Cargando…
One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays
To compare the 1-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate and resin composite CAD/CAM onlay restorations. Twenty patients that required two restorations in posterior teeth, with at least one cusp to be covered, received two onlays. One was made with IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar-Vivadent) and the ot...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32705420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00539-3 |
_version_ | 1783633494450110464 |
---|---|
author | Souza, Joana Fuentes, Mª Victoria Baena, Eugenia Ceballos, Laura |
author_facet | Souza, Joana Fuentes, Mª Victoria Baena, Eugenia Ceballos, Laura |
author_sort | Souza, Joana |
collection | PubMed |
description | To compare the 1-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate and resin composite CAD/CAM onlay restorations. Twenty patients that required two restorations in posterior teeth, with at least one cusp to be covered, received two onlays. One was made with IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar-Vivadent) and the other with Lava Ultimate (3M Oral Care). Two blind observers evaluated the restorations at baseline and 1 year after the onlays were cemented, according to FDI criteria. At each recall, digital photographs, bite-wing radiographs and impressions of the restorations were taken for SEM evaluation of the interface. Results were analyzed by Mann–Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests (p < 0.05). At baseline and in the 1-year recall, both CAD/CAM materials exhibited excellent results in most criteria with similar esthetic, functional and biological properties (p > 0.05). However, deterioration in surface lustre (p = 0.020) and color match/translucency (p = 0.039) were detected for IPS e.max CAD onlays after 1-year. Under SEM evaluation, there were no statistically differences in micromorphological criteria at baseline nor after a year between IPS e.max CAD and Lava Ultimate onlays. Conclusion: After 1 year of clinical service IPS e.max CAD and Lava Ultimate onlays showed a similar clinical performance that needs to be confirmed in long-term evaluations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7790784 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77907842021-01-11 One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays Souza, Joana Fuentes, Mª Victoria Baena, Eugenia Ceballos, Laura Odontology Original Article To compare the 1-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate and resin composite CAD/CAM onlay restorations. Twenty patients that required two restorations in posterior teeth, with at least one cusp to be covered, received two onlays. One was made with IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar-Vivadent) and the other with Lava Ultimate (3M Oral Care). Two blind observers evaluated the restorations at baseline and 1 year after the onlays were cemented, according to FDI criteria. At each recall, digital photographs, bite-wing radiographs and impressions of the restorations were taken for SEM evaluation of the interface. Results were analyzed by Mann–Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests (p < 0.05). At baseline and in the 1-year recall, both CAD/CAM materials exhibited excellent results in most criteria with similar esthetic, functional and biological properties (p > 0.05). However, deterioration in surface lustre (p = 0.020) and color match/translucency (p = 0.039) were detected for IPS e.max CAD onlays after 1-year. Under SEM evaluation, there were no statistically differences in micromorphological criteria at baseline nor after a year between IPS e.max CAD and Lava Ultimate onlays. Conclusion: After 1 year of clinical service IPS e.max CAD and Lava Ultimate onlays showed a similar clinical performance that needs to be confirmed in long-term evaluations. Springer Singapore 2020-07-23 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7790784/ /pubmed/32705420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00539-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Souza, Joana Fuentes, Mª Victoria Baena, Eugenia Ceballos, Laura One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays |
title | One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays |
title_full | One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays |
title_fullStr | One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays |
title_full_unstemmed | One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays |
title_short | One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays |
title_sort | one-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite cad/cam onlays |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32705420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00539-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT souzajoana oneyearclinicalperformanceoflithiumdisilicateversusresincompositecadcamonlays AT fuentesmavictoria oneyearclinicalperformanceoflithiumdisilicateversusresincompositecadcamonlays AT baenaeugenia oneyearclinicalperformanceoflithiumdisilicateversusresincompositecadcamonlays AT ceballoslaura oneyearclinicalperformanceoflithiumdisilicateversusresincompositecadcamonlays |