Cargando…
Single-Institute Clinical Experiences Using Whole-Field Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Sequential IMRT in Postoperative Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer (OCC)
This study aimed to review clinical experiences using whole-field simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and sequential IMRT in postoperative patients with oral cavity cancer (OCC). From November 2006 to December 2014, a total of 182 postoperative patients with O...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7791442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33047615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274820904702 |
_version_ | 1783633605313953792 |
---|---|
author | Hsieh, Chen-Hsi Shueng, Pei-Wei Wang, Li-Ying Liao, Li-Jen Lo, Wu-Chia Yeh, Hsin-Pei Chou, Hsiu-Ling Wu, Le-Jung |
author_facet | Hsieh, Chen-Hsi Shueng, Pei-Wei Wang, Li-Ying Liao, Li-Jen Lo, Wu-Chia Yeh, Hsin-Pei Chou, Hsiu-Ling Wu, Le-Jung |
author_sort | Hsieh, Chen-Hsi |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to review clinical experiences using whole-field simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and sequential IMRT in postoperative patients with oral cavity cancer (OCC). From November 2006 to December 2014, a total of 182 postoperative patients with OCC who underwent either SIB-IMRT (n = 63) or sequential IMRT (n = 119) were enrolled retrospectively and matched randomly according to multiple risk factors by a computer. The differences were well balanced after patient matching (P = .38). The median follow-up time was 65 months. For patients treated with the SIB technique and the sequential technique, the respective mortality rates were 36.8% and 20.0% (P = .04). The primary recurrence rates were 26.3% and 10.0% (P = .02), respectively. The respective marginal failure rates were 26.7% and 16.7%. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients who received the SIB technique had a 2.74 times higher risk of death than those who received the sequential technique (95% confidence interval = 1.10-6.79, P = .03). Sequential IMRT provided a significantly lower dose to the esophagus (5.2 Gy, P = .02) and trachea (4.6 Gy, P = .03) than SIB-IMRT. For patients with locally advanced OCC, postoperative sequential IMRT may overcome an unpredictable geographic miss, potentially with a lower marginal failure rate in the primary area. Patients treated by sequential IMRT show equal overall survival benefits to those treated by SIB-IMRT and a lower mortality rate than those treated by SIB-IMRT. Additionally, a reduced dose to the esophagus and trachea compared to sequential IMRT was noted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7791442 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77914422021-04-09 Single-Institute Clinical Experiences Using Whole-Field Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Sequential IMRT in Postoperative Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer (OCC) Hsieh, Chen-Hsi Shueng, Pei-Wei Wang, Li-Ying Liao, Li-Jen Lo, Wu-Chia Yeh, Hsin-Pei Chou, Hsiu-Ling Wu, Le-Jung Cancer Control Special Collection on Recent Advances in Cancer Prevention and Treatment This study aimed to review clinical experiences using whole-field simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and sequential IMRT in postoperative patients with oral cavity cancer (OCC). From November 2006 to December 2014, a total of 182 postoperative patients with OCC who underwent either SIB-IMRT (n = 63) or sequential IMRT (n = 119) were enrolled retrospectively and matched randomly according to multiple risk factors by a computer. The differences were well balanced after patient matching (P = .38). The median follow-up time was 65 months. For patients treated with the SIB technique and the sequential technique, the respective mortality rates were 36.8% and 20.0% (P = .04). The primary recurrence rates were 26.3% and 10.0% (P = .02), respectively. The respective marginal failure rates were 26.7% and 16.7%. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients who received the SIB technique had a 2.74 times higher risk of death than those who received the sequential technique (95% confidence interval = 1.10-6.79, P = .03). Sequential IMRT provided a significantly lower dose to the esophagus (5.2 Gy, P = .02) and trachea (4.6 Gy, P = .03) than SIB-IMRT. For patients with locally advanced OCC, postoperative sequential IMRT may overcome an unpredictable geographic miss, potentially with a lower marginal failure rate in the primary area. Patients treated by sequential IMRT show equal overall survival benefits to those treated by SIB-IMRT and a lower mortality rate than those treated by SIB-IMRT. Additionally, a reduced dose to the esophagus and trachea compared to sequential IMRT was noted. SAGE Publications 2020-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7791442/ /pubmed/33047615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274820904702 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Special Collection on Recent Advances in Cancer Prevention and Treatment Hsieh, Chen-Hsi Shueng, Pei-Wei Wang, Li-Ying Liao, Li-Jen Lo, Wu-Chia Yeh, Hsin-Pei Chou, Hsiu-Ling Wu, Le-Jung Single-Institute Clinical Experiences Using Whole-Field Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Sequential IMRT in Postoperative Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer (OCC) |
title | Single-Institute Clinical Experiences Using Whole-Field Simultaneous
Integrated Boost (SIB) Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Sequential
IMRT in Postoperative Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer (OCC) |
title_full | Single-Institute Clinical Experiences Using Whole-Field Simultaneous
Integrated Boost (SIB) Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Sequential
IMRT in Postoperative Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer (OCC) |
title_fullStr | Single-Institute Clinical Experiences Using Whole-Field Simultaneous
Integrated Boost (SIB) Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Sequential
IMRT in Postoperative Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer (OCC) |
title_full_unstemmed | Single-Institute Clinical Experiences Using Whole-Field Simultaneous
Integrated Boost (SIB) Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Sequential
IMRT in Postoperative Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer (OCC) |
title_short | Single-Institute Clinical Experiences Using Whole-Field Simultaneous
Integrated Boost (SIB) Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Sequential
IMRT in Postoperative Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer (OCC) |
title_sort | single-institute clinical experiences using whole-field simultaneous
integrated boost (sib) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (imrt) and sequential
imrt in postoperative patients with oral cavity cancer (occ) |
topic | Special Collection on Recent Advances in Cancer Prevention and Treatment |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7791442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33047615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274820904702 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hsiehchenhsi singleinstituteclinicalexperiencesusingwholefieldsimultaneousintegratedboostsibintensitymodulatedradiotherapyimrtandsequentialimrtinpostoperativepatientswithoralcavitycancerocc AT shuengpeiwei singleinstituteclinicalexperiencesusingwholefieldsimultaneousintegratedboostsibintensitymodulatedradiotherapyimrtandsequentialimrtinpostoperativepatientswithoralcavitycancerocc AT wangliying singleinstituteclinicalexperiencesusingwholefieldsimultaneousintegratedboostsibintensitymodulatedradiotherapyimrtandsequentialimrtinpostoperativepatientswithoralcavitycancerocc AT liaolijen singleinstituteclinicalexperiencesusingwholefieldsimultaneousintegratedboostsibintensitymodulatedradiotherapyimrtandsequentialimrtinpostoperativepatientswithoralcavitycancerocc AT lowuchia singleinstituteclinicalexperiencesusingwholefieldsimultaneousintegratedboostsibintensitymodulatedradiotherapyimrtandsequentialimrtinpostoperativepatientswithoralcavitycancerocc AT yehhsinpei singleinstituteclinicalexperiencesusingwholefieldsimultaneousintegratedboostsibintensitymodulatedradiotherapyimrtandsequentialimrtinpostoperativepatientswithoralcavitycancerocc AT chouhsiuling singleinstituteclinicalexperiencesusingwholefieldsimultaneousintegratedboostsibintensitymodulatedradiotherapyimrtandsequentialimrtinpostoperativepatientswithoralcavitycancerocc AT wulejung singleinstituteclinicalexperiencesusingwholefieldsimultaneousintegratedboostsibintensitymodulatedradiotherapyimrtandsequentialimrtinpostoperativepatientswithoralcavitycancerocc |