Cargando…

Reliability and diagnostic performance of a new blood ketone and glucose meter in humans

BACKGROUND: Accurate and reliable monitoring of blood ketone and glucose levels is useful for athletes adhering to a ketogenic diet who want to verify that they are in a state of ketosis and, therefore, accruing performance adaptations. However, the cost of devices and testing materials may prohibit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Andrew Ray, Holland-Winkler, Angelia Maleah, Ansley, Jenna Kate, Boone, Eric Deiondre Hunter, Schulte, Megahn Kimberanne O’Reilly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7791747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-020-00404-2
_version_ 1783633657857048576
author Moore, Andrew Ray
Holland-Winkler, Angelia Maleah
Ansley, Jenna Kate
Boone, Eric Deiondre Hunter
Schulte, Megahn Kimberanne O’Reilly
author_facet Moore, Andrew Ray
Holland-Winkler, Angelia Maleah
Ansley, Jenna Kate
Boone, Eric Deiondre Hunter
Schulte, Megahn Kimberanne O’Reilly
author_sort Moore, Andrew Ray
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate and reliable monitoring of blood ketone and glucose levels is useful for athletes adhering to a ketogenic diet who want to verify that they are in a state of ketosis and, therefore, accruing performance adaptations. However, the cost of devices and testing materials may prohibit their use. More affordable field testing systems are available, but their accuracy and reliability remain in question. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the agreement between a previously validated ketone and glucose meter (Meter 1 – Precision Xtra) and a more affordable meter that has not been validated (Meter 2 – Keto-Mojo), and also to assess the diagnostic performance of Meter 2 for identifying nutritional ketosis. METHODS: Thirteen participants (7 females and 6 males; 21.6 ± 3.0 years old) visited the laboratory three times in this randomized, double-blind cross-over design study. Ketone and glucose levels were measured with Meter 1 and Meter 2 twice before and twice after ingestion of a racemic ketone, natural ketone, or maltodextrin supplement. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimates and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated to evaluate interrater reliability for Meter 1 and Meter 2. Bland-Altman plots were constructed to visually assess the agreement between devices. Area under the ROC curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic ability of Meter 2 to detect nutritional ketosis at a threshold ketone level of 0.5 mM as identified by Meter 1. RESULTS: Reliability between the meters was excellent for measuring ketones (ICC = .968; .942–.981) and good for measuring glucose (ICC = .809; .642–.893), though the Bland-Altman plot revealed substantial differences in agreement for measuring glucose. Area under the ROC curve (Area = 0.913; 0.828–0.998) was excellent for diagnosing nutritional ketosis. CONCLUSIONS: Both Meter 1 and Meter 2 displayed excellent agreement between each other for ketone measurement. Meter 2 also displayed an excellent level of accuracy for diagnosing nutritional ketosis at a threshold value of 0.5 mM, making it an effective and affordable alternative to more expensive testing devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7791747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77917472021-01-11 Reliability and diagnostic performance of a new blood ketone and glucose meter in humans Moore, Andrew Ray Holland-Winkler, Angelia Maleah Ansley, Jenna Kate Boone, Eric Deiondre Hunter Schulte, Megahn Kimberanne O’Reilly J Int Soc Sports Nutr Research Article BACKGROUND: Accurate and reliable monitoring of blood ketone and glucose levels is useful for athletes adhering to a ketogenic diet who want to verify that they are in a state of ketosis and, therefore, accruing performance adaptations. However, the cost of devices and testing materials may prohibit their use. More affordable field testing systems are available, but their accuracy and reliability remain in question. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the agreement between a previously validated ketone and glucose meter (Meter 1 – Precision Xtra) and a more affordable meter that has not been validated (Meter 2 – Keto-Mojo), and also to assess the diagnostic performance of Meter 2 for identifying nutritional ketosis. METHODS: Thirteen participants (7 females and 6 males; 21.6 ± 3.0 years old) visited the laboratory three times in this randomized, double-blind cross-over design study. Ketone and glucose levels were measured with Meter 1 and Meter 2 twice before and twice after ingestion of a racemic ketone, natural ketone, or maltodextrin supplement. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimates and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated to evaluate interrater reliability for Meter 1 and Meter 2. Bland-Altman plots were constructed to visually assess the agreement between devices. Area under the ROC curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic ability of Meter 2 to detect nutritional ketosis at a threshold ketone level of 0.5 mM as identified by Meter 1. RESULTS: Reliability between the meters was excellent for measuring ketones (ICC = .968; .942–.981) and good for measuring glucose (ICC = .809; .642–.893), though the Bland-Altman plot revealed substantial differences in agreement for measuring glucose. Area under the ROC curve (Area = 0.913; 0.828–0.998) was excellent for diagnosing nutritional ketosis. CONCLUSIONS: Both Meter 1 and Meter 2 displayed excellent agreement between each other for ketone measurement. Meter 2 also displayed an excellent level of accuracy for diagnosing nutritional ketosis at a threshold value of 0.5 mM, making it an effective and affordable alternative to more expensive testing devices. BioMed Central 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7791747/ /pubmed/33413456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-020-00404-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Moore, Andrew Ray
Holland-Winkler, Angelia Maleah
Ansley, Jenna Kate
Boone, Eric Deiondre Hunter
Schulte, Megahn Kimberanne O’Reilly
Reliability and diagnostic performance of a new blood ketone and glucose meter in humans
title Reliability and diagnostic performance of a new blood ketone and glucose meter in humans
title_full Reliability and diagnostic performance of a new blood ketone and glucose meter in humans
title_fullStr Reliability and diagnostic performance of a new blood ketone and glucose meter in humans
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and diagnostic performance of a new blood ketone and glucose meter in humans
title_short Reliability and diagnostic performance of a new blood ketone and glucose meter in humans
title_sort reliability and diagnostic performance of a new blood ketone and glucose meter in humans
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7791747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-020-00404-2
work_keys_str_mv AT mooreandrewray reliabilityanddiagnosticperformanceofanewbloodketoneandglucosemeterinhumans
AT hollandwinklerangeliamaleah reliabilityanddiagnosticperformanceofanewbloodketoneandglucosemeterinhumans
AT ansleyjennakate reliabilityanddiagnosticperformanceofanewbloodketoneandglucosemeterinhumans
AT booneericdeiondrehunter reliabilityanddiagnosticperformanceofanewbloodketoneandglucosemeterinhumans
AT schultemegahnkimberanneoreilly reliabilityanddiagnosticperformanceofanewbloodketoneandglucosemeterinhumans