Cargando…

Predicting Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Cancer Patients Based on Machine Learning

OBJECTIVE: The aim is to explore the prediction effect of 5 machine learning algorithms on peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer. METHODS: 1080 patients with postoperative gastric cancer were divided into a training group and test group according to the ratio of 7:3. The model of peritoneal metast...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Chengmao, Wang, Ying, Ji, Mu-Huo, Tong, Jianhua, Yang, Jian-Jun, Xia, Hongping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7791448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33115287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274820968900
_version_ 1783633606746308608
author Zhou, Chengmao
Wang, Ying
Ji, Mu-Huo
Tong, Jianhua
Yang, Jian-Jun
Xia, Hongping
author_facet Zhou, Chengmao
Wang, Ying
Ji, Mu-Huo
Tong, Jianhua
Yang, Jian-Jun
Xia, Hongping
author_sort Zhou, Chengmao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim is to explore the prediction effect of 5 machine learning algorithms on peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer. METHODS: 1080 patients with postoperative gastric cancer were divided into a training group and test group according to the ratio of 7:3. The model of peritoneal metastasis was established by using 5 machine learning (gbm(Light Gradient Boosting Machine), GradientBoosting, forest, Logistic and DecisionTree). Python pair was used to analyze the machine learning algorithm. Gbm algorithm is used to show the weight proportion of each variable to the result. RESULT: Correlation analysis showed that tumor size and depth of invasion were positively correlated with the recurrence of patients after gastric cancer surgery. The results of the gbm algorithm showed that the top 5 important factors were albumin, platelet count, depth of infiltration, preoperative hemoglobin and weight, respectively. In training group: Among the 5 algorithm models, the accuracy of GradientBoosting and gbm was the highest (0.909); the AUC values of the 5 algorithms are gbm (0.938), GradientBoosting (0.861), forest (0.796), Logistic(0.741) and DecisionTree(0.712) from high to low. In the test group: among the 5 algorithm models, the accuracy of forest, DecisionTree and gbm was the highest (0.907); AUC values ranged from high to low to gbm (0.745), GradientBoosting (0.725), forest (0.696), Logistic (0.680) and DecisionTree (0.657). CONCLUSION: Machine learning can predict the peritoneal metastasis in patients with gastric cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7791448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77914482021-04-09 Predicting Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Cancer Patients Based on Machine Learning Zhou, Chengmao Wang, Ying Ji, Mu-Huo Tong, Jianhua Yang, Jian-Jun Xia, Hongping Cancer Control Original Research Paper OBJECTIVE: The aim is to explore the prediction effect of 5 machine learning algorithms on peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer. METHODS: 1080 patients with postoperative gastric cancer were divided into a training group and test group according to the ratio of 7:3. The model of peritoneal metastasis was established by using 5 machine learning (gbm(Light Gradient Boosting Machine), GradientBoosting, forest, Logistic and DecisionTree). Python pair was used to analyze the machine learning algorithm. Gbm algorithm is used to show the weight proportion of each variable to the result. RESULT: Correlation analysis showed that tumor size and depth of invasion were positively correlated with the recurrence of patients after gastric cancer surgery. The results of the gbm algorithm showed that the top 5 important factors were albumin, platelet count, depth of infiltration, preoperative hemoglobin and weight, respectively. In training group: Among the 5 algorithm models, the accuracy of GradientBoosting and gbm was the highest (0.909); the AUC values of the 5 algorithms are gbm (0.938), GradientBoosting (0.861), forest (0.796), Logistic(0.741) and DecisionTree(0.712) from high to low. In the test group: among the 5 algorithm models, the accuracy of forest, DecisionTree and gbm was the highest (0.907); AUC values ranged from high to low to gbm (0.745), GradientBoosting (0.725), forest (0.696), Logistic (0.680) and DecisionTree (0.657). CONCLUSION: Machine learning can predict the peritoneal metastasis in patients with gastric cancer. SAGE Publications 2020-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7791448/ /pubmed/33115287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274820968900 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Paper
Zhou, Chengmao
Wang, Ying
Ji, Mu-Huo
Tong, Jianhua
Yang, Jian-Jun
Xia, Hongping
Predicting Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Cancer Patients Based on Machine Learning
title Predicting Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Cancer Patients Based on Machine Learning
title_full Predicting Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Cancer Patients Based on Machine Learning
title_fullStr Predicting Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Cancer Patients Based on Machine Learning
title_full_unstemmed Predicting Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Cancer Patients Based on Machine Learning
title_short Predicting Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Cancer Patients Based on Machine Learning
title_sort predicting peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer patients based on machine learning
topic Original Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7791448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33115287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274820968900
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouchengmao predictingperitonealmetastasisofgastriccancerpatientsbasedonmachinelearning
AT wangying predictingperitonealmetastasisofgastriccancerpatientsbasedonmachinelearning
AT jimuhuo predictingperitonealmetastasisofgastriccancerpatientsbasedonmachinelearning
AT tongjianhua predictingperitonealmetastasisofgastriccancerpatientsbasedonmachinelearning
AT yangjianjun predictingperitonealmetastasisofgastriccancerpatientsbasedonmachinelearning
AT xiahongping predictingperitonealmetastasisofgastriccancerpatientsbasedonmachinelearning