Cargando…

Speaking Up Against Hierarchy: A Simulation Geared Towards Nursing Students

Background As simulation science continues to advance, the focus previously put on scenario creation and debriefing must now be applied to other components of the learning experience. There is a need to examine the effectiveness of pre-simulation activities and how they relate to the overall simulat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Da Silva, Celina, Peisachovich, Eva, Anyinam, Charles K, Coffey, Sue, Graham, Leslie, Tavangar, Farideh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33425549
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11977
_version_ 1783633397397061632
author Da Silva, Celina
Peisachovich, Eva
Anyinam, Charles K
Coffey, Sue
Graham, Leslie
Tavangar, Farideh
author_facet Da Silva, Celina
Peisachovich, Eva
Anyinam, Charles K
Coffey, Sue
Graham, Leslie
Tavangar, Farideh
author_sort Da Silva, Celina
collection PubMed
description Background As simulation science continues to advance, the focus previously put on scenario creation and debriefing must now be applied to other components of the learning experience. There is a need to examine the effectiveness of pre-simulation activities and how they relate to the overall simulation experience and learning outcomes. However, few randomized controlled trials have been conducted comparing different approaches in the pre-simulation preparatory phase and the impact on learning outcomes. Methods A randomized controlled trial was conducted with undergraduate nursing students (n=83) who were randomized to a traditional paper case study (control group) or an interactive pre-simulation activity (intervention group). The use of the two-challenge rule and Satisfaction and Self Confidence in Learning (SSL) was evaluated. Results The proportion of students who utilized the two-challenge rule in the intervention group was significantly higher than the control group. Results from the two independent-samples Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test showed a significant difference in the median of the total score of the SSL W=2.5, p <0.001, satisfaction W=6.0, p <0.001, and self-confidence W=68.0, p <0.001 in learning between third-year nursing students in the control and intervention groups. Conclusion Our results showed significant differences in the use of the two-challenge rule by students who completed an interactive pre-simulation activity (intervention group) compared to those who completed the paper case study (control group). Additionally, students in the intervention group were more self-confident and satisfied with the entire simulation intervention than the control group. From a pedagogical perspective, this study also emphasizes the need to ground simulations in theory. Moreover, there is value in using progressive frameworks, i.e., revised Medical Research Council (2014) in simulation design and research to ensure high quality. More studies are required to examine the right dosage and type of pre-simulation activity and impact on learning outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7790316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77903162021-01-08 Speaking Up Against Hierarchy: A Simulation Geared Towards Nursing Students Da Silva, Celina Peisachovich, Eva Anyinam, Charles K Coffey, Sue Graham, Leslie Tavangar, Farideh Cureus Other Background As simulation science continues to advance, the focus previously put on scenario creation and debriefing must now be applied to other components of the learning experience. There is a need to examine the effectiveness of pre-simulation activities and how they relate to the overall simulation experience and learning outcomes. However, few randomized controlled trials have been conducted comparing different approaches in the pre-simulation preparatory phase and the impact on learning outcomes. Methods A randomized controlled trial was conducted with undergraduate nursing students (n=83) who were randomized to a traditional paper case study (control group) or an interactive pre-simulation activity (intervention group). The use of the two-challenge rule and Satisfaction and Self Confidence in Learning (SSL) was evaluated. Results The proportion of students who utilized the two-challenge rule in the intervention group was significantly higher than the control group. Results from the two independent-samples Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test showed a significant difference in the median of the total score of the SSL W=2.5, p <0.001, satisfaction W=6.0, p <0.001, and self-confidence W=68.0, p <0.001 in learning between third-year nursing students in the control and intervention groups. Conclusion Our results showed significant differences in the use of the two-challenge rule by students who completed an interactive pre-simulation activity (intervention group) compared to those who completed the paper case study (control group). Additionally, students in the intervention group were more self-confident and satisfied with the entire simulation intervention than the control group. From a pedagogical perspective, this study also emphasizes the need to ground simulations in theory. Moreover, there is value in using progressive frameworks, i.e., revised Medical Research Council (2014) in simulation design and research to ensure high quality. More studies are required to examine the right dosage and type of pre-simulation activity and impact on learning outcomes. Cureus 2020-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7790316/ /pubmed/33425549 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11977 Text en Copyright © 2020, Da Silva et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Other
Da Silva, Celina
Peisachovich, Eva
Anyinam, Charles K
Coffey, Sue
Graham, Leslie
Tavangar, Farideh
Speaking Up Against Hierarchy: A Simulation Geared Towards Nursing Students
title Speaking Up Against Hierarchy: A Simulation Geared Towards Nursing Students
title_full Speaking Up Against Hierarchy: A Simulation Geared Towards Nursing Students
title_fullStr Speaking Up Against Hierarchy: A Simulation Geared Towards Nursing Students
title_full_unstemmed Speaking Up Against Hierarchy: A Simulation Geared Towards Nursing Students
title_short Speaking Up Against Hierarchy: A Simulation Geared Towards Nursing Students
title_sort speaking up against hierarchy: a simulation geared towards nursing students
topic Other
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33425549
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11977
work_keys_str_mv AT dasilvacelina speakingupagainsthierarchyasimulationgearedtowardsnursingstudents
AT peisachovicheva speakingupagainsthierarchyasimulationgearedtowardsnursingstudents
AT anyinamcharlesk speakingupagainsthierarchyasimulationgearedtowardsnursingstudents
AT coffeysue speakingupagainsthierarchyasimulationgearedtowardsnursingstudents
AT grahamleslie speakingupagainsthierarchyasimulationgearedtowardsnursingstudents
AT tavangarfarideh speakingupagainsthierarchyasimulationgearedtowardsnursingstudents