Cargando…

COVID-19 epidemic prediction and the impact of public health interventions: A review of COVID-19 epidemic models

The coronavirus disease outbreak of 2019 (COVID-19) has been spreading rapidly to all corners of the word, in a very complex manner. A key research focus is in predicting the development trend of COVID-19 scientifically through mathematical modelling. We conducted a systematic review of epidemic pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiang, Yue, Jia, Yonghong, Chen, Linlin, Guo, Lei, Shu, Bizhen, Long, Enshen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: KeAi Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33437897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idm.2021.01.001
_version_ 1783633427175571456
author Xiang, Yue
Jia, Yonghong
Chen, Linlin
Guo, Lei
Shu, Bizhen
Long, Enshen
author_facet Xiang, Yue
Jia, Yonghong
Chen, Linlin
Guo, Lei
Shu, Bizhen
Long, Enshen
author_sort Xiang, Yue
collection PubMed
description The coronavirus disease outbreak of 2019 (COVID-19) has been spreading rapidly to all corners of the word, in a very complex manner. A key research focus is in predicting the development trend of COVID-19 scientifically through mathematical modelling. We conducted a systematic review of epidemic prediction models of COVID-19 and the public health intervention strategies by searching the Web of Science database. 55 studies of the COVID-19 epidemic model were reviewed systematically. It was found that the COVID-19 epidemic models were different in the model type, acquisition method, hypothesis and distribution of key input parameters. Most studies used the gamma distribution to describe the key time period of COVID-19 infection, and some studies used the lognormal distribution, the Erlang distribution, and the Weibull distribution. The setting ranges of the incubation period, serial interval, infectious period and generation time were 4.9–7 days, 4.41–8.4 days, 2.3–10 days and 4.4–7.5 days, respectively, and more than half of the incubation periods were set to 5.1 or 5.2 days. Most models assumed that the latent period was consistent with the incubation period. Some models assumed that asymptomatic infections were infectious or pre-symptomatic transmission was possible, which overestimated the value of R0. For the prediction differences under different public health strategies, the most significant effect was in travel restrictions. There were different studies on the impact of contact tracking and social isolation, but it was considered that improving the quarantine rate and reporting rate, and the use of protective face mask were essential for epidemic prevention and control. The input epidemiological parameters of the prediction models had significant differences in the prediction of the severity of the epidemic spread. Therefore, prevention and control institutions should be cautious when formulating public health strategies by based on the prediction results of mathematical models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7790451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher KeAi Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77904512021-01-08 COVID-19 epidemic prediction and the impact of public health interventions: A review of COVID-19 epidemic models Xiang, Yue Jia, Yonghong Chen, Linlin Guo, Lei Shu, Bizhen Long, Enshen Infect Dis Model Special issue on Modelling and Forecasting the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Transmission; Edited by Prof. Carlos Castillo-Chavez, Prof. Gerardo Chowell-Puente, Prof. Ping Yan, Prof. Jianhong Wu The coronavirus disease outbreak of 2019 (COVID-19) has been spreading rapidly to all corners of the word, in a very complex manner. A key research focus is in predicting the development trend of COVID-19 scientifically through mathematical modelling. We conducted a systematic review of epidemic prediction models of COVID-19 and the public health intervention strategies by searching the Web of Science database. 55 studies of the COVID-19 epidemic model were reviewed systematically. It was found that the COVID-19 epidemic models were different in the model type, acquisition method, hypothesis and distribution of key input parameters. Most studies used the gamma distribution to describe the key time period of COVID-19 infection, and some studies used the lognormal distribution, the Erlang distribution, and the Weibull distribution. The setting ranges of the incubation period, serial interval, infectious period and generation time were 4.9–7 days, 4.41–8.4 days, 2.3–10 days and 4.4–7.5 days, respectively, and more than half of the incubation periods were set to 5.1 or 5.2 days. Most models assumed that the latent period was consistent with the incubation period. Some models assumed that asymptomatic infections were infectious or pre-symptomatic transmission was possible, which overestimated the value of R0. For the prediction differences under different public health strategies, the most significant effect was in travel restrictions. There were different studies on the impact of contact tracking and social isolation, but it was considered that improving the quarantine rate and reporting rate, and the use of protective face mask were essential for epidemic prevention and control. The input epidemiological parameters of the prediction models had significant differences in the prediction of the severity of the epidemic spread. Therefore, prevention and control institutions should be cautious when formulating public health strategies by based on the prediction results of mathematical models. KeAi Publishing 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7790451/ /pubmed/33437897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idm.2021.01.001 Text en © 2021 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Special issue on Modelling and Forecasting the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Transmission; Edited by Prof. Carlos Castillo-Chavez, Prof. Gerardo Chowell-Puente, Prof. Ping Yan, Prof. Jianhong Wu
Xiang, Yue
Jia, Yonghong
Chen, Linlin
Guo, Lei
Shu, Bizhen
Long, Enshen
COVID-19 epidemic prediction and the impact of public health interventions: A review of COVID-19 epidemic models
title COVID-19 epidemic prediction and the impact of public health interventions: A review of COVID-19 epidemic models
title_full COVID-19 epidemic prediction and the impact of public health interventions: A review of COVID-19 epidemic models
title_fullStr COVID-19 epidemic prediction and the impact of public health interventions: A review of COVID-19 epidemic models
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 epidemic prediction and the impact of public health interventions: A review of COVID-19 epidemic models
title_short COVID-19 epidemic prediction and the impact of public health interventions: A review of COVID-19 epidemic models
title_sort covid-19 epidemic prediction and the impact of public health interventions: a review of covid-19 epidemic models
topic Special issue on Modelling and Forecasting the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Transmission; Edited by Prof. Carlos Castillo-Chavez, Prof. Gerardo Chowell-Puente, Prof. Ping Yan, Prof. Jianhong Wu
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33437897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idm.2021.01.001
work_keys_str_mv AT xiangyue covid19epidemicpredictionandtheimpactofpublichealthinterventionsareviewofcovid19epidemicmodels
AT jiayonghong covid19epidemicpredictionandtheimpactofpublichealthinterventionsareviewofcovid19epidemicmodels
AT chenlinlin covid19epidemicpredictionandtheimpactofpublichealthinterventionsareviewofcovid19epidemicmodels
AT guolei covid19epidemicpredictionandtheimpactofpublichealthinterventionsareviewofcovid19epidemicmodels
AT shubizhen covid19epidemicpredictionandtheimpactofpublichealthinterventionsareviewofcovid19epidemicmodels
AT longenshen covid19epidemicpredictionandtheimpactofpublichealthinterventionsareviewofcovid19epidemicmodels