Cargando…
Adaptation and validation of a German version of the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) questionnaire
The Strength Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) Questionnaire has been shown to be a reliable instrument for the measurement of its four dimensions perceived organizational support for strengths use, perceived organizational support for deficit correction, strengths use behavior, and deficit correct...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33411733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245127 |
_version_ | 1783633384288813056 |
---|---|
author | Lorenz, Timo Heinitz, Kathrin Beer, Clemens van Woerkom, Marianne |
author_facet | Lorenz, Timo Heinitz, Kathrin Beer, Clemens van Woerkom, Marianne |
author_sort | Lorenz, Timo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Strength Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) Questionnaire has been shown to be a reliable instrument for the measurement of its four dimensions perceived organizational support for strengths use, perceived organizational support for deficit correction, strengths use behavior, and deficit correction behavior in the context of organizations. This paper aims to adapt and validate the SUDCO for the German-speaking population (SUDCO-G). Three studies were conducted. Confirmatory factor analyses and correlations with other psychological constructs on the data of three German samples (N(1) = 302; N(2) = 243, N(3) = 295) were performed. The twenty-four item SUDCO-G exhibits the anticipated factorial structure with four factors and an acceptable model fit in all three studies (CFI = .920-.937, TLI = .911-.929, RMSEA = .063-.079, SRMR = 0.52-.075). The associations of the four dimensions to other constructs concur with previous findings (study 2) and the subscales of the SUDCO-G also show positive relations with general strengths use, meaning of work and Psychological Capital (study 3). We conclude that the SUDCO-G is a reliable and valid instrument for the use in the German-speaking population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7790259 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77902592021-01-14 Adaptation and validation of a German version of the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) questionnaire Lorenz, Timo Heinitz, Kathrin Beer, Clemens van Woerkom, Marianne PLoS One Research Article The Strength Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) Questionnaire has been shown to be a reliable instrument for the measurement of its four dimensions perceived organizational support for strengths use, perceived organizational support for deficit correction, strengths use behavior, and deficit correction behavior in the context of organizations. This paper aims to adapt and validate the SUDCO for the German-speaking population (SUDCO-G). Three studies were conducted. Confirmatory factor analyses and correlations with other psychological constructs on the data of three German samples (N(1) = 302; N(2) = 243, N(3) = 295) were performed. The twenty-four item SUDCO-G exhibits the anticipated factorial structure with four factors and an acceptable model fit in all three studies (CFI = .920-.937, TLI = .911-.929, RMSEA = .063-.079, SRMR = 0.52-.075). The associations of the four dimensions to other constructs concur with previous findings (study 2) and the subscales of the SUDCO-G also show positive relations with general strengths use, meaning of work and Psychological Capital (study 3). We conclude that the SUDCO-G is a reliable and valid instrument for the use in the German-speaking population. Public Library of Science 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7790259/ /pubmed/33411733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245127 Text en © 2021 Lorenz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lorenz, Timo Heinitz, Kathrin Beer, Clemens van Woerkom, Marianne Adaptation and validation of a German version of the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) questionnaire |
title | Adaptation and validation of a German version of the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) questionnaire |
title_full | Adaptation and validation of a German version of the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) questionnaire |
title_fullStr | Adaptation and validation of a German version of the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed | Adaptation and validation of a German version of the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) questionnaire |
title_short | Adaptation and validation of a German version of the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) questionnaire |
title_sort | adaptation and validation of a german version of the strengths use and deficit correction (sudco) questionnaire |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33411733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245127 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lorenztimo adaptationandvalidationofagermanversionofthestrengthsuseanddeficitcorrectionsudcoquestionnaire AT heinitzkathrin adaptationandvalidationofagermanversionofthestrengthsuseanddeficitcorrectionsudcoquestionnaire AT beerclemens adaptationandvalidationofagermanversionofthestrengthsuseanddeficitcorrectionsudcoquestionnaire AT vanwoerkommarianne adaptationandvalidationofagermanversionofthestrengthsuseanddeficitcorrectionsudcoquestionnaire |