Cargando…

Combining botanical collections and ecological data to better describe plant community diversity

In this age of rapid biodiversity loss, we must continue to refine our approaches to describing variation in life on Earth. Combining knowledge and research tools from multiple disciplines is one way to better describe complex natural systems. Understanding plant community diversity requires documen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alba, Christina, Levy, Richard, Hufft, Rebecca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33411770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244982
_version_ 1783633419418206208
author Alba, Christina
Levy, Richard
Hufft, Rebecca
author_facet Alba, Christina
Levy, Richard
Hufft, Rebecca
author_sort Alba, Christina
collection PubMed
description In this age of rapid biodiversity loss, we must continue to refine our approaches to describing variation in life on Earth. Combining knowledge and research tools from multiple disciplines is one way to better describe complex natural systems. Understanding plant community diversity requires documenting both pattern and process. We must first know which species exist, and where (i.e., taxonomic and biogeographic patterns), before we can determine why they exist there (i.e., ecological and evolutionary processes). Floristic botanists often use collections-based approaches to elucidate biodiversity patterns, while plant ecologists use hypothesis-driven statistical approaches to describe underlying processes. Because of these different disciplinary histories and research goals, floristic botanists and plant ecologists often remain siloed in their work. Here, using a case study from an urban greenway in Colorado, USA, we illustrate that the collections-based, opportunistic sampling of floristic botanists is highly complementary to the transect- or plot-based sampling of plant ecologists. We found that floristic sampling captured a community species pool four times larger than that captured using ecological transects, with rarefaction and non-parametric species estimation indicating that it would be prohibitive to capture the “true” community species pool if constrained to sampling within transects. We further illustrate that the discrepancy in species pool size between approaches led to a different interpretation of the greenway’s ecological condition in some cases (e.g., transects missed uncommon cultivated species escaping from nearby gardens) but not others (e.g., plant species distributions among functional groups were similar between species pools). Finally, we show that while using transects to estimate plant relative abundances necessarily trades off with a fuller assessment of the species pool, it is an indispensable indicator of ecosystem health, as evidenced by three non-native grasses contributing to 50% of plant cover along the highly modified urban greenway. We suggest that actively fostering collaborations between floristic botanists and ecologists can create new insights into the maintenance of species diversity at the community scale.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7790410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77904102021-01-27 Combining botanical collections and ecological data to better describe plant community diversity Alba, Christina Levy, Richard Hufft, Rebecca PLoS One Research Article In this age of rapid biodiversity loss, we must continue to refine our approaches to describing variation in life on Earth. Combining knowledge and research tools from multiple disciplines is one way to better describe complex natural systems. Understanding plant community diversity requires documenting both pattern and process. We must first know which species exist, and where (i.e., taxonomic and biogeographic patterns), before we can determine why they exist there (i.e., ecological and evolutionary processes). Floristic botanists often use collections-based approaches to elucidate biodiversity patterns, while plant ecologists use hypothesis-driven statistical approaches to describe underlying processes. Because of these different disciplinary histories and research goals, floristic botanists and plant ecologists often remain siloed in their work. Here, using a case study from an urban greenway in Colorado, USA, we illustrate that the collections-based, opportunistic sampling of floristic botanists is highly complementary to the transect- or plot-based sampling of plant ecologists. We found that floristic sampling captured a community species pool four times larger than that captured using ecological transects, with rarefaction and non-parametric species estimation indicating that it would be prohibitive to capture the “true” community species pool if constrained to sampling within transects. We further illustrate that the discrepancy in species pool size between approaches led to a different interpretation of the greenway’s ecological condition in some cases (e.g., transects missed uncommon cultivated species escaping from nearby gardens) but not others (e.g., plant species distributions among functional groups were similar between species pools). Finally, we show that while using transects to estimate plant relative abundances necessarily trades off with a fuller assessment of the species pool, it is an indispensable indicator of ecosystem health, as evidenced by three non-native grasses contributing to 50% of plant cover along the highly modified urban greenway. We suggest that actively fostering collaborations between floristic botanists and ecologists can create new insights into the maintenance of species diversity at the community scale. Public Library of Science 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7790410/ /pubmed/33411770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244982 Text en © 2021 Alba et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Alba, Christina
Levy, Richard
Hufft, Rebecca
Combining botanical collections and ecological data to better describe plant community diversity
title Combining botanical collections and ecological data to better describe plant community diversity
title_full Combining botanical collections and ecological data to better describe plant community diversity
title_fullStr Combining botanical collections and ecological data to better describe plant community diversity
title_full_unstemmed Combining botanical collections and ecological data to better describe plant community diversity
title_short Combining botanical collections and ecological data to better describe plant community diversity
title_sort combining botanical collections and ecological data to better describe plant community diversity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33411770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244982
work_keys_str_mv AT albachristina combiningbotanicalcollectionsandecologicaldatatobetterdescribeplantcommunitydiversity
AT levyrichard combiningbotanicalcollectionsandecologicaldatatobetterdescribeplantcommunitydiversity
AT hufftrebecca combiningbotanicalcollectionsandecologicaldatatobetterdescribeplantcommunitydiversity