Cargando…

Serological diagnosis and prevalence of HIV-1 infection in Russian metropolitan areas

BACKGROUND: HIV infection is a major health problem in Russia. We aimed to assess HIV prevalence in different population groups and to compare the characteristics of 4th generation immunoassays from Abbott, Bio-Rad, Vector-Best, Diagnostic Systems, and Medical Biological Unit. METHODS: The study inc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kireev, D. E., Chulanov, V. P., Shipulin, G. A., Semenov, A. V., Tivanova, E. V., Kolyasnikova, N. M., Zueva, E. B., Pokrovskiy, V. V., Galli, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7791727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05695-z
_version_ 1783633653721464832
author Kireev, D. E.
Chulanov, V. P.
Shipulin, G. A.
Semenov, A. V.
Tivanova, E. V.
Kolyasnikova, N. M.
Zueva, E. B.
Pokrovskiy, V. V.
Galli, C.
author_facet Kireev, D. E.
Chulanov, V. P.
Shipulin, G. A.
Semenov, A. V.
Tivanova, E. V.
Kolyasnikova, N. M.
Zueva, E. B.
Pokrovskiy, V. V.
Galli, C.
author_sort Kireev, D. E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: HIV infection is a major health problem in Russia. We aimed to assess HIV prevalence in different population groups and to compare the characteristics of 4th generation immunoassays from Abbott, Bio-Rad, Vector-Best, Diagnostic Systems, and Medical Biological Unit. METHODS: The study included 4452 individuals from the general population (GP), 391 subjects at high risk of HIV infection (HR) and 699 with potentially interfering conditions. HIV positivity was confirmed by immunoblot and by HIV RNA, seroconversion and virus diversity panels were also used. HIV avidity was employed to assess recent infections. RESULTS: The prevalence in GP was 0.40%, higher in males (0.62%) and in people aged < 40 years (0.58%). Patients attending dermo-venereal centers and drug users had a high prevalence (34.1 and 58.8%). Recent infections were diagnosed in 20% of GP and in 4.2% of HR. Assay sensitivity was 100% except for one false negative (99,54%, MBU). Specificity was 99.58–99.89% overall, but as low as 93.26% on HR (Vector-Best). Small differences on early seroconversion were recorded. Only the Abbott assay detected all samples on the viral diversity panel. CONCLUSION: HIV infection rate in the high-risk groups suggests that awareness and screening campaigns should be enhanced. Fourth generation assays are adequate but performance differences must be considered. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-020-05695-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7791727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77917272021-01-11 Serological diagnosis and prevalence of HIV-1 infection in Russian metropolitan areas Kireev, D. E. Chulanov, V. P. Shipulin, G. A. Semenov, A. V. Tivanova, E. V. Kolyasnikova, N. M. Zueva, E. B. Pokrovskiy, V. V. Galli, C. BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: HIV infection is a major health problem in Russia. We aimed to assess HIV prevalence in different population groups and to compare the characteristics of 4th generation immunoassays from Abbott, Bio-Rad, Vector-Best, Diagnostic Systems, and Medical Biological Unit. METHODS: The study included 4452 individuals from the general population (GP), 391 subjects at high risk of HIV infection (HR) and 699 with potentially interfering conditions. HIV positivity was confirmed by immunoblot and by HIV RNA, seroconversion and virus diversity panels were also used. HIV avidity was employed to assess recent infections. RESULTS: The prevalence in GP was 0.40%, higher in males (0.62%) and in people aged < 40 years (0.58%). Patients attending dermo-venereal centers and drug users had a high prevalence (34.1 and 58.8%). Recent infections were diagnosed in 20% of GP and in 4.2% of HR. Assay sensitivity was 100% except for one false negative (99,54%, MBU). Specificity was 99.58–99.89% overall, but as low as 93.26% on HR (Vector-Best). Small differences on early seroconversion were recorded. Only the Abbott assay detected all samples on the viral diversity panel. CONCLUSION: HIV infection rate in the high-risk groups suggests that awareness and screening campaigns should be enhanced. Fourth generation assays are adequate but performance differences must be considered. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-020-05695-z. BioMed Central 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7791727/ /pubmed/33413197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05695-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kireev, D. E.
Chulanov, V. P.
Shipulin, G. A.
Semenov, A. V.
Tivanova, E. V.
Kolyasnikova, N. M.
Zueva, E. B.
Pokrovskiy, V. V.
Galli, C.
Serological diagnosis and prevalence of HIV-1 infection in Russian metropolitan areas
title Serological diagnosis and prevalence of HIV-1 infection in Russian metropolitan areas
title_full Serological diagnosis and prevalence of HIV-1 infection in Russian metropolitan areas
title_fullStr Serological diagnosis and prevalence of HIV-1 infection in Russian metropolitan areas
title_full_unstemmed Serological diagnosis and prevalence of HIV-1 infection in Russian metropolitan areas
title_short Serological diagnosis and prevalence of HIV-1 infection in Russian metropolitan areas
title_sort serological diagnosis and prevalence of hiv-1 infection in russian metropolitan areas
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7791727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05695-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kireevde serologicaldiagnosisandprevalenceofhiv1infectioninrussianmetropolitanareas
AT chulanovvp serologicaldiagnosisandprevalenceofhiv1infectioninrussianmetropolitanareas
AT shipulinga serologicaldiagnosisandprevalenceofhiv1infectioninrussianmetropolitanareas
AT semenovav serologicaldiagnosisandprevalenceofhiv1infectioninrussianmetropolitanareas
AT tivanovaev serologicaldiagnosisandprevalenceofhiv1infectioninrussianmetropolitanareas
AT kolyasnikovanm serologicaldiagnosisandprevalenceofhiv1infectioninrussianmetropolitanareas
AT zuevaeb serologicaldiagnosisandprevalenceofhiv1infectioninrussianmetropolitanareas
AT pokrovskiyvv serologicaldiagnosisandprevalenceofhiv1infectioninrussianmetropolitanareas
AT gallic serologicaldiagnosisandprevalenceofhiv1infectioninrussianmetropolitanareas