Cargando…

The incidences of metachronous multiple gastric cancer after various types of gastrectomy: analysis of data from a nationwide Japanese survey

BACKGROUND: The incidence of metachronous multiple gastric cancer (MMGC) after gastrectomy remains unclear. This study evaluated the incidences of MMGC according to specific gastrectomy types, including pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG), proximal gastrectomy (PG), and function-preserving gastrect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kinami, Shinichi, Aizawa, Masaki, Yamashita, Hiroharu, Kumagai, Koshi, Kamiya, Satoshi, Toda, Makoto, Takahata, Takaomi, Fujisaki, Muneharu, Miyamoto, Hiroshi, Kusanagi, Hiroshi, Kobayashi, Kenta, Washio, Marie, Hosoda, Kei, Kosaka, Takeo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32780194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01104-1
_version_ 1783633493745467392
author Kinami, Shinichi
Aizawa, Masaki
Yamashita, Hiroharu
Kumagai, Koshi
Kamiya, Satoshi
Toda, Makoto
Takahata, Takaomi
Fujisaki, Muneharu
Miyamoto, Hiroshi
Kusanagi, Hiroshi
Kobayashi, Kenta
Washio, Marie
Hosoda, Kei
Kosaka, Takeo
author_facet Kinami, Shinichi
Aizawa, Masaki
Yamashita, Hiroharu
Kumagai, Koshi
Kamiya, Satoshi
Toda, Makoto
Takahata, Takaomi
Fujisaki, Muneharu
Miyamoto, Hiroshi
Kusanagi, Hiroshi
Kobayashi, Kenta
Washio, Marie
Hosoda, Kei
Kosaka, Takeo
author_sort Kinami, Shinichi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The incidence of metachronous multiple gastric cancer (MMGC) after gastrectomy remains unclear. This study evaluated the incidences of MMGC according to specific gastrectomy types, including pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG), proximal gastrectomy (PG), and function-preserving gastrectomy (FPG), which was categorized as segmental gastrectomy and local resection. METHODS: We conducted a questionnaire survey of the Japanese Society for Gastro-Surgical Pathophysiology members, who were asked to report their institutional numbers of radical gastrectomy cases for cancer between 2003 and 2012. The cases were categorized according to whether the remnant stomach’s status was followed for > 5 years, confirmation of MMGC, time to diagnosis, and treatment for MMGC. We calculated the “precise incidence” of MMGC by dividing the number of MMGC cases by the number of cases in which the status of remnant stomach was followed up for > 5 years. RESULTS: The responses identified 33,731 cases of gastrectomy. The precise incidences of MMGC were 2.35% after distal gastrectomy (DG), 3.01% after PPG, 6.28% after PG (p < 0.001), and 8.21% after FPG (p < 0.001). A substantial proportion of MMGCs (36.4%) was found at 5 years after the initial surgery. The rates of MMGC treatment using endoscopic submucosal dissection were 31% after DG, 28.6% after PPG, 50.8% after PG (p < 0.001), and 67.9% after FPG (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of MMGC was 2.4% after DG, and higher incidences were observed for larger stomach remnants. However, the proportion of cases in which MMGC could be treated using endoscopic submucosal dissection was significantly higher after PG and FPG than after DG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7790780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77907802021-01-11 The incidences of metachronous multiple gastric cancer after various types of gastrectomy: analysis of data from a nationwide Japanese survey Kinami, Shinichi Aizawa, Masaki Yamashita, Hiroharu Kumagai, Koshi Kamiya, Satoshi Toda, Makoto Takahata, Takaomi Fujisaki, Muneharu Miyamoto, Hiroshi Kusanagi, Hiroshi Kobayashi, Kenta Washio, Marie Hosoda, Kei Kosaka, Takeo Gastric Cancer Original Article BACKGROUND: The incidence of metachronous multiple gastric cancer (MMGC) after gastrectomy remains unclear. This study evaluated the incidences of MMGC according to specific gastrectomy types, including pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG), proximal gastrectomy (PG), and function-preserving gastrectomy (FPG), which was categorized as segmental gastrectomy and local resection. METHODS: We conducted a questionnaire survey of the Japanese Society for Gastro-Surgical Pathophysiology members, who were asked to report their institutional numbers of radical gastrectomy cases for cancer between 2003 and 2012. The cases were categorized according to whether the remnant stomach’s status was followed for > 5 years, confirmation of MMGC, time to diagnosis, and treatment for MMGC. We calculated the “precise incidence” of MMGC by dividing the number of MMGC cases by the number of cases in which the status of remnant stomach was followed up for > 5 years. RESULTS: The responses identified 33,731 cases of gastrectomy. The precise incidences of MMGC were 2.35% after distal gastrectomy (DG), 3.01% after PPG, 6.28% after PG (p < 0.001), and 8.21% after FPG (p < 0.001). A substantial proportion of MMGCs (36.4%) was found at 5 years after the initial surgery. The rates of MMGC treatment using endoscopic submucosal dissection were 31% after DG, 28.6% after PPG, 50.8% after PG (p < 0.001), and 67.9% after FPG (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of MMGC was 2.4% after DG, and higher incidences were observed for larger stomach remnants. However, the proportion of cases in which MMGC could be treated using endoscopic submucosal dissection was significantly higher after PG and FPG than after DG. Springer Singapore 2020-07-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7790780/ /pubmed/32780194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01104-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kinami, Shinichi
Aizawa, Masaki
Yamashita, Hiroharu
Kumagai, Koshi
Kamiya, Satoshi
Toda, Makoto
Takahata, Takaomi
Fujisaki, Muneharu
Miyamoto, Hiroshi
Kusanagi, Hiroshi
Kobayashi, Kenta
Washio, Marie
Hosoda, Kei
Kosaka, Takeo
The incidences of metachronous multiple gastric cancer after various types of gastrectomy: analysis of data from a nationwide Japanese survey
title The incidences of metachronous multiple gastric cancer after various types of gastrectomy: analysis of data from a nationwide Japanese survey
title_full The incidences of metachronous multiple gastric cancer after various types of gastrectomy: analysis of data from a nationwide Japanese survey
title_fullStr The incidences of metachronous multiple gastric cancer after various types of gastrectomy: analysis of data from a nationwide Japanese survey
title_full_unstemmed The incidences of metachronous multiple gastric cancer after various types of gastrectomy: analysis of data from a nationwide Japanese survey
title_short The incidences of metachronous multiple gastric cancer after various types of gastrectomy: analysis of data from a nationwide Japanese survey
title_sort incidences of metachronous multiple gastric cancer after various types of gastrectomy: analysis of data from a nationwide japanese survey
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32780194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01104-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kinamishinichi theincidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT aizawamasaki theincidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT yamashitahiroharu theincidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT kumagaikoshi theincidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT kamiyasatoshi theincidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT todamakoto theincidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT takahatatakaomi theincidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT fujisakimuneharu theincidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT miyamotohiroshi theincidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT kusanagihiroshi theincidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT kobayashikenta theincidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT washiomarie theincidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT hosodakei theincidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT kosakatakeo theincidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT kinamishinichi incidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT aizawamasaki incidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT yamashitahiroharu incidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT kumagaikoshi incidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT kamiyasatoshi incidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT todamakoto incidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT takahatatakaomi incidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT fujisakimuneharu incidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT miyamotohiroshi incidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT kusanagihiroshi incidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT kobayashikenta incidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT washiomarie incidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT hosodakei incidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey
AT kosakatakeo incidencesofmetachronousmultiplegastriccanceraftervarioustypesofgastrectomyanalysisofdatafromanationwidejapanesesurvey