Cargando…

Prevalence of abnormal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging during the COVID-19 pandemic

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the rate of abnormal myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) studies at a single medical center during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to prior to the pandemic. METHODS: We retrospectively studied stress single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)-MPI s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasnie, Usman A., Bhambhvani, Pradeep, Iskandrian, Ami E., Hage, Fadi G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7791164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33416952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05123-z
_version_ 1783633551596453888
author Hasnie, Usman A.
Bhambhvani, Pradeep
Iskandrian, Ami E.
Hage, Fadi G.
author_facet Hasnie, Usman A.
Bhambhvani, Pradeep
Iskandrian, Ami E.
Hage, Fadi G.
author_sort Hasnie, Usman A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the rate of abnormal myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) studies at a single medical center during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to prior to the pandemic. METHODS: We retrospectively studied stress single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)-MPI studies performed during the peak of COVID-19 restrictions at the University of Alabama Medical Center in comparison to the same time period in 2019. RESULTS: SPECT-MPI volume was reduced from 553 per month in 2019 to 105 per month in 2020. The proportion of abnormal SPECT-MPI for the 2020 cohort (61 ± 13 years, 48% men, 41% black) was not different from the 2019 cohort (62 ± 12 years, 48% men, 42% black) (31% vs. 27%, p = 0.4). Similar proportion of patients in the 2 cohorts had abnormal myocardial perfusion, moderate-large perfusion defects, myocardial ischemia, myocardial scar, and abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction. The proportion of abnormal SPECT-MPIs was not different based on whether patients were evaluated face-to-face or by telemedicine (28% vs. 27%, p > 0.9) but was higher for cardiology providers (40% vs. 20%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant reduction in the number of SPECT-MPI studies performed during the peak restrictions from the pandemic. Despite this restriction, the rate of abnormal studies remained stable. Our study suggests that it remains difficult to predict which patients will have abnormal SPECT-MPI even when providers and stress laboratories are forced to prioritize the performance of studies to high-yield patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7791164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77911642021-01-08 Prevalence of abnormal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging during the COVID-19 pandemic Hasnie, Usman A. Bhambhvani, Pradeep Iskandrian, Ami E. Hage, Fadi G. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the rate of abnormal myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) studies at a single medical center during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to prior to the pandemic. METHODS: We retrospectively studied stress single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)-MPI studies performed during the peak of COVID-19 restrictions at the University of Alabama Medical Center in comparison to the same time period in 2019. RESULTS: SPECT-MPI volume was reduced from 553 per month in 2019 to 105 per month in 2020. The proportion of abnormal SPECT-MPI for the 2020 cohort (61 ± 13 years, 48% men, 41% black) was not different from the 2019 cohort (62 ± 12 years, 48% men, 42% black) (31% vs. 27%, p = 0.4). Similar proportion of patients in the 2 cohorts had abnormal myocardial perfusion, moderate-large perfusion defects, myocardial ischemia, myocardial scar, and abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction. The proportion of abnormal SPECT-MPIs was not different based on whether patients were evaluated face-to-face or by telemedicine (28% vs. 27%, p > 0.9) but was higher for cardiology providers (40% vs. 20%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant reduction in the number of SPECT-MPI studies performed during the peak restrictions from the pandemic. Despite this restriction, the rate of abnormal studies remained stable. Our study suggests that it remains difficult to predict which patients will have abnormal SPECT-MPI even when providers and stress laboratories are forced to prioritize the performance of studies to high-yield patients. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7791164/ /pubmed/33416952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05123-z Text en © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hasnie, Usman A.
Bhambhvani, Pradeep
Iskandrian, Ami E.
Hage, Fadi G.
Prevalence of abnormal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging during the COVID-19 pandemic
title Prevalence of abnormal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full Prevalence of abnormal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Prevalence of abnormal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of abnormal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_short Prevalence of abnormal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort prevalence of abnormal spect myocardial perfusion imaging during the covid-19 pandemic
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7791164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33416952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05123-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hasnieusmana prevalenceofabnormalspectmyocardialperfusionimagingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT bhambhvanipradeep prevalenceofabnormalspectmyocardialperfusionimagingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT iskandrianamie prevalenceofabnormalspectmyocardialperfusionimagingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT hagefadig prevalenceofabnormalspectmyocardialperfusionimagingduringthecovid19pandemic