Cargando…
Smile esthetic evaluation of mucogingival reconstructive surgery
To assess the difference in smile esthetic impact of Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) with or without the adjunct of a collagen matrix (CMX) used as root coverage procedures. Subjects with esthetic demands showing multiple upper gingival recessions of at least 2 mm, without interproximal attachment los...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32772215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00544-6 |
_version_ | 1783633494915678208 |
---|---|
author | Rotundo, Roberto Genzano, Luigi Nieri, Michele Covani, Ugo Peñarrocha-Oltra, David Peñarrocha-Diago, Miguel |
author_facet | Rotundo, Roberto Genzano, Luigi Nieri, Michele Covani, Ugo Peñarrocha-Oltra, David Peñarrocha-Diago, Miguel |
author_sort | Rotundo, Roberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | To assess the difference in smile esthetic impact of Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) with or without the adjunct of a collagen matrix (CMX) used as root coverage procedures. Subjects with esthetic demands showing multiple upper gingival recessions of at least 2 mm, without interproximal attachment loss and cervical abrasion no more than 1 mm were recruited and randomized to CAF plus CMX or CAF alone. The Smile Esthetic Index (SEI) was adopted to quantify the quality of the smile recorded at baseline and 12 months after treatment for each treatment group. In addition, between group difference in the SEI was calculated. 24 Patients were treated and analysed. At baseline, mean gingival recession depths were 2.3 ± 0.7 mm for Test group and 2.6 ± 1.0 mm for Control group. After 1 year, the residual recession depth was 0.3 ± 0.4 mm in the CAF + CMX group and 0.6 ± 0.3 mm in the control group. The SEI at baseline was 8.1 ± 1.0 and 7.9 ± 0.7 for Test and Control group, respectively. The between groups difference at 12 months in SEI was 0.4 (95% C.I. − 0.0 to 0.8, P = 0.0697). Twelve months after treatment, CAF + CMX provided a similar SEI compared to CAF alone and the adjunct of a collagen matrix did not show a different impact on the smile esthetic appearance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7790786 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77907862021-01-11 Smile esthetic evaluation of mucogingival reconstructive surgery Rotundo, Roberto Genzano, Luigi Nieri, Michele Covani, Ugo Peñarrocha-Oltra, David Peñarrocha-Diago, Miguel Odontology Original Article To assess the difference in smile esthetic impact of Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) with or without the adjunct of a collagen matrix (CMX) used as root coverage procedures. Subjects with esthetic demands showing multiple upper gingival recessions of at least 2 mm, without interproximal attachment loss and cervical abrasion no more than 1 mm were recruited and randomized to CAF plus CMX or CAF alone. The Smile Esthetic Index (SEI) was adopted to quantify the quality of the smile recorded at baseline and 12 months after treatment for each treatment group. In addition, between group difference in the SEI was calculated. 24 Patients were treated and analysed. At baseline, mean gingival recession depths were 2.3 ± 0.7 mm for Test group and 2.6 ± 1.0 mm for Control group. After 1 year, the residual recession depth was 0.3 ± 0.4 mm in the CAF + CMX group and 0.6 ± 0.3 mm in the control group. The SEI at baseline was 8.1 ± 1.0 and 7.9 ± 0.7 for Test and Control group, respectively. The between groups difference at 12 months in SEI was 0.4 (95% C.I. − 0.0 to 0.8, P = 0.0697). Twelve months after treatment, CAF + CMX provided a similar SEI compared to CAF alone and the adjunct of a collagen matrix did not show a different impact on the smile esthetic appearance. Springer Singapore 2020-08-09 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7790786/ /pubmed/32772215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00544-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rotundo, Roberto Genzano, Luigi Nieri, Michele Covani, Ugo Peñarrocha-Oltra, David Peñarrocha-Diago, Miguel Smile esthetic evaluation of mucogingival reconstructive surgery |
title | Smile esthetic evaluation of mucogingival reconstructive surgery |
title_full | Smile esthetic evaluation of mucogingival reconstructive surgery |
title_fullStr | Smile esthetic evaluation of mucogingival reconstructive surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Smile esthetic evaluation of mucogingival reconstructive surgery |
title_short | Smile esthetic evaluation of mucogingival reconstructive surgery |
title_sort | smile esthetic evaluation of mucogingival reconstructive surgery |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32772215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00544-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rotundoroberto smileestheticevaluationofmucogingivalreconstructivesurgery AT genzanoluigi smileestheticevaluationofmucogingivalreconstructivesurgery AT nierimichele smileestheticevaluationofmucogingivalreconstructivesurgery AT covaniugo smileestheticevaluationofmucogingivalreconstructivesurgery AT penarrochaoltradavid smileestheticevaluationofmucogingivalreconstructivesurgery AT penarrochadiagomiguel smileestheticevaluationofmucogingivalreconstructivesurgery |