Cargando…
Craniofacial morphology/phenotypes influence on mandibular range of movement in the design of a mandibular advancement device
BACKGROUND: The mandibular opening path movements have different directions according to the craniofacial morphology of the patient but always downward and backward, therefore increasing the collapse of the upper airway. The aim of this work is to determine if there is a relationship between the cra...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7791719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01369-z |
_version_ | 1783633652045840384 |
---|---|
author | Sanz, P. Mayoral Reyes, M. Garcia Torras, A. Bataller Castillo, J. A. Cabrera Vich, M. O. Lagravère |
author_facet | Sanz, P. Mayoral Reyes, M. Garcia Torras, A. Bataller Castillo, J. A. Cabrera Vich, M. O. Lagravère |
author_sort | Sanz, P. Mayoral |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The mandibular opening path movements have different directions according to the craniofacial morphology of the patient but always downward and backward, therefore increasing the collapse of the upper airway. The aim of this work is to determine if there is a relationship between the craniofacial morphology and the mandibular movement to help understand the impact on the mandibular position. METHODS: 52 students with full permanent dentition aged 19 to 23 years (mean 21.3 SD 1.7; 29 females and 23 males), participated in the study. Each subject had a lateral cephalometric radiograph taken. The opening angle was determined for two levels of vertical openings at 5 and 10 mm. RESULTS: The opening angle showed a greater variability between subjects ranging from 63.15 to 77.08 for 5 mm angle and from for 61.65 to 75.72 for the 10 mm angle. Differences of facial phenotypes was evident when comparing the individual dissoccluding angle of the low angle horizontal pattern and high angle vertical pattern. CONCLUSIONS: The opening angle is related to craniofacial morphology with higher vertical anterior and shorter anteroposterior faces having a more horizontal path of mandibular movement than shorter vertical anterior and longer anteroposterior subjects who have a more vertical path. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7791719 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77917192021-01-11 Craniofacial morphology/phenotypes influence on mandibular range of movement in the design of a mandibular advancement device Sanz, P. Mayoral Reyes, M. Garcia Torras, A. Bataller Castillo, J. A. Cabrera Vich, M. O. Lagravère BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The mandibular opening path movements have different directions according to the craniofacial morphology of the patient but always downward and backward, therefore increasing the collapse of the upper airway. The aim of this work is to determine if there is a relationship between the craniofacial morphology and the mandibular movement to help understand the impact on the mandibular position. METHODS: 52 students with full permanent dentition aged 19 to 23 years (mean 21.3 SD 1.7; 29 females and 23 males), participated in the study. Each subject had a lateral cephalometric radiograph taken. The opening angle was determined for two levels of vertical openings at 5 and 10 mm. RESULTS: The opening angle showed a greater variability between subjects ranging from 63.15 to 77.08 for 5 mm angle and from for 61.65 to 75.72 for the 10 mm angle. Differences of facial phenotypes was evident when comparing the individual dissoccluding angle of the low angle horizontal pattern and high angle vertical pattern. CONCLUSIONS: The opening angle is related to craniofacial morphology with higher vertical anterior and shorter anteroposterior faces having a more horizontal path of mandibular movement than shorter vertical anterior and longer anteroposterior subjects who have a more vertical path. BioMed Central 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7791719/ /pubmed/33413283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01369-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sanz, P. Mayoral Reyes, M. Garcia Torras, A. Bataller Castillo, J. A. Cabrera Vich, M. O. Lagravère Craniofacial morphology/phenotypes influence on mandibular range of movement in the design of a mandibular advancement device |
title | Craniofacial morphology/phenotypes influence on mandibular range of movement in the design of a mandibular advancement device |
title_full | Craniofacial morphology/phenotypes influence on mandibular range of movement in the design of a mandibular advancement device |
title_fullStr | Craniofacial morphology/phenotypes influence on mandibular range of movement in the design of a mandibular advancement device |
title_full_unstemmed | Craniofacial morphology/phenotypes influence on mandibular range of movement in the design of a mandibular advancement device |
title_short | Craniofacial morphology/phenotypes influence on mandibular range of movement in the design of a mandibular advancement device |
title_sort | craniofacial morphology/phenotypes influence on mandibular range of movement in the design of a mandibular advancement device |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7791719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01369-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sanzpmayoral craniofacialmorphologyphenotypesinfluenceonmandibularrangeofmovementinthedesignofamandibularadvancementdevice AT reyesmgarcia craniofacialmorphologyphenotypesinfluenceonmandibularrangeofmovementinthedesignofamandibularadvancementdevice AT torrasabataller craniofacialmorphologyphenotypesinfluenceonmandibularrangeofmovementinthedesignofamandibularadvancementdevice AT castillojacabrera craniofacialmorphologyphenotypesinfluenceonmandibularrangeofmovementinthedesignofamandibularadvancementdevice AT vichmolagravere craniofacialmorphologyphenotypesinfluenceonmandibularrangeofmovementinthedesignofamandibularadvancementdevice |