Cargando…

The Relative Importance of Education and Criminal Justice Costs and Benefits in Economic Evaluations: A Best–Worst Scaling Experiment

OBJECTIVES: Mental and behavioural disorders (MBDs) and interventions targeting MBDs lead to costs and cost savings in the healthcare sector, but also in other sectors. The latter are referred to as intersectoral costs and benefits (ICBs). Interventions targeting MBDs often lead to ICBs in the educa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pokhilenko, Irina, Janssen, Luca M. M., Hiligsmann, Mickael, Evers, Silvia M. A. A., Drost, Ruben M. W. A., Paulus, Aggie T. G., Bremmers, Leonarda G. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33026633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00966-8
_version_ 1783633497723764736
author Pokhilenko, Irina
Janssen, Luca M. M.
Hiligsmann, Mickael
Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
Drost, Ruben M. W. A.
Paulus, Aggie T. G.
Bremmers, Leonarda G. M.
author_facet Pokhilenko, Irina
Janssen, Luca M. M.
Hiligsmann, Mickael
Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
Drost, Ruben M. W. A.
Paulus, Aggie T. G.
Bremmers, Leonarda G. M.
author_sort Pokhilenko, Irina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Mental and behavioural disorders (MBDs) and interventions targeting MBDs lead to costs and cost savings in the healthcare sector, but also in other sectors. The latter are referred to as intersectoral costs and benefits (ICBs). Interventions targeting MBDs often lead to ICBs in the education and criminal justice sectors, yet these are rarely included in economic evaluations. This study aimed to investigate the attitudes held by health economists and health technology assessment experts towards education and criminal justice ICBs in economic evaluations and to quantify the relative importance of these ICBs in the context of MBDs. METHODS: An online survey containing open-ended questions and two best–worst scaling object case studies was conducted in order to prioritise a list of 20 education ICBs and 20 criminal justice ICBs. Mean relative importance scores for each ICB were generated using hierarchical Bayes analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-nine experts completed the survey. The majority of the respondents (68%) reported that ICBs were relevant, but only a few (32%) included them in economic evaluations. The most important education ICBs were “special education school attendance”, “absenteeism from school”, and “reduced school attainment”. The most important criminal justice ICBs were “decreased chance of committing a crime as a consequence/effect of mental health programmes/interventions”, “jail and prison expenditures”, and “long-term pain and suffering of victims/victimisation”. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified the most important education and criminal justice ICBs for economic evaluations of interventions targeting MBDs and suggests that it could be relevant to include these ICBs in economic evaluations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40273-020-00966-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7790798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77907982021-01-11 The Relative Importance of Education and Criminal Justice Costs and Benefits in Economic Evaluations: A Best–Worst Scaling Experiment Pokhilenko, Irina Janssen, Luca M. M. Hiligsmann, Mickael Evers, Silvia M. A. A. Drost, Ruben M. W. A. Paulus, Aggie T. G. Bremmers, Leonarda G. M. Pharmacoeconomics Original Research Article OBJECTIVES: Mental and behavioural disorders (MBDs) and interventions targeting MBDs lead to costs and cost savings in the healthcare sector, but also in other sectors. The latter are referred to as intersectoral costs and benefits (ICBs). Interventions targeting MBDs often lead to ICBs in the education and criminal justice sectors, yet these are rarely included in economic evaluations. This study aimed to investigate the attitudes held by health economists and health technology assessment experts towards education and criminal justice ICBs in economic evaluations and to quantify the relative importance of these ICBs in the context of MBDs. METHODS: An online survey containing open-ended questions and two best–worst scaling object case studies was conducted in order to prioritise a list of 20 education ICBs and 20 criminal justice ICBs. Mean relative importance scores for each ICB were generated using hierarchical Bayes analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-nine experts completed the survey. The majority of the respondents (68%) reported that ICBs were relevant, but only a few (32%) included them in economic evaluations. The most important education ICBs were “special education school attendance”, “absenteeism from school”, and “reduced school attainment”. The most important criminal justice ICBs were “decreased chance of committing a crime as a consequence/effect of mental health programmes/interventions”, “jail and prison expenditures”, and “long-term pain and suffering of victims/victimisation”. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified the most important education and criminal justice ICBs for economic evaluations of interventions targeting MBDs and suggests that it could be relevant to include these ICBs in economic evaluations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40273-020-00966-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-10-07 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7790798/ /pubmed/33026633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00966-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Pokhilenko, Irina
Janssen, Luca M. M.
Hiligsmann, Mickael
Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
Drost, Ruben M. W. A.
Paulus, Aggie T. G.
Bremmers, Leonarda G. M.
The Relative Importance of Education and Criminal Justice Costs and Benefits in Economic Evaluations: A Best–Worst Scaling Experiment
title The Relative Importance of Education and Criminal Justice Costs and Benefits in Economic Evaluations: A Best–Worst Scaling Experiment
title_full The Relative Importance of Education and Criminal Justice Costs and Benefits in Economic Evaluations: A Best–Worst Scaling Experiment
title_fullStr The Relative Importance of Education and Criminal Justice Costs and Benefits in Economic Evaluations: A Best–Worst Scaling Experiment
title_full_unstemmed The Relative Importance of Education and Criminal Justice Costs and Benefits in Economic Evaluations: A Best–Worst Scaling Experiment
title_short The Relative Importance of Education and Criminal Justice Costs and Benefits in Economic Evaluations: A Best–Worst Scaling Experiment
title_sort relative importance of education and criminal justice costs and benefits in economic evaluations: a best–worst scaling experiment
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33026633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00966-8
work_keys_str_mv AT pokhilenkoirina therelativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment
AT janssenlucamm therelativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment
AT hiligsmannmickael therelativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment
AT everssilviamaa therelativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment
AT drostrubenmwa therelativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment
AT paulusaggietg therelativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment
AT bremmersleonardagm therelativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment
AT pokhilenkoirina relativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment
AT janssenlucamm relativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment
AT hiligsmannmickael relativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment
AT everssilviamaa relativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment
AT drostrubenmwa relativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment
AT paulusaggietg relativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment
AT bremmersleonardagm relativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment