Cargando…
What could prevent chronic condition admissions assessed as preventable in rural and metropolitan contexts? An analysis of clinicians’ perspectives from the DaPPHne study
INTRODUCTION: Reducing potentially preventable hospitalisations (PPH) is a priority for health services. This paper describes the factors that clinicians perceived contributed to preventable admissions for angina, diabetes, congestive heart failure (CHF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (CO...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33411717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244313 |
_version_ | 1783633414810763264 |
---|---|
author | Longman, Jo Johnston, Jennifer Ewald, Dan Gilliland, Adrian Burke, Michael Mutonga, Tabeth Passey, Megan |
author_facet | Longman, Jo Johnston, Jennifer Ewald, Dan Gilliland, Adrian Burke, Michael Mutonga, Tabeth Passey, Megan |
author_sort | Longman, Jo |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Reducing potentially preventable hospitalisations (PPH) is a priority for health services. This paper describes the factors that clinicians perceived contributed to preventable admissions for angina, diabetes, congestive heart failure (CHF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and what they considered might have been done in the three months leading up to an admission to prevent it. METHODS: The study was conducted in a rural and a metropolitan health district in NSW, Australia. Expert Panels reviewed detailed case reports to assess preventability. For those admissions identified as preventable, comments from clinicians indicating what they perceived could have made a difference and/or been done differently to prevent each of the preventable admissions were analysed qualitatively. RESULTS: 148 (46%) of 323 admissions were assessed as preventable. Across the two districts, the most commonly identified groups of contributing factors to preventable admissions were: ‘Systems issues: Community based services missing or inadequate or not referred to’; ‘Patient issues: Problems with adherence/self-management’; and ‘Clinician issues: GP care inadequate’. In some instances, important differences drove these groups of factors. For example, in the rural district ‘Systems issues: Community based services missing or inadequate or not referred to’ was largely driven by social and welfare support services missing/inadequate/not referred to, whereas in the metropolitan district it was largely driven by community nursing, allied health, care coordination or integrated care services missing/inadequate/not referred to. Analyses revealed the complexity of system, clinician and patient factors contributing to each admission. Admissions for COPD (rural) and CHF (metropolitan) admissions showed greatest complexity. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: These findings suggest preventability of individual admissions is complex and context specific. There is no single, simple solution likely to reduce PPH. Rather, an approach addressing multiple factors is required. This need for comprehensiveness may explain why many programs seeking to reduce PPH have been unsuccessful. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7790391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77903912021-01-27 What could prevent chronic condition admissions assessed as preventable in rural and metropolitan contexts? An analysis of clinicians’ perspectives from the DaPPHne study Longman, Jo Johnston, Jennifer Ewald, Dan Gilliland, Adrian Burke, Michael Mutonga, Tabeth Passey, Megan PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Reducing potentially preventable hospitalisations (PPH) is a priority for health services. This paper describes the factors that clinicians perceived contributed to preventable admissions for angina, diabetes, congestive heart failure (CHF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and what they considered might have been done in the three months leading up to an admission to prevent it. METHODS: The study was conducted in a rural and a metropolitan health district in NSW, Australia. Expert Panels reviewed detailed case reports to assess preventability. For those admissions identified as preventable, comments from clinicians indicating what they perceived could have made a difference and/or been done differently to prevent each of the preventable admissions were analysed qualitatively. RESULTS: 148 (46%) of 323 admissions were assessed as preventable. Across the two districts, the most commonly identified groups of contributing factors to preventable admissions were: ‘Systems issues: Community based services missing or inadequate or not referred to’; ‘Patient issues: Problems with adherence/self-management’; and ‘Clinician issues: GP care inadequate’. In some instances, important differences drove these groups of factors. For example, in the rural district ‘Systems issues: Community based services missing or inadequate or not referred to’ was largely driven by social and welfare support services missing/inadequate/not referred to, whereas in the metropolitan district it was largely driven by community nursing, allied health, care coordination or integrated care services missing/inadequate/not referred to. Analyses revealed the complexity of system, clinician and patient factors contributing to each admission. Admissions for COPD (rural) and CHF (metropolitan) admissions showed greatest complexity. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: These findings suggest preventability of individual admissions is complex and context specific. There is no single, simple solution likely to reduce PPH. Rather, an approach addressing multiple factors is required. This need for comprehensiveness may explain why many programs seeking to reduce PPH have been unsuccessful. Public Library of Science 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7790391/ /pubmed/33411717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244313 Text en © 2021 Longman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Longman, Jo Johnston, Jennifer Ewald, Dan Gilliland, Adrian Burke, Michael Mutonga, Tabeth Passey, Megan What could prevent chronic condition admissions assessed as preventable in rural and metropolitan contexts? An analysis of clinicians’ perspectives from the DaPPHne study |
title | What could prevent chronic condition admissions assessed as preventable in rural and metropolitan contexts? An analysis of clinicians’ perspectives from the DaPPHne study |
title_full | What could prevent chronic condition admissions assessed as preventable in rural and metropolitan contexts? An analysis of clinicians’ perspectives from the DaPPHne study |
title_fullStr | What could prevent chronic condition admissions assessed as preventable in rural and metropolitan contexts? An analysis of clinicians’ perspectives from the DaPPHne study |
title_full_unstemmed | What could prevent chronic condition admissions assessed as preventable in rural and metropolitan contexts? An analysis of clinicians’ perspectives from the DaPPHne study |
title_short | What could prevent chronic condition admissions assessed as preventable in rural and metropolitan contexts? An analysis of clinicians’ perspectives from the DaPPHne study |
title_sort | what could prevent chronic condition admissions assessed as preventable in rural and metropolitan contexts? an analysis of clinicians’ perspectives from the dapphne study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33411717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244313 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT longmanjo whatcouldpreventchronicconditionadmissionsassessedaspreventableinruralandmetropolitancontextsananalysisofcliniciansperspectivesfromthedapphnestudy AT johnstonjennifer whatcouldpreventchronicconditionadmissionsassessedaspreventableinruralandmetropolitancontextsananalysisofcliniciansperspectivesfromthedapphnestudy AT ewalddan whatcouldpreventchronicconditionadmissionsassessedaspreventableinruralandmetropolitancontextsananalysisofcliniciansperspectivesfromthedapphnestudy AT gillilandadrian whatcouldpreventchronicconditionadmissionsassessedaspreventableinruralandmetropolitancontextsananalysisofcliniciansperspectivesfromthedapphnestudy AT burkemichael whatcouldpreventchronicconditionadmissionsassessedaspreventableinruralandmetropolitancontextsananalysisofcliniciansperspectivesfromthedapphnestudy AT mutongatabeth whatcouldpreventchronicconditionadmissionsassessedaspreventableinruralandmetropolitancontextsananalysisofcliniciansperspectivesfromthedapphnestudy AT passeymegan whatcouldpreventchronicconditionadmissionsassessedaspreventableinruralandmetropolitancontextsananalysisofcliniciansperspectivesfromthedapphnestudy |