Cargando…

One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays

To compare the 1-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate and resin composite CAD/CAM onlay restorations. Twenty patients that required two restorations in posterior teeth, with at least one cusp to be covered, received two onlays. One was made with IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar-Vivadent) and the ot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Souza, Joana, Fuentes, Mª Victoria, Baena, Eugenia, Ceballos, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32705420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00539-3
_version_ 1783633494450110464
author Souza, Joana
Fuentes, Mª Victoria
Baena, Eugenia
Ceballos, Laura
author_facet Souza, Joana
Fuentes, Mª Victoria
Baena, Eugenia
Ceballos, Laura
author_sort Souza, Joana
collection PubMed
description To compare the 1-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate and resin composite CAD/CAM onlay restorations. Twenty patients that required two restorations in posterior teeth, with at least one cusp to be covered, received two onlays. One was made with IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar-Vivadent) and the other with Lava Ultimate (3M Oral Care). Two blind observers evaluated the restorations at baseline and 1 year after the onlays were cemented, according to FDI criteria. At each recall, digital photographs, bite-wing radiographs and impressions of the restorations were taken for SEM evaluation of the interface. Results were analyzed by Mann–Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests (p < 0.05). At baseline and in the 1-year recall, both CAD/CAM materials exhibited excellent results in most criteria with similar esthetic, functional and biological properties (p > 0.05). However, deterioration in surface lustre (p = 0.020) and color match/translucency (p = 0.039) were detected for IPS e.max CAD onlays after 1-year. Under SEM evaluation, there were no statistically differences in micromorphological criteria at baseline nor after a year between IPS e.max CAD and Lava Ultimate onlays. Conclusion: After 1 year of clinical service IPS e.max CAD and Lava Ultimate onlays showed a similar clinical performance that needs to be confirmed in long-term evaluations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7790784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77907842021-01-11 One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays Souza, Joana Fuentes, Mª Victoria Baena, Eugenia Ceballos, Laura Odontology Original Article To compare the 1-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate and resin composite CAD/CAM onlay restorations. Twenty patients that required two restorations in posterior teeth, with at least one cusp to be covered, received two onlays. One was made with IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar-Vivadent) and the other with Lava Ultimate (3M Oral Care). Two blind observers evaluated the restorations at baseline and 1 year after the onlays were cemented, according to FDI criteria. At each recall, digital photographs, bite-wing radiographs and impressions of the restorations were taken for SEM evaluation of the interface. Results were analyzed by Mann–Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests (p < 0.05). At baseline and in the 1-year recall, both CAD/CAM materials exhibited excellent results in most criteria with similar esthetic, functional and biological properties (p > 0.05). However, deterioration in surface lustre (p = 0.020) and color match/translucency (p = 0.039) were detected for IPS e.max CAD onlays after 1-year. Under SEM evaluation, there were no statistically differences in micromorphological criteria at baseline nor after a year between IPS e.max CAD and Lava Ultimate onlays. Conclusion: After 1 year of clinical service IPS e.max CAD and Lava Ultimate onlays showed a similar clinical performance that needs to be confirmed in long-term evaluations. Springer Singapore 2020-07-23 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7790784/ /pubmed/32705420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00539-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Souza, Joana
Fuentes, Mª Victoria
Baena, Eugenia
Ceballos, Laura
One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays
title One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays
title_full One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays
title_fullStr One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays
title_full_unstemmed One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays
title_short One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays
title_sort one-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite cad/cam onlays
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32705420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00539-3
work_keys_str_mv AT souzajoana oneyearclinicalperformanceoflithiumdisilicateversusresincompositecadcamonlays
AT fuentesmavictoria oneyearclinicalperformanceoflithiumdisilicateversusresincompositecadcamonlays
AT baenaeugenia oneyearclinicalperformanceoflithiumdisilicateversusresincompositecadcamonlays
AT ceballoslaura oneyearclinicalperformanceoflithiumdisilicateversusresincompositecadcamonlays