Cargando…

Single-Institute Clinical Experiences Using Whole-Field Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Sequential IMRT in Postoperative Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer (OCC)

This study aimed to review clinical experiences using whole-field simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and sequential IMRT in postoperative patients with oral cavity cancer (OCC). From November 2006 to December 2014, a total of 182 postoperative patients with O...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsieh, Chen-Hsi, Shueng, Pei-Wei, Wang, Li-Ying, Liao, Li-Jen, Lo, Wu-Chia, Yeh, Hsin-Pei, Chou, Hsiu-Ling, Wu, Le-Jung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7791442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33047615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274820904702
_version_ 1783633605313953792
author Hsieh, Chen-Hsi
Shueng, Pei-Wei
Wang, Li-Ying
Liao, Li-Jen
Lo, Wu-Chia
Yeh, Hsin-Pei
Chou, Hsiu-Ling
Wu, Le-Jung
author_facet Hsieh, Chen-Hsi
Shueng, Pei-Wei
Wang, Li-Ying
Liao, Li-Jen
Lo, Wu-Chia
Yeh, Hsin-Pei
Chou, Hsiu-Ling
Wu, Le-Jung
author_sort Hsieh, Chen-Hsi
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to review clinical experiences using whole-field simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and sequential IMRT in postoperative patients with oral cavity cancer (OCC). From November 2006 to December 2014, a total of 182 postoperative patients with OCC who underwent either SIB-IMRT (n = 63) or sequential IMRT (n = 119) were enrolled retrospectively and matched randomly according to multiple risk factors by a computer. The differences were well balanced after patient matching (P = .38). The median follow-up time was 65 months. For patients treated with the SIB technique and the sequential technique, the respective mortality rates were 36.8% and 20.0% (P = .04). The primary recurrence rates were 26.3% and 10.0% (P = .02), respectively. The respective marginal failure rates were 26.7% and 16.7%. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients who received the SIB technique had a 2.74 times higher risk of death than those who received the sequential technique (95% confidence interval = 1.10-6.79, P = .03). Sequential IMRT provided a significantly lower dose to the esophagus (5.2 Gy, P = .02) and trachea (4.6 Gy, P = .03) than SIB-IMRT. For patients with locally advanced OCC, postoperative sequential IMRT may overcome an unpredictable geographic miss, potentially with a lower marginal failure rate in the primary area. Patients treated by sequential IMRT show equal overall survival benefits to those treated by SIB-IMRT and a lower mortality rate than those treated by SIB-IMRT. Additionally, a reduced dose to the esophagus and trachea compared to sequential IMRT was noted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7791442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77914422021-04-09 Single-Institute Clinical Experiences Using Whole-Field Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Sequential IMRT in Postoperative Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer (OCC) Hsieh, Chen-Hsi Shueng, Pei-Wei Wang, Li-Ying Liao, Li-Jen Lo, Wu-Chia Yeh, Hsin-Pei Chou, Hsiu-Ling Wu, Le-Jung Cancer Control Special Collection on Recent Advances in Cancer Prevention and Treatment This study aimed to review clinical experiences using whole-field simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and sequential IMRT in postoperative patients with oral cavity cancer (OCC). From November 2006 to December 2014, a total of 182 postoperative patients with OCC who underwent either SIB-IMRT (n = 63) or sequential IMRT (n = 119) were enrolled retrospectively and matched randomly according to multiple risk factors by a computer. The differences were well balanced after patient matching (P = .38). The median follow-up time was 65 months. For patients treated with the SIB technique and the sequential technique, the respective mortality rates were 36.8% and 20.0% (P = .04). The primary recurrence rates were 26.3% and 10.0% (P = .02), respectively. The respective marginal failure rates were 26.7% and 16.7%. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients who received the SIB technique had a 2.74 times higher risk of death than those who received the sequential technique (95% confidence interval = 1.10-6.79, P = .03). Sequential IMRT provided a significantly lower dose to the esophagus (5.2 Gy, P = .02) and trachea (4.6 Gy, P = .03) than SIB-IMRT. For patients with locally advanced OCC, postoperative sequential IMRT may overcome an unpredictable geographic miss, potentially with a lower marginal failure rate in the primary area. Patients treated by sequential IMRT show equal overall survival benefits to those treated by SIB-IMRT and a lower mortality rate than those treated by SIB-IMRT. Additionally, a reduced dose to the esophagus and trachea compared to sequential IMRT was noted. SAGE Publications 2020-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7791442/ /pubmed/33047615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274820904702 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Special Collection on Recent Advances in Cancer Prevention and Treatment
Hsieh, Chen-Hsi
Shueng, Pei-Wei
Wang, Li-Ying
Liao, Li-Jen
Lo, Wu-Chia
Yeh, Hsin-Pei
Chou, Hsiu-Ling
Wu, Le-Jung
Single-Institute Clinical Experiences Using Whole-Field Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Sequential IMRT in Postoperative Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer (OCC)
title Single-Institute Clinical Experiences Using Whole-Field Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Sequential IMRT in Postoperative Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer (OCC)
title_full Single-Institute Clinical Experiences Using Whole-Field Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Sequential IMRT in Postoperative Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer (OCC)
title_fullStr Single-Institute Clinical Experiences Using Whole-Field Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Sequential IMRT in Postoperative Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer (OCC)
title_full_unstemmed Single-Institute Clinical Experiences Using Whole-Field Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Sequential IMRT in Postoperative Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer (OCC)
title_short Single-Institute Clinical Experiences Using Whole-Field Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Sequential IMRT in Postoperative Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer (OCC)
title_sort single-institute clinical experiences using whole-field simultaneous integrated boost (sib) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (imrt) and sequential imrt in postoperative patients with oral cavity cancer (occ)
topic Special Collection on Recent Advances in Cancer Prevention and Treatment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7791442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33047615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274820904702
work_keys_str_mv AT hsiehchenhsi singleinstituteclinicalexperiencesusingwholefieldsimultaneousintegratedboostsibintensitymodulatedradiotherapyimrtandsequentialimrtinpostoperativepatientswithoralcavitycancerocc
AT shuengpeiwei singleinstituteclinicalexperiencesusingwholefieldsimultaneousintegratedboostsibintensitymodulatedradiotherapyimrtandsequentialimrtinpostoperativepatientswithoralcavitycancerocc
AT wangliying singleinstituteclinicalexperiencesusingwholefieldsimultaneousintegratedboostsibintensitymodulatedradiotherapyimrtandsequentialimrtinpostoperativepatientswithoralcavitycancerocc
AT liaolijen singleinstituteclinicalexperiencesusingwholefieldsimultaneousintegratedboostsibintensitymodulatedradiotherapyimrtandsequentialimrtinpostoperativepatientswithoralcavitycancerocc
AT lowuchia singleinstituteclinicalexperiencesusingwholefieldsimultaneousintegratedboostsibintensitymodulatedradiotherapyimrtandsequentialimrtinpostoperativepatientswithoralcavitycancerocc
AT yehhsinpei singleinstituteclinicalexperiencesusingwholefieldsimultaneousintegratedboostsibintensitymodulatedradiotherapyimrtandsequentialimrtinpostoperativepatientswithoralcavitycancerocc
AT chouhsiuling singleinstituteclinicalexperiencesusingwholefieldsimultaneousintegratedboostsibintensitymodulatedradiotherapyimrtandsequentialimrtinpostoperativepatientswithoralcavitycancerocc
AT wulejung singleinstituteclinicalexperiencesusingwholefieldsimultaneousintegratedboostsibintensitymodulatedradiotherapyimrtandsequentialimrtinpostoperativepatientswithoralcavitycancerocc