Cargando…

Clinical impact of genomic testing in patients with suspected monogenic kidney disease

PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic yield and clinical impact of exome sequencing (ES) in patients with suspected monogenic kidney disease. METHODS: We performed clinically accredited singleton ES in a prospectively ascertained cohort of 204 patients assessed in multidisciplinary renal genetics cli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jayasinghe, Kushani, Stark, Zornitza, Kerr, Peter G., Gaff, Clara, Martyn, Melissa, Whitlam, John, Creighton, Belinda, Donaldson, Elizabeth, Hunter, Matthew, Jarmolowicz, Anna, Johnstone, Lilian, Krzesinski, Emma, Lunke, Sebastian, Lynch, Elly, Nicholls, Kathleen, Patel, Chirag, Prawer, Yael, Ryan, Jessica, See, Emily J., Talbot, Andrew, Trainer, Alison, Tytherleigh, Rigan, Valente, Giulia, Wallis, Mathew, Wardrop, Louise, West, Kirsty H., White, Susan M., Wilkins, Ella, Mallett, Andrew J., Quinlan, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32939031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-020-00963-4
_version_ 1783633488110419968
author Jayasinghe, Kushani
Stark, Zornitza
Kerr, Peter G.
Gaff, Clara
Martyn, Melissa
Whitlam, John
Creighton, Belinda
Donaldson, Elizabeth
Hunter, Matthew
Jarmolowicz, Anna
Johnstone, Lilian
Krzesinski, Emma
Lunke, Sebastian
Lynch, Elly
Nicholls, Kathleen
Patel, Chirag
Prawer, Yael
Ryan, Jessica
See, Emily J.
Talbot, Andrew
Trainer, Alison
Tytherleigh, Rigan
Valente, Giulia
Wallis, Mathew
Wardrop, Louise
West, Kirsty H.
White, Susan M.
Wilkins, Ella
Mallett, Andrew J.
Quinlan, Catherine
author_facet Jayasinghe, Kushani
Stark, Zornitza
Kerr, Peter G.
Gaff, Clara
Martyn, Melissa
Whitlam, John
Creighton, Belinda
Donaldson, Elizabeth
Hunter, Matthew
Jarmolowicz, Anna
Johnstone, Lilian
Krzesinski, Emma
Lunke, Sebastian
Lynch, Elly
Nicholls, Kathleen
Patel, Chirag
Prawer, Yael
Ryan, Jessica
See, Emily J.
Talbot, Andrew
Trainer, Alison
Tytherleigh, Rigan
Valente, Giulia
Wallis, Mathew
Wardrop, Louise
West, Kirsty H.
White, Susan M.
Wilkins, Ella
Mallett, Andrew J.
Quinlan, Catherine
author_sort Jayasinghe, Kushani
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic yield and clinical impact of exome sequencing (ES) in patients with suspected monogenic kidney disease. METHODS: We performed clinically accredited singleton ES in a prospectively ascertained cohort of 204 patients assessed in multidisciplinary renal genetics clinics at four tertiary hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. RESULTS: ES identified a molecular diagnosis in 80 (39%) patients, encompassing 35 distinct genetic disorders. Younger age at presentation was independently associated with an ES diagnosis (p < 0.001). Of those diagnosed, 31/80 (39%) had a change in their clinical diagnosis. ES diagnosis was considered to have contributed to management in 47/80 (59%), including negating the need for diagnostic renal biopsy in 10/80 (13%), changing surveillance in 35/80 (44%), and changing the treatment plan in 16/80 (20%). In cases with no change to management in the proband, the ES result had implications for the management of family members in 26/33 (79%). Cascade testing was subsequently offered to 40/80 families (50%). CONCLUSION: In this pragmatic pediatric and adult cohort with suspected monogenic kidney disease, ES had high diagnostic and clinical utility. Our findings, including predictors of positive diagnosis, can be used to guide clinical practice and health service design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7790755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77907552021-01-15 Clinical impact of genomic testing in patients with suspected monogenic kidney disease Jayasinghe, Kushani Stark, Zornitza Kerr, Peter G. Gaff, Clara Martyn, Melissa Whitlam, John Creighton, Belinda Donaldson, Elizabeth Hunter, Matthew Jarmolowicz, Anna Johnstone, Lilian Krzesinski, Emma Lunke, Sebastian Lynch, Elly Nicholls, Kathleen Patel, Chirag Prawer, Yael Ryan, Jessica See, Emily J. Talbot, Andrew Trainer, Alison Tytherleigh, Rigan Valente, Giulia Wallis, Mathew Wardrop, Louise West, Kirsty H. White, Susan M. Wilkins, Ella Mallett, Andrew J. Quinlan, Catherine Genet Med Article PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic yield and clinical impact of exome sequencing (ES) in patients with suspected monogenic kidney disease. METHODS: We performed clinically accredited singleton ES in a prospectively ascertained cohort of 204 patients assessed in multidisciplinary renal genetics clinics at four tertiary hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. RESULTS: ES identified a molecular diagnosis in 80 (39%) patients, encompassing 35 distinct genetic disorders. Younger age at presentation was independently associated with an ES diagnosis (p < 0.001). Of those diagnosed, 31/80 (39%) had a change in their clinical diagnosis. ES diagnosis was considered to have contributed to management in 47/80 (59%), including negating the need for diagnostic renal biopsy in 10/80 (13%), changing surveillance in 35/80 (44%), and changing the treatment plan in 16/80 (20%). In cases with no change to management in the proband, the ES result had implications for the management of family members in 26/33 (79%). Cascade testing was subsequently offered to 40/80 families (50%). CONCLUSION: In this pragmatic pediatric and adult cohort with suspected monogenic kidney disease, ES had high diagnostic and clinical utility. Our findings, including predictors of positive diagnosis, can be used to guide clinical practice and health service design. Nature Publishing Group US 2020-09-17 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7790755/ /pubmed/32939031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-020-00963-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, and provide a link to the Creative Commons license. You do not have permission under this license to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Jayasinghe, Kushani
Stark, Zornitza
Kerr, Peter G.
Gaff, Clara
Martyn, Melissa
Whitlam, John
Creighton, Belinda
Donaldson, Elizabeth
Hunter, Matthew
Jarmolowicz, Anna
Johnstone, Lilian
Krzesinski, Emma
Lunke, Sebastian
Lynch, Elly
Nicholls, Kathleen
Patel, Chirag
Prawer, Yael
Ryan, Jessica
See, Emily J.
Talbot, Andrew
Trainer, Alison
Tytherleigh, Rigan
Valente, Giulia
Wallis, Mathew
Wardrop, Louise
West, Kirsty H.
White, Susan M.
Wilkins, Ella
Mallett, Andrew J.
Quinlan, Catherine
Clinical impact of genomic testing in patients with suspected monogenic kidney disease
title Clinical impact of genomic testing in patients with suspected monogenic kidney disease
title_full Clinical impact of genomic testing in patients with suspected monogenic kidney disease
title_fullStr Clinical impact of genomic testing in patients with suspected monogenic kidney disease
title_full_unstemmed Clinical impact of genomic testing in patients with suspected monogenic kidney disease
title_short Clinical impact of genomic testing in patients with suspected monogenic kidney disease
title_sort clinical impact of genomic testing in patients with suspected monogenic kidney disease
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32939031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-020-00963-4
work_keys_str_mv AT jayasinghekushani clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT starkzornitza clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT kerrpeterg clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT gaffclara clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT martynmelissa clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT whitlamjohn clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT creightonbelinda clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT donaldsonelizabeth clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT huntermatthew clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT jarmolowiczanna clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT johnstonelilian clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT krzesinskiemma clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT lunkesebastian clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT lynchelly clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT nichollskathleen clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT patelchirag clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT praweryael clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT ryanjessica clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT seeemilyj clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT talbotandrew clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT traineralison clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT tytherleighrigan clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT valentegiulia clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT wallismathew clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT wardroplouise clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT westkirstyh clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT whitesusanm clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT wilkinsella clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT mallettandrewj clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease
AT quinlancatherine clinicalimpactofgenomictestinginpatientswithsuspectedmonogenickidneydisease