Cargando…

Quantitative Evidence Synthesis Methods for the Assessment of the Effectiveness of Treatment Sequences for Clinical and Economic Decision Making: A Review and Taxonomy of Simplifying Assumptions

Sequential use of alternative treatments for chronic conditions represents a complex intervention pathway; previous treatment and patient characteristics affect both the choice and effectiveness of subsequent treatments. This paper critically explores the methods for quantitative evidence synthesis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lewis, Ruth A., Hughes, Dyfrig, Sutton, Alex J., Wilkinson, Clare
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33242191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00980-w
_version_ 1783633493987688448
author Lewis, Ruth A.
Hughes, Dyfrig
Sutton, Alex J.
Wilkinson, Clare
author_facet Lewis, Ruth A.
Hughes, Dyfrig
Sutton, Alex J.
Wilkinson, Clare
author_sort Lewis, Ruth A.
collection PubMed
description Sequential use of alternative treatments for chronic conditions represents a complex intervention pathway; previous treatment and patient characteristics affect both the choice and effectiveness of subsequent treatments. This paper critically explores the methods for quantitative evidence synthesis of the effectiveness of sequential treatment options within a health technology assessment (HTA) or similar process. It covers methods for developing summary estimates of clinical effectiveness or the clinical inputs for the cost-effectiveness assessment and can encompass any disease condition. A comprehensive review of current approaches is presented, which considers meta-analytic methods for assessing the clinical effectiveness of treatment sequences and decision-analytic modelling approaches used to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment sequences. Estimating the effectiveness of a sequence of treatments is not straightforward or trivial and is severely hampered by the limitations of the evidence base. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of sequences were often absent or very limited. In the absence of sufficient RCTs of whole sequences, there is no single best way to evaluate treatment sequences; however, some approaches could be re-used or adapted, sharing ideas across different disease conditions. Each has advantages and disadvantages, and is influenced by the evidence available, extent of treatment sequences (number of treatment lines or permutations), and complexity of the decision problem. Due to the scarcity of data, modelling studies applied simplifying assumptions to data on discrete treatments. A taxonomy for all possible assumptions was developed, providing a unique resource to aid the critique of existing decision-analytic models. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40273-020-00980-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7790782
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77907822021-01-11 Quantitative Evidence Synthesis Methods for the Assessment of the Effectiveness of Treatment Sequences for Clinical and Economic Decision Making: A Review and Taxonomy of Simplifying Assumptions Lewis, Ruth A. Hughes, Dyfrig Sutton, Alex J. Wilkinson, Clare Pharmacoeconomics Review Article Sequential use of alternative treatments for chronic conditions represents a complex intervention pathway; previous treatment and patient characteristics affect both the choice and effectiveness of subsequent treatments. This paper critically explores the methods for quantitative evidence synthesis of the effectiveness of sequential treatment options within a health technology assessment (HTA) or similar process. It covers methods for developing summary estimates of clinical effectiveness or the clinical inputs for the cost-effectiveness assessment and can encompass any disease condition. A comprehensive review of current approaches is presented, which considers meta-analytic methods for assessing the clinical effectiveness of treatment sequences and decision-analytic modelling approaches used to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment sequences. Estimating the effectiveness of a sequence of treatments is not straightforward or trivial and is severely hampered by the limitations of the evidence base. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of sequences were often absent or very limited. In the absence of sufficient RCTs of whole sequences, there is no single best way to evaluate treatment sequences; however, some approaches could be re-used or adapted, sharing ideas across different disease conditions. Each has advantages and disadvantages, and is influenced by the evidence available, extent of treatment sequences (number of treatment lines or permutations), and complexity of the decision problem. Due to the scarcity of data, modelling studies applied simplifying assumptions to data on discrete treatments. A taxonomy for all possible assumptions was developed, providing a unique resource to aid the critique of existing decision-analytic models. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40273-020-00980-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-11-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7790782/ /pubmed/33242191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00980-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review Article
Lewis, Ruth A.
Hughes, Dyfrig
Sutton, Alex J.
Wilkinson, Clare
Quantitative Evidence Synthesis Methods for the Assessment of the Effectiveness of Treatment Sequences for Clinical and Economic Decision Making: A Review and Taxonomy of Simplifying Assumptions
title Quantitative Evidence Synthesis Methods for the Assessment of the Effectiveness of Treatment Sequences for Clinical and Economic Decision Making: A Review and Taxonomy of Simplifying Assumptions
title_full Quantitative Evidence Synthesis Methods for the Assessment of the Effectiveness of Treatment Sequences for Clinical and Economic Decision Making: A Review and Taxonomy of Simplifying Assumptions
title_fullStr Quantitative Evidence Synthesis Methods for the Assessment of the Effectiveness of Treatment Sequences for Clinical and Economic Decision Making: A Review and Taxonomy of Simplifying Assumptions
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Evidence Synthesis Methods for the Assessment of the Effectiveness of Treatment Sequences for Clinical and Economic Decision Making: A Review and Taxonomy of Simplifying Assumptions
title_short Quantitative Evidence Synthesis Methods for the Assessment of the Effectiveness of Treatment Sequences for Clinical and Economic Decision Making: A Review and Taxonomy of Simplifying Assumptions
title_sort quantitative evidence synthesis methods for the assessment of the effectiveness of treatment sequences for clinical and economic decision making: a review and taxonomy of simplifying assumptions
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33242191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00980-w
work_keys_str_mv AT lewisrutha quantitativeevidencesynthesismethodsfortheassessmentoftheeffectivenessoftreatmentsequencesforclinicalandeconomicdecisionmakingareviewandtaxonomyofsimplifyingassumptions
AT hughesdyfrig quantitativeevidencesynthesismethodsfortheassessmentoftheeffectivenessoftreatmentsequencesforclinicalandeconomicdecisionmakingareviewandtaxonomyofsimplifyingassumptions
AT suttonalexj quantitativeevidencesynthesismethodsfortheassessmentoftheeffectivenessoftreatmentsequencesforclinicalandeconomicdecisionmakingareviewandtaxonomyofsimplifyingassumptions
AT wilkinsonclare quantitativeevidencesynthesismethodsfortheassessmentoftheeffectivenessoftreatmentsequencesforclinicalandeconomicdecisionmakingareviewandtaxonomyofsimplifyingassumptions