Cargando…
Analysis of viral load in different specimen types and serum antibody levels of COVID-19 patients
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has caused a global pandemic and the death toll is increasing. However, there is no definitive information regarding the type of clinical specimens that is the best for SARS-CoV-2 detection, the antibody levels in patients with different duration of disease, and the relationship...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02693-2 |
_version_ | 1783633404408889344 |
---|---|
author | Li, Ling Tan, Chianru Zeng, Jia Luo, Chen Hu, Shi Peng, Yanke Li, Wenjuan Xie, Zhixiong Ling, Yueming Zhang, Xuejun Deng, E. Xu, Haixia Wang, Jue Xie, Yudi Zhou, Yaling Zhang, Wei Guo, Yong Liu, Zhong |
author_facet | Li, Ling Tan, Chianru Zeng, Jia Luo, Chen Hu, Shi Peng, Yanke Li, Wenjuan Xie, Zhixiong Ling, Yueming Zhang, Xuejun Deng, E. Xu, Haixia Wang, Jue Xie, Yudi Zhou, Yaling Zhang, Wei Guo, Yong Liu, Zhong |
author_sort | Li, Ling |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has caused a global pandemic and the death toll is increasing. However, there is no definitive information regarding the type of clinical specimens that is the best for SARS-CoV-2 detection, the antibody levels in patients with different duration of disease, and the relationship between antibody level and viral load. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swabs, anal swabs, saliva, blood, and urine specimens were collected from patients with a course of disease ranging from 7 to 69 days. Viral load in different specimen types was measured using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Meanwhile, anti-nucleocapsid protein (anti-N) IgM and IgG antibodies and anti-spike protein receptor-binding domain (anti-S-RBD) IgG antibody in all serum samples were tested using ELISA. RESULTS: The positive detection rate in nasopharyngeal swab was the highest (54.05%), followed by anal swab (24.32%), and the positive detection rate in saliva, blood, and urine was 16.22%, 10.81%, and 5.41%, respectively. However, some patients with negative nasopharyngeal swabs had other specimens tested positive. There was no significant correlation between antibody level and days after symptoms onset or viral load. CONCLUSIONS: Other specimens could be positive in patients with negative nasopharyngeal swabs, suggesting that for patients in the recovery period, specimens other than nasopharyngeal swabs should also be tested to avoid false negative results, and anal swabs are recommended. The antibody level had no correlation with days after symptoms onset or the viral load of nasopharyngeal swabs, suggesting that the antibody level may also be affected by other factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7790347 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77903472021-01-08 Analysis of viral load in different specimen types and serum antibody levels of COVID-19 patients Li, Ling Tan, Chianru Zeng, Jia Luo, Chen Hu, Shi Peng, Yanke Li, Wenjuan Xie, Zhixiong Ling, Yueming Zhang, Xuejun Deng, E. Xu, Haixia Wang, Jue Xie, Yudi Zhou, Yaling Zhang, Wei Guo, Yong Liu, Zhong J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has caused a global pandemic and the death toll is increasing. However, there is no definitive information regarding the type of clinical specimens that is the best for SARS-CoV-2 detection, the antibody levels in patients with different duration of disease, and the relationship between antibody level and viral load. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swabs, anal swabs, saliva, blood, and urine specimens were collected from patients with a course of disease ranging from 7 to 69 days. Viral load in different specimen types was measured using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Meanwhile, anti-nucleocapsid protein (anti-N) IgM and IgG antibodies and anti-spike protein receptor-binding domain (anti-S-RBD) IgG antibody in all serum samples were tested using ELISA. RESULTS: The positive detection rate in nasopharyngeal swab was the highest (54.05%), followed by anal swab (24.32%), and the positive detection rate in saliva, blood, and urine was 16.22%, 10.81%, and 5.41%, respectively. However, some patients with negative nasopharyngeal swabs had other specimens tested positive. There was no significant correlation between antibody level and days after symptoms onset or viral load. CONCLUSIONS: Other specimens could be positive in patients with negative nasopharyngeal swabs, suggesting that for patients in the recovery period, specimens other than nasopharyngeal swabs should also be tested to avoid false negative results, and anal swabs are recommended. The antibody level had no correlation with days after symptoms onset or the viral load of nasopharyngeal swabs, suggesting that the antibody level may also be affected by other factors. BioMed Central 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7790347/ /pubmed/33413461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02693-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Li, Ling Tan, Chianru Zeng, Jia Luo, Chen Hu, Shi Peng, Yanke Li, Wenjuan Xie, Zhixiong Ling, Yueming Zhang, Xuejun Deng, E. Xu, Haixia Wang, Jue Xie, Yudi Zhou, Yaling Zhang, Wei Guo, Yong Liu, Zhong Analysis of viral load in different specimen types and serum antibody levels of COVID-19 patients |
title | Analysis of viral load in different specimen types and serum antibody levels of COVID-19 patients |
title_full | Analysis of viral load in different specimen types and serum antibody levels of COVID-19 patients |
title_fullStr | Analysis of viral load in different specimen types and serum antibody levels of COVID-19 patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of viral load in different specimen types and serum antibody levels of COVID-19 patients |
title_short | Analysis of viral load in different specimen types and serum antibody levels of COVID-19 patients |
title_sort | analysis of viral load in different specimen types and serum antibody levels of covid-19 patients |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02693-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liling analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients AT tanchianru analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients AT zengjia analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients AT luochen analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients AT hushi analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients AT pengyanke analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients AT liwenjuan analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients AT xiezhixiong analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients AT lingyueming analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients AT zhangxuejun analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients AT denge analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients AT xuhaixia analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients AT wangjue analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients AT xieyudi analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients AT zhouyaling analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients AT zhangwei analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients AT guoyong analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients AT liuzhong analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients |