Cargando…

Immunogenicity of biologic therapies for migraine: a review of current evidence

BACKGROUND: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway have been shown to be effective in migraine prevention. Eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumb have shown efficacy in clinical trials along with favorable safety and tolerability profi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cohen, Joshua M., Ning, Xiaoping, Kessler, Yoel, Rasamoelisolo, Michele, Campos, Verena Ramirez, Seminerio, Michael J., Krasenbaum, Lynda J., Shen, Honglue, Stratton, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7791637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01211-5
_version_ 1783633634411937792
author Cohen, Joshua M.
Ning, Xiaoping
Kessler, Yoel
Rasamoelisolo, Michele
Campos, Verena Ramirez
Seminerio, Michael J.
Krasenbaum, Lynda J.
Shen, Honglue
Stratton, Jennifer
author_facet Cohen, Joshua M.
Ning, Xiaoping
Kessler, Yoel
Rasamoelisolo, Michele
Campos, Verena Ramirez
Seminerio, Michael J.
Krasenbaum, Lynda J.
Shen, Honglue
Stratton, Jennifer
author_sort Cohen, Joshua M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway have been shown to be effective in migraine prevention. Eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumb have shown efficacy in clinical trials along with favorable safety and tolerability profiles. Although erenumab is a human mAb and the others have been humanized to varying degrees, they all have the capacity to provoke immune reactions. The present review article aims to discuss the current relationship between mAbs targeting the CGRP pathway (CGRP mAbs) and immunogenicity and their potential clinical implications. FINDINGS: The incidence of patients developing anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), their titer, and clinical significance are highly variable and depend on a variety of different drug and patient factors. Neutralizing ADAs (NAbs) bind to and inhibit or reduce the pharmacologic activity of the biologic drug molecule, whereas non-neutralizing antibodies (Non-NAbs) bind to the biologic drug molecule without affecting pharmacologic activity in an in vitro test, although pharmacokinetics and drug clearance may be affected. A direct comparison of immunogenicity data across clinical trials with different biologics is not possible due to a lack of standardized assays. Several phase 2, phase 3, and long-term studies evaluating CGRP mAbs for migraine prevention have reported immunogenicity data (5 studies each for eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab). Across these studies, prevalence of ADAs varied, ranging from < 1% to ~ 18%. Neutralizing ADAs were slightly less common, with a prevalence ranging from 0 to 12%. Adverse events related to ADA formation were rare. CONCLUSIONS: As more CGRP mAb studies are conducted and more long-term follow-up data become available, evidence is increasing that immunogenicity rates of biologic therapies for migraine are low, and adverse events related to ADAs are rare. Taken together, these results add to the growing body of evidence for the safety and tolerability of this class of migraine medications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7791637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77916372021-01-11 Immunogenicity of biologic therapies for migraine: a review of current evidence Cohen, Joshua M. Ning, Xiaoping Kessler, Yoel Rasamoelisolo, Michele Campos, Verena Ramirez Seminerio, Michael J. Krasenbaum, Lynda J. Shen, Honglue Stratton, Jennifer J Headache Pain Review Article BACKGROUND: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway have been shown to be effective in migraine prevention. Eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumb have shown efficacy in clinical trials along with favorable safety and tolerability profiles. Although erenumab is a human mAb and the others have been humanized to varying degrees, they all have the capacity to provoke immune reactions. The present review article aims to discuss the current relationship between mAbs targeting the CGRP pathway (CGRP mAbs) and immunogenicity and their potential clinical implications. FINDINGS: The incidence of patients developing anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), their titer, and clinical significance are highly variable and depend on a variety of different drug and patient factors. Neutralizing ADAs (NAbs) bind to and inhibit or reduce the pharmacologic activity of the biologic drug molecule, whereas non-neutralizing antibodies (Non-NAbs) bind to the biologic drug molecule without affecting pharmacologic activity in an in vitro test, although pharmacokinetics and drug clearance may be affected. A direct comparison of immunogenicity data across clinical trials with different biologics is not possible due to a lack of standardized assays. Several phase 2, phase 3, and long-term studies evaluating CGRP mAbs for migraine prevention have reported immunogenicity data (5 studies each for eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab). Across these studies, prevalence of ADAs varied, ranging from < 1% to ~ 18%. Neutralizing ADAs were slightly less common, with a prevalence ranging from 0 to 12%. Adverse events related to ADA formation were rare. CONCLUSIONS: As more CGRP mAb studies are conducted and more long-term follow-up data become available, evidence is increasing that immunogenicity rates of biologic therapies for migraine are low, and adverse events related to ADAs are rare. Taken together, these results add to the growing body of evidence for the safety and tolerability of this class of migraine medications. Springer Milan 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7791637/ /pubmed/33413094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01211-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review Article
Cohen, Joshua M.
Ning, Xiaoping
Kessler, Yoel
Rasamoelisolo, Michele
Campos, Verena Ramirez
Seminerio, Michael J.
Krasenbaum, Lynda J.
Shen, Honglue
Stratton, Jennifer
Immunogenicity of biologic therapies for migraine: a review of current evidence
title Immunogenicity of biologic therapies for migraine: a review of current evidence
title_full Immunogenicity of biologic therapies for migraine: a review of current evidence
title_fullStr Immunogenicity of biologic therapies for migraine: a review of current evidence
title_full_unstemmed Immunogenicity of biologic therapies for migraine: a review of current evidence
title_short Immunogenicity of biologic therapies for migraine: a review of current evidence
title_sort immunogenicity of biologic therapies for migraine: a review of current evidence
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7791637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01211-5
work_keys_str_mv AT cohenjoshuam immunogenicityofbiologictherapiesformigraineareviewofcurrentevidence
AT ningxiaoping immunogenicityofbiologictherapiesformigraineareviewofcurrentevidence
AT kessleryoel immunogenicityofbiologictherapiesformigraineareviewofcurrentevidence
AT rasamoelisolomichele immunogenicityofbiologictherapiesformigraineareviewofcurrentevidence
AT camposverenaramirez immunogenicityofbiologictherapiesformigraineareviewofcurrentevidence
AT semineriomichaelj immunogenicityofbiologictherapiesformigraineareviewofcurrentevidence
AT krasenbaumlyndaj immunogenicityofbiologictherapiesformigraineareviewofcurrentevidence
AT shenhonglue immunogenicityofbiologictherapiesformigraineareviewofcurrentevidence
AT strattonjennifer immunogenicityofbiologictherapiesformigraineareviewofcurrentevidence