Cargando…

SICI during changing brain states: Differences in methodology can lead to different conclusions

BACKGROUND: Short-latency intracortical inhibition (SICI) is extensively used to probe GABAergic inhibitory mechanisms in M1. Task-related changes in SICI are presumed to reflect changes in the central excitability of GABAergic pathways. Usually, the level of SICI is evaluated using a single intensi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ibáñez, Jaime, Spampinato, Danny A., Paraneetharan, Varshini, Rothwell, John C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31711879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2019.11.002
_version_ 1783633489559552000
author Ibáñez, Jaime
Spampinato, Danny A.
Paraneetharan, Varshini
Rothwell, John C.
author_facet Ibáñez, Jaime
Spampinato, Danny A.
Paraneetharan, Varshini
Rothwell, John C.
author_sort Ibáñez, Jaime
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Short-latency intracortical inhibition (SICI) is extensively used to probe GABAergic inhibitory mechanisms in M1. Task-related changes in SICI are presumed to reflect changes in the central excitability of GABAergic pathways. Usually, the level of SICI is evaluated using a single intensity of conditioning stimulus so that inhibition can be compared in different brain states. OBJECTIVE: Here, we show that this approach may sometimes be inadequate since distinct conclusions can be drawn if a different CS intensity is used. METHODS: We measured SICI using a range of CS intensities at rest and during a warned simple reaction time task. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that SICI changes that occurred during the task could be either larger or smaller than at rest depending on the intensity of the CS. These findings indicate that careful interpretation of results are needed when a single intensity of CS is used to measure task-related physiological changes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7790761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77907612021-01-14 SICI during changing brain states: Differences in methodology can lead to different conclusions Ibáñez, Jaime Spampinato, Danny A. Paraneetharan, Varshini Rothwell, John C. Brain Stimul Article BACKGROUND: Short-latency intracortical inhibition (SICI) is extensively used to probe GABAergic inhibitory mechanisms in M1. Task-related changes in SICI are presumed to reflect changes in the central excitability of GABAergic pathways. Usually, the level of SICI is evaluated using a single intensity of conditioning stimulus so that inhibition can be compared in different brain states. OBJECTIVE: Here, we show that this approach may sometimes be inadequate since distinct conclusions can be drawn if a different CS intensity is used. METHODS: We measured SICI using a range of CS intensities at rest and during a warned simple reaction time task. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that SICI changes that occurred during the task could be either larger or smaller than at rest depending on the intensity of the CS. These findings indicate that careful interpretation of results are needed when a single intensity of CS is used to measure task-related physiological changes. Elsevier 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7790761/ /pubmed/31711879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2019.11.002 Text en © 2019 Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ibáñez, Jaime
Spampinato, Danny A.
Paraneetharan, Varshini
Rothwell, John C.
SICI during changing brain states: Differences in methodology can lead to different conclusions
title SICI during changing brain states: Differences in methodology can lead to different conclusions
title_full SICI during changing brain states: Differences in methodology can lead to different conclusions
title_fullStr SICI during changing brain states: Differences in methodology can lead to different conclusions
title_full_unstemmed SICI during changing brain states: Differences in methodology can lead to different conclusions
title_short SICI during changing brain states: Differences in methodology can lead to different conclusions
title_sort sici during changing brain states: differences in methodology can lead to different conclusions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31711879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2019.11.002
work_keys_str_mv AT ibanezjaime siciduringchangingbrainstatesdifferencesinmethodologycanleadtodifferentconclusions
AT spampinatodannya siciduringchangingbrainstatesdifferencesinmethodologycanleadtodifferentconclusions
AT paraneetharanvarshini siciduringchangingbrainstatesdifferencesinmethodologycanleadtodifferentconclusions
AT rothwelljohnc siciduringchangingbrainstatesdifferencesinmethodologycanleadtodifferentconclusions