Cargando…
Predicting Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Cancer Patients Based on Machine Learning
OBJECTIVE: The aim is to explore the prediction effect of 5 machine learning algorithms on peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer. METHODS: 1080 patients with postoperative gastric cancer were divided into a training group and test group according to the ratio of 7:3. The model of peritoneal metast...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7791448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33115287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274820968900 |
_version_ | 1783633606746308608 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Chengmao Wang, Ying Ji, Mu-Huo Tong, Jianhua Yang, Jian-Jun Xia, Hongping |
author_facet | Zhou, Chengmao Wang, Ying Ji, Mu-Huo Tong, Jianhua Yang, Jian-Jun Xia, Hongping |
author_sort | Zhou, Chengmao |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim is to explore the prediction effect of 5 machine learning algorithms on peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer. METHODS: 1080 patients with postoperative gastric cancer were divided into a training group and test group according to the ratio of 7:3. The model of peritoneal metastasis was established by using 5 machine learning (gbm(Light Gradient Boosting Machine), GradientBoosting, forest, Logistic and DecisionTree). Python pair was used to analyze the machine learning algorithm. Gbm algorithm is used to show the weight proportion of each variable to the result. RESULT: Correlation analysis showed that tumor size and depth of invasion were positively correlated with the recurrence of patients after gastric cancer surgery. The results of the gbm algorithm showed that the top 5 important factors were albumin, platelet count, depth of infiltration, preoperative hemoglobin and weight, respectively. In training group: Among the 5 algorithm models, the accuracy of GradientBoosting and gbm was the highest (0.909); the AUC values of the 5 algorithms are gbm (0.938), GradientBoosting (0.861), forest (0.796), Logistic(0.741) and DecisionTree(0.712) from high to low. In the test group: among the 5 algorithm models, the accuracy of forest, DecisionTree and gbm was the highest (0.907); AUC values ranged from high to low to gbm (0.745), GradientBoosting (0.725), forest (0.696), Logistic (0.680) and DecisionTree (0.657). CONCLUSION: Machine learning can predict the peritoneal metastasis in patients with gastric cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7791448 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77914482021-04-09 Predicting Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Cancer Patients Based on Machine Learning Zhou, Chengmao Wang, Ying Ji, Mu-Huo Tong, Jianhua Yang, Jian-Jun Xia, Hongping Cancer Control Original Research Paper OBJECTIVE: The aim is to explore the prediction effect of 5 machine learning algorithms on peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer. METHODS: 1080 patients with postoperative gastric cancer were divided into a training group and test group according to the ratio of 7:3. The model of peritoneal metastasis was established by using 5 machine learning (gbm(Light Gradient Boosting Machine), GradientBoosting, forest, Logistic and DecisionTree). Python pair was used to analyze the machine learning algorithm. Gbm algorithm is used to show the weight proportion of each variable to the result. RESULT: Correlation analysis showed that tumor size and depth of invasion were positively correlated with the recurrence of patients after gastric cancer surgery. The results of the gbm algorithm showed that the top 5 important factors were albumin, platelet count, depth of infiltration, preoperative hemoglobin and weight, respectively. In training group: Among the 5 algorithm models, the accuracy of GradientBoosting and gbm was the highest (0.909); the AUC values of the 5 algorithms are gbm (0.938), GradientBoosting (0.861), forest (0.796), Logistic(0.741) and DecisionTree(0.712) from high to low. In the test group: among the 5 algorithm models, the accuracy of forest, DecisionTree and gbm was the highest (0.907); AUC values ranged from high to low to gbm (0.745), GradientBoosting (0.725), forest (0.696), Logistic (0.680) and DecisionTree (0.657). CONCLUSION: Machine learning can predict the peritoneal metastasis in patients with gastric cancer. SAGE Publications 2020-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7791448/ /pubmed/33115287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274820968900 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Paper Zhou, Chengmao Wang, Ying Ji, Mu-Huo Tong, Jianhua Yang, Jian-Jun Xia, Hongping Predicting Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Cancer Patients Based on Machine Learning |
title | Predicting Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Cancer Patients Based on
Machine Learning |
title_full | Predicting Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Cancer Patients Based on
Machine Learning |
title_fullStr | Predicting Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Cancer Patients Based on
Machine Learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Cancer Patients Based on
Machine Learning |
title_short | Predicting Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Cancer Patients Based on
Machine Learning |
title_sort | predicting peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer patients based on
machine learning |
topic | Original Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7791448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33115287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274820968900 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhouchengmao predictingperitonealmetastasisofgastriccancerpatientsbasedonmachinelearning AT wangying predictingperitonealmetastasisofgastriccancerpatientsbasedonmachinelearning AT jimuhuo predictingperitonealmetastasisofgastriccancerpatientsbasedonmachinelearning AT tongjianhua predictingperitonealmetastasisofgastriccancerpatientsbasedonmachinelearning AT yangjianjun predictingperitonealmetastasisofgastriccancerpatientsbasedonmachinelearning AT xiahongping predictingperitonealmetastasisofgastriccancerpatientsbasedonmachinelearning |