Timo
collection PubMed
description The Strength Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) Questionnaire has been shown to be a reliable instrument for the measurement of its four dimensions perceived organizational support for strengths use, perceived organizational support for deficit correction, strengths use behavior, and deficit correction behavior in the context of organizations. This paper aims to adapt and validate the SUDCO for the German-speaking population (SUDCO-G). Three studies were conducted. Confirmatory factor analyses and correlations with other psychological constructs on the data of three German samples (N(1) = 302; N(2) = 243, N(3) = 295) were performed. The twenty-four item SUDCO-G exhibits the anticipated factorial structure with four factors and an acceptable model fit in all three studies (CFI = .920-.937, TLI = .911-.929, RMSEA = .063-.079, SRMR = 0.52-.075). The associations of the four dimensions to other constructs concur with previous findings (study 2) and the subscales of the SUDCO-G also show positive relations with general strengths use, meaning of work and Psychological Capital (study 3). We conclude that the SUDCO-G is a reliable and valid instrument for the use in the German-speaking population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7790259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77902592021-01-14 Adaptation and validation of a German version of the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) questionnaire Lorenz, Timo Heinitz, Kathrin Beer, Clemens van Woerkom, Marianne PLoS One Research Article The Strength Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) Questionnaire has been shown to be a reliable instrument for the measurement of its four dimensions perceived organizational support for strengths use, perceived organizational support for deficit correction, strengths use behavior, and deficit correction behavior in the context of organizations. This paper aims to adapt and validate the SUDCO for the German-speaking population (SUDCO-G). Three studies were conducted. Confirmatory factor analyses and correlations with other psychological constructs on the data of three German samples (N(1) = 302; N(2) = 243, N(3) = 295) were performed. The twenty-four item SUDCO-G exhibits the anticipated factorial structure with four factors and an acceptable model fit in all three studies (CFI = .920-.937, TLI = .911-.929, RMSEA = .063-.079, SRMR = 0.52-.075). The associations of the four dimensions to other constructs concur with previous findings (study 2) and the subscales of the SUDCO-G also show positive relations with general strengths use, meaning of work and Psychological Capital (study 3). We conclude that the SUDCO-G is a reliable and valid instrument for the use in the German-speaking population. Public Library of Science 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7790259/ /pubmed/33411733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245127 Text en © 2021 Lorenz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lorenz, Timo
Heinitz, Kathrin
Beer, Clemens
van Woerkom, Marianne
Adaptation and validation of a German version of the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) questionnaire
title Adaptation and validation of a German version of the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) questionnaire
title_full Adaptation and validation of a German version of the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) questionnaire
title_fullStr Adaptation and validation of a German version of the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Adaptation and validation of a German version of the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) questionnaire
title_short Adaptation and validation of a German version of the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) questionnaire
title_sort adaptation and validation of a german version of the strengths use and deficit correction (sudco) questionnaire
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33411733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245127
work_keys_str_mv AT lorenztimo adaptationandvalidationofagermanversionofthestrengthsuseanddeficitcorrectionsudcoquestionnaire
AT heinitzkathrin adaptationandvalidationofagermanversionofthestrengthsuseanddeficitcorrectionsudcoquestionnaire
AT beerclemens adaptationandvalidationofagermanversionofthestrengthsuseanddeficitcorrectionsudcoquestionnaire
AT vanwoerkommarianne adaptationandvalidationofagermanversionofthestrengthsuseanddeficitcorrectionsudcoquestionnaire