Cargando…
A predictive model for respiratory distress in patients with COVID-19: a retrospective study
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has become a global public health crisis. We retrospectively evaluated 863 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection, designated IWCH-COVID-19. METHODS: We built a succe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7791231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33437784 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4977 |
_version_ | 1783633567084969984 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Xin Wang, Wei Wan, Cheng Cheng, Gong Yin, Yuechuchu Cao, Kaidi Zhang, Xiaoliang Wang, Zhongmin Miao, Shumei Yu, Yun Hu, Jie Huang, Ruochen Ge, Yun Chen, Ying Liu, Yun |
author_facet | Zhang, Xin Wang, Wei Wan, Cheng Cheng, Gong Yin, Yuechuchu Cao, Kaidi Zhang, Xiaoliang Wang, Zhongmin Miao, Shumei Yu, Yun Hu, Jie Huang, Ruochen Ge, Yun Chen, Ying Liu, Yun |
author_sort | Zhang, Xin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has become a global public health crisis. We retrospectively evaluated 863 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection, designated IWCH-COVID-19. METHODS: We built a successful predictive model after investigating the risk factors to predict respiratory distress within 30 days of admission. These variables were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards (PHs) analyses. Hazard ratios (HRs) and performance of the final model were determined. RESULTS: Neutrophil count >6.3×10(9)/L, D-dimer level ≥1.00 mg/L, and temperature ≥37.3 °C at admission showed significant positive association with the outcome of respiratory distress in the final model. Complement C3 (C3) of 0.9–1.8 g/L, platelet count >350×10(9)/L, and platelet count of 125–350×10(9)/L showed a significant negative association with outcomes of respiratory distress in the final model. The final model had a C statistic of 0.891 (0.867–0.915), an Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) of 567.65, and a bootstrap confidence interval (CI) of 0.866 (0.842–0.89). This five-factor model could help in early allocation of medical resources. CONCLUSIONS: The predictive model based on the five factors obtained at admission can be applied for calculating the risk of respiratory distress and classifying patients at an early stage. Accordingly, high-risk patients can receive timely and effective treatment, and health resources can be allocated effectively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7791231 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77912312021-01-11 A predictive model for respiratory distress in patients with COVID-19: a retrospective study Zhang, Xin Wang, Wei Wan, Cheng Cheng, Gong Yin, Yuechuchu Cao, Kaidi Zhang, Xiaoliang Wang, Zhongmin Miao, Shumei Yu, Yun Hu, Jie Huang, Ruochen Ge, Yun Chen, Ying Liu, Yun Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has become a global public health crisis. We retrospectively evaluated 863 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection, designated IWCH-COVID-19. METHODS: We built a successful predictive model after investigating the risk factors to predict respiratory distress within 30 days of admission. These variables were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards (PHs) analyses. Hazard ratios (HRs) and performance of the final model were determined. RESULTS: Neutrophil count >6.3×10(9)/L, D-dimer level ≥1.00 mg/L, and temperature ≥37.3 °C at admission showed significant positive association with the outcome of respiratory distress in the final model. Complement C3 (C3) of 0.9–1.8 g/L, platelet count >350×10(9)/L, and platelet count of 125–350×10(9)/L showed a significant negative association with outcomes of respiratory distress in the final model. The final model had a C statistic of 0.891 (0.867–0.915), an Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) of 567.65, and a bootstrap confidence interval (CI) of 0.866 (0.842–0.89). This five-factor model could help in early allocation of medical resources. CONCLUSIONS: The predictive model based on the five factors obtained at admission can be applied for calculating the risk of respiratory distress and classifying patients at an early stage. Accordingly, high-risk patients can receive timely and effective treatment, and health resources can be allocated effectively. AME Publishing Company 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7791231/ /pubmed/33437784 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4977 Text en 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zhang, Xin Wang, Wei Wan, Cheng Cheng, Gong Yin, Yuechuchu Cao, Kaidi Zhang, Xiaoliang Wang, Zhongmin Miao, Shumei Yu, Yun Hu, Jie Huang, Ruochen Ge, Yun Chen, Ying Liu, Yun A predictive model for respiratory distress in patients with COVID-19: a retrospective study |
title | A predictive model for respiratory distress in patients with COVID-19: a retrospective study |
title_full | A predictive model for respiratory distress in patients with COVID-19: a retrospective study |
title_fullStr | A predictive model for respiratory distress in patients with COVID-19: a retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | A predictive model for respiratory distress in patients with COVID-19: a retrospective study |
title_short | A predictive model for respiratory distress in patients with COVID-19: a retrospective study |
title_sort | predictive model for respiratory distress in patients with covid-19: a retrospective study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7791231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33437784 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4977 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangxin apredictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT wangwei apredictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT wancheng apredictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT chenggong apredictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT yinyuechuchu apredictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT caokaidi apredictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT zhangxiaoliang apredictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT wangzhongmin apredictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT miaoshumei apredictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT yuyun apredictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT hujie apredictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT huangruochen apredictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT geyun apredictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT chenying apredictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT liuyun apredictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT zhangxin predictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT wangwei predictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT wancheng predictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT chenggong predictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT yinyuechuchu predictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT caokaidi predictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT zhangxiaoliang predictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT wangzhongmin predictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT miaoshumei predictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT yuyun predictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT hujie predictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT huangruochen predictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT geyun predictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT chenying predictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy AT liuyun predictivemodelforrespiratorydistressinpatientswithcovid19aretrospectivestudy |