Cargando…

Analysis of viral load in different specimen types and serum antibody levels of COVID-19 patients

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has caused a global pandemic and the death toll is increasing. However, there is no definitive information regarding the type of clinical specimens that is the best for SARS-CoV-2 detection, the antibody levels in patients with different duration of disease, and the relationship...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Ling, Tan, Chianru, Zeng, Jia, Luo, Chen, Hu, Shi, Peng, Yanke, Li, Wenjuan, Xie, Zhixiong, Ling, Yueming, Zhang, Xuejun, Deng, E., Xu, Haixia, Wang, Jue, Xie, Yudi, Zhou, Yaling, Zhang, Wei, Guo, Yong, Liu, Zhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02693-2
_version_ 1783633404408889344
author Li, Ling
Tan, Chianru
Zeng, Jia
Luo, Chen
Hu, Shi
Peng, Yanke
Li, Wenjuan
Xie, Zhixiong
Ling, Yueming
Zhang, Xuejun
Deng, E.
Xu, Haixia
Wang, Jue
Xie, Yudi
Zhou, Yaling
Zhang, Wei
Guo, Yong
Liu, Zhong
author_facet Li, Ling
Tan, Chianru
Zeng, Jia
Luo, Chen
Hu, Shi
Peng, Yanke
Li, Wenjuan
Xie, Zhixiong
Ling, Yueming
Zhang, Xuejun
Deng, E.
Xu, Haixia
Wang, Jue
Xie, Yudi
Zhou, Yaling
Zhang, Wei
Guo, Yong
Liu, Zhong
author_sort Li, Ling
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has caused a global pandemic and the death toll is increasing. However, there is no definitive information regarding the type of clinical specimens that is the best for SARS-CoV-2 detection, the antibody levels in patients with different duration of disease, and the relationship between antibody level and viral load. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swabs, anal swabs, saliva, blood, and urine specimens were collected from patients with a course of disease ranging from 7 to 69 days. Viral load in different specimen types was measured using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Meanwhile, anti-nucleocapsid protein (anti-N) IgM and IgG antibodies and anti-spike protein receptor-binding domain (anti-S-RBD) IgG antibody in all serum samples were tested using ELISA. RESULTS: The positive detection rate in nasopharyngeal swab was the highest (54.05%), followed by anal swab (24.32%), and the positive detection rate in saliva, blood, and urine was 16.22%, 10.81%, and 5.41%, respectively. However, some patients with negative nasopharyngeal swabs had other specimens tested positive. There was no significant correlation between antibody level and days after symptoms onset or viral load. CONCLUSIONS: Other specimens could be positive in patients with negative nasopharyngeal swabs, suggesting that for patients in the recovery period, specimens other than nasopharyngeal swabs should also be tested to avoid false negative results, and anal swabs are recommended. The antibody level had no correlation with days after symptoms onset or the viral load of nasopharyngeal swabs, suggesting that the antibody level may also be affected by other factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7790347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77903472021-01-08 Analysis of viral load in different specimen types and serum antibody levels of COVID-19 patients Li, Ling Tan, Chianru Zeng, Jia Luo, Chen Hu, Shi Peng, Yanke Li, Wenjuan Xie, Zhixiong Ling, Yueming Zhang, Xuejun Deng, E. Xu, Haixia Wang, Jue Xie, Yudi Zhou, Yaling Zhang, Wei Guo, Yong Liu, Zhong J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has caused a global pandemic and the death toll is increasing. However, there is no definitive information regarding the type of clinical specimens that is the best for SARS-CoV-2 detection, the antibody levels in patients with different duration of disease, and the relationship between antibody level and viral load. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swabs, anal swabs, saliva, blood, and urine specimens were collected from patients with a course of disease ranging from 7 to 69 days. Viral load in different specimen types was measured using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Meanwhile, anti-nucleocapsid protein (anti-N) IgM and IgG antibodies and anti-spike protein receptor-binding domain (anti-S-RBD) IgG antibody in all serum samples were tested using ELISA. RESULTS: The positive detection rate in nasopharyngeal swab was the highest (54.05%), followed by anal swab (24.32%), and the positive detection rate in saliva, blood, and urine was 16.22%, 10.81%, and 5.41%, respectively. However, some patients with negative nasopharyngeal swabs had other specimens tested positive. There was no significant correlation between antibody level and days after symptoms onset or viral load. CONCLUSIONS: Other specimens could be positive in patients with negative nasopharyngeal swabs, suggesting that for patients in the recovery period, specimens other than nasopharyngeal swabs should also be tested to avoid false negative results, and anal swabs are recommended. The antibody level had no correlation with days after symptoms onset or the viral load of nasopharyngeal swabs, suggesting that the antibody level may also be affected by other factors. BioMed Central 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7790347/ /pubmed/33413461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02693-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Li, Ling
Tan, Chianru
Zeng, Jia
Luo, Chen
Hu, Shi
Peng, Yanke
Li, Wenjuan
Xie, Zhixiong
Ling, Yueming
Zhang, Xuejun
Deng, E.
Xu, Haixia
Wang, Jue
Xie, Yudi
Zhou, Yaling
Zhang, Wei
Guo, Yong
Liu, Zhong
Analysis of viral load in different specimen types and serum antibody levels of COVID-19 patients
title Analysis of viral load in different specimen types and serum antibody levels of COVID-19 patients
title_full Analysis of viral load in different specimen types and serum antibody levels of COVID-19 patients
title_fullStr Analysis of viral load in different specimen types and serum antibody levels of COVID-19 patients
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of viral load in different specimen types and serum antibody levels of COVID-19 patients
title_short Analysis of viral load in different specimen types and serum antibody levels of COVID-19 patients
title_sort analysis of viral load in different specimen types and serum antibody levels of covid-19 patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02693-2
work_keys_str_mv AT liling analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients
AT tanchianru analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients
AT zengjia analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients
AT luochen analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients
AT hushi analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients
AT pengyanke analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients
AT liwenjuan analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients
AT xiezhixiong analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients
AT lingyueming analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients
AT zhangxuejun analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients
AT denge analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients
AT xuhaixia analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients
AT wangjue analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients
AT xieyudi analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients
AT zhouyaling analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients
AT zhangwei analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients
AT guoyong analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients
AT liuzhong analysisofviralloadindifferentspecimentypesandserumantibodylevelsofcovid19patients