Cargando…
The Relative Importance of Education and Criminal Justice Costs and Benefits in Economic Evaluations: A Best–Worst Scaling Experiment
OBJECTIVES: Mental and behavioural disorders (MBDs) and interventions targeting MBDs lead to costs and cost savings in the healthcare sector, but also in other sectors. The latter are referred to as intersectoral costs and benefits (ICBs). Interventions targeting MBDs often lead to ICBs in the educa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33026633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00966-8 |
_version_ | 1783633497723764736 |
---|---|
author | Pokhilenko, Irina Janssen, Luca M. M. Hiligsmann, Mickael Evers, Silvia M. A. A. Drost, Ruben M. W. A. Paulus, Aggie T. G. Bremmers, Leonarda G. M. |
author_facet | Pokhilenko, Irina Janssen, Luca M. M. Hiligsmann, Mickael Evers, Silvia M. A. A. Drost, Ruben M. W. A. Paulus, Aggie T. G. Bremmers, Leonarda G. M. |
author_sort | Pokhilenko, Irina |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Mental and behavioural disorders (MBDs) and interventions targeting MBDs lead to costs and cost savings in the healthcare sector, but also in other sectors. The latter are referred to as intersectoral costs and benefits (ICBs). Interventions targeting MBDs often lead to ICBs in the education and criminal justice sectors, yet these are rarely included in economic evaluations. This study aimed to investigate the attitudes held by health economists and health technology assessment experts towards education and criminal justice ICBs in economic evaluations and to quantify the relative importance of these ICBs in the context of MBDs. METHODS: An online survey containing open-ended questions and two best–worst scaling object case studies was conducted in order to prioritise a list of 20 education ICBs and 20 criminal justice ICBs. Mean relative importance scores for each ICB were generated using hierarchical Bayes analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-nine experts completed the survey. The majority of the respondents (68%) reported that ICBs were relevant, but only a few (32%) included them in economic evaluations. The most important education ICBs were “special education school attendance”, “absenteeism from school”, and “reduced school attainment”. The most important criminal justice ICBs were “decreased chance of committing a crime as a consequence/effect of mental health programmes/interventions”, “jail and prison expenditures”, and “long-term pain and suffering of victims/victimisation”. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified the most important education and criminal justice ICBs for economic evaluations of interventions targeting MBDs and suggests that it could be relevant to include these ICBs in economic evaluations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40273-020-00966-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7790798 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77907982021-01-11 The Relative Importance of Education and Criminal Justice Costs and Benefits in Economic Evaluations: A Best–Worst Scaling Experiment Pokhilenko, Irina Janssen, Luca M. M. Hiligsmann, Mickael Evers, Silvia M. A. A. Drost, Ruben M. W. A. Paulus, Aggie T. G. Bremmers, Leonarda G. M. Pharmacoeconomics Original Research Article OBJECTIVES: Mental and behavioural disorders (MBDs) and interventions targeting MBDs lead to costs and cost savings in the healthcare sector, but also in other sectors. The latter are referred to as intersectoral costs and benefits (ICBs). Interventions targeting MBDs often lead to ICBs in the education and criminal justice sectors, yet these are rarely included in economic evaluations. This study aimed to investigate the attitudes held by health economists and health technology assessment experts towards education and criminal justice ICBs in economic evaluations and to quantify the relative importance of these ICBs in the context of MBDs. METHODS: An online survey containing open-ended questions and two best–worst scaling object case studies was conducted in order to prioritise a list of 20 education ICBs and 20 criminal justice ICBs. Mean relative importance scores for each ICB were generated using hierarchical Bayes analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-nine experts completed the survey. The majority of the respondents (68%) reported that ICBs were relevant, but only a few (32%) included them in economic evaluations. The most important education ICBs were “special education school attendance”, “absenteeism from school”, and “reduced school attainment”. The most important criminal justice ICBs were “decreased chance of committing a crime as a consequence/effect of mental health programmes/interventions”, “jail and prison expenditures”, and “long-term pain and suffering of victims/victimisation”. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified the most important education and criminal justice ICBs for economic evaluations of interventions targeting MBDs and suggests that it could be relevant to include these ICBs in economic evaluations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40273-020-00966-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-10-07 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7790798/ /pubmed/33026633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00966-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Pokhilenko, Irina Janssen, Luca M. M. Hiligsmann, Mickael Evers, Silvia M. A. A. Drost, Ruben M. W. A. Paulus, Aggie T. G. Bremmers, Leonarda G. M. The Relative Importance of Education and Criminal Justice Costs and Benefits in Economic Evaluations: A Best–Worst Scaling Experiment |
title | The Relative Importance of Education and Criminal Justice Costs and Benefits in Economic Evaluations: A Best–Worst Scaling Experiment |
title_full | The Relative Importance of Education and Criminal Justice Costs and Benefits in Economic Evaluations: A Best–Worst Scaling Experiment |
title_fullStr | The Relative Importance of Education and Criminal Justice Costs and Benefits in Economic Evaluations: A Best–Worst Scaling Experiment |
title_full_unstemmed | The Relative Importance of Education and Criminal Justice Costs and Benefits in Economic Evaluations: A Best–Worst Scaling Experiment |
title_short | The Relative Importance of Education and Criminal Justice Costs and Benefits in Economic Evaluations: A Best–Worst Scaling Experiment |
title_sort | relative importance of education and criminal justice costs and benefits in economic evaluations: a best–worst scaling experiment |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33026633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00966-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pokhilenkoirina therelativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment AT janssenlucamm therelativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment AT hiligsmannmickael therelativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment AT everssilviamaa therelativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment AT drostrubenmwa therelativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment AT paulusaggietg therelativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment AT bremmersleonardagm therelativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment AT pokhilenkoirina relativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment AT janssenlucamm relativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment AT hiligsmannmickael relativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment AT everssilviamaa relativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment AT drostrubenmwa relativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment AT paulusaggietg relativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment AT bremmersleonardagm relativeimportanceofeducationandcriminaljusticecostsandbenefitsineconomicevaluationsabestworstscalingexperiment |