Cargando…

Disentangling effects of disturbance severity and frequency: Does bioindication really work?

Ecological disturbances are recognized as a crucial factor influencing the attributes of ecological communities. Depending on the specific adaptation or life cycle, plant species show different responses to disturbances of different magnitudes. Herben et al. (Journal of Vegetation Science, 27, 628–6...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pielech, Remigiusz, Czortek, Patryk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33437427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7019
_version_ 1783633469174185984
author Pielech, Remigiusz
Czortek, Patryk
author_facet Pielech, Remigiusz
Czortek, Patryk
author_sort Pielech, Remigiusz
collection PubMed
description Ecological disturbances are recognized as a crucial factor influencing the attributes of ecological communities. Depending on the specific adaptation or life cycle, plant species show different responses to disturbances of different magnitudes. Herben et al. (Journal of Vegetation Science, 27, 628–636) proposed six disturbance indicator values (DIVs) that describe the niches of Central‐European plant species along gradients of disturbance frequency and severity. Here, we ask if the DIVs can be used in community ecology for bioindication of disturbance regime? We used a dataset of riparian forests sampled within mountain catchments (the Sudetes, SW Poland). As the regime of disturbance is driven by changes in floods from the spring toward the mouth, we calculated the position of every plot along longitudinal (upstream–downstream) gradient and used it as a proxy for the disturbance severity and frequency. We then calculated the community‐weighted means (CWMs) for each of the six indices for each plot and analyzed whether these indices reflected the position of the plots along the rivers. We expected an increase in the severity indices and a decrease in the frequency indices downstream along the rivers. Moreover, we analyzed relationships between disturbance indices and species optima along longitudinal gradient. Surprisingly, means for all analyzed indices increased along the rivers. Severity indices showed the strongest association with the longitudinal gradient. The disturbance severity index for herbs was the only index that differed significantly among species with different responses along longitudinal gradient. On these results, we identified a strong correlation between the severity and frequency indices as the main problem. We conclude that the DIVs have considerable applicative potential; however, the determination of ecological niches separately for disturbance severity and frequency is difficult because different components interact to shape the realized niche of each species. All analyzed indices encompass different attributes of the disturbance regime including both severity and frequency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7790635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77906352021-01-11 Disentangling effects of disturbance severity and frequency: Does bioindication really work? Pielech, Remigiusz Czortek, Patryk Ecol Evol Original Research Ecological disturbances are recognized as a crucial factor influencing the attributes of ecological communities. Depending on the specific adaptation or life cycle, plant species show different responses to disturbances of different magnitudes. Herben et al. (Journal of Vegetation Science, 27, 628–636) proposed six disturbance indicator values (DIVs) that describe the niches of Central‐European plant species along gradients of disturbance frequency and severity. Here, we ask if the DIVs can be used in community ecology for bioindication of disturbance regime? We used a dataset of riparian forests sampled within mountain catchments (the Sudetes, SW Poland). As the regime of disturbance is driven by changes in floods from the spring toward the mouth, we calculated the position of every plot along longitudinal (upstream–downstream) gradient and used it as a proxy for the disturbance severity and frequency. We then calculated the community‐weighted means (CWMs) for each of the six indices for each plot and analyzed whether these indices reflected the position of the plots along the rivers. We expected an increase in the severity indices and a decrease in the frequency indices downstream along the rivers. Moreover, we analyzed relationships between disturbance indices and species optima along longitudinal gradient. Surprisingly, means for all analyzed indices increased along the rivers. Severity indices showed the strongest association with the longitudinal gradient. The disturbance severity index for herbs was the only index that differed significantly among species with different responses along longitudinal gradient. On these results, we identified a strong correlation between the severity and frequency indices as the main problem. We conclude that the DIVs have considerable applicative potential; however, the determination of ecological niches separately for disturbance severity and frequency is difficult because different components interact to shape the realized niche of each species. All analyzed indices encompass different attributes of the disturbance regime including both severity and frequency. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7790635/ /pubmed/33437427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7019 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Pielech, Remigiusz
Czortek, Patryk
Disentangling effects of disturbance severity and frequency: Does bioindication really work?
title Disentangling effects of disturbance severity and frequency: Does bioindication really work?
title_full Disentangling effects of disturbance severity and frequency: Does bioindication really work?
title_fullStr Disentangling effects of disturbance severity and frequency: Does bioindication really work?
title_full_unstemmed Disentangling effects of disturbance severity and frequency: Does bioindication really work?
title_short Disentangling effects of disturbance severity and frequency: Does bioindication really work?
title_sort disentangling effects of disturbance severity and frequency: does bioindication really work?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33437427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7019
work_keys_str_mv AT pielechremigiusz disentanglingeffectsofdisturbanceseverityandfrequencydoesbioindicationreallywork
AT czortekpatryk disentanglingeffectsofdisturbanceseverityandfrequencydoesbioindicationreallywork