Cargando…

Assessment of implant surface and instrument insert changes due to instrumentation with different tips for ultrasonic-driven debridement

BACKGROUND: To assess the changes of implant surfaces of different roughness after instrumentation with ultrasonic-driven scaler tips of different materials. METHODS: Experiments were performed on two moderately rough surfaces (I—Inicell® and II—SLA®), one surface without pre-treatment (III) and one...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sahrmann, Philipp, Winkler, Sophie, Gubler, Andrea, Attin, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7791805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01384-0
_version_ 1783633671035551744
author Sahrmann, Philipp
Winkler, Sophie
Gubler, Andrea
Attin, Thomas
author_facet Sahrmann, Philipp
Winkler, Sophie
Gubler, Andrea
Attin, Thomas
author_sort Sahrmann, Philipp
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess the changes of implant surfaces of different roughness after instrumentation with ultrasonic-driven scaler tips of different materials. METHODS: Experiments were performed on two moderately rough surfaces (I—Inicell® and II—SLA®), one surface without pre-treatment (III) and one smooth machined surface (IV). Scaler tips made of steel (A), PEEK (B), titanium (C), carbon (D) and resin (E) were used for instrumentation with a standardized pressure of 100 g for ten seconds and under continuous automatic motion. Each combination of scaler tip and implant surface was performed three times on 8 titanium discs. After instrumentation roughness was assessed by profilometry, morphological changes were assessed by scanning electron microscopy, and element distribution on the utmost surface by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. RESULTS: The surface roughness of discs I and II were significantly reduced by instrumentation with all tips except E. For disc III and IV roughness was enhanced by tip A and C and, only for IV, by tip D. Instrumentation with tips B, D and E left extensive residuals on surface I, II and III. The element analysis of these deposits proved consistent with the elemental composition of the respective tip materials. CONCLUSION: All ultrasonic instruments led to microscopic alterations of all types of implants surfaces assessed in the present study. The least change of implant surfaces might result from resin or carbon tips on machined surfaces.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7791805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77918052021-01-11 Assessment of implant surface and instrument insert changes due to instrumentation with different tips for ultrasonic-driven debridement Sahrmann, Philipp Winkler, Sophie Gubler, Andrea Attin, Thomas BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: To assess the changes of implant surfaces of different roughness after instrumentation with ultrasonic-driven scaler tips of different materials. METHODS: Experiments were performed on two moderately rough surfaces (I—Inicell® and II—SLA®), one surface without pre-treatment (III) and one smooth machined surface (IV). Scaler tips made of steel (A), PEEK (B), titanium (C), carbon (D) and resin (E) were used for instrumentation with a standardized pressure of 100 g for ten seconds and under continuous automatic motion. Each combination of scaler tip and implant surface was performed three times on 8 titanium discs. After instrumentation roughness was assessed by profilometry, morphological changes were assessed by scanning electron microscopy, and element distribution on the utmost surface by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. RESULTS: The surface roughness of discs I and II were significantly reduced by instrumentation with all tips except E. For disc III and IV roughness was enhanced by tip A and C and, only for IV, by tip D. Instrumentation with tips B, D and E left extensive residuals on surface I, II and III. The element analysis of these deposits proved consistent with the elemental composition of the respective tip materials. CONCLUSION: All ultrasonic instruments led to microscopic alterations of all types of implants surfaces assessed in the present study. The least change of implant surfaces might result from resin or carbon tips on machined surfaces. BioMed Central 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7791805/ /pubmed/33413296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01384-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sahrmann, Philipp
Winkler, Sophie
Gubler, Andrea
Attin, Thomas
Assessment of implant surface and instrument insert changes due to instrumentation with different tips for ultrasonic-driven debridement
title Assessment of implant surface and instrument insert changes due to instrumentation with different tips for ultrasonic-driven debridement
title_full Assessment of implant surface and instrument insert changes due to instrumentation with different tips for ultrasonic-driven debridement
title_fullStr Assessment of implant surface and instrument insert changes due to instrumentation with different tips for ultrasonic-driven debridement
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of implant surface and instrument insert changes due to instrumentation with different tips for ultrasonic-driven debridement
title_short Assessment of implant surface and instrument insert changes due to instrumentation with different tips for ultrasonic-driven debridement
title_sort assessment of implant surface and instrument insert changes due to instrumentation with different tips for ultrasonic-driven debridement
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7791805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01384-0
work_keys_str_mv AT sahrmannphilipp assessmentofimplantsurfaceandinstrumentinsertchangesduetoinstrumentationwithdifferenttipsforultrasonicdrivendebridement
AT winklersophie assessmentofimplantsurfaceandinstrumentinsertchangesduetoinstrumentationwithdifferenttipsforultrasonicdrivendebridement
AT gublerandrea assessmentofimplantsurfaceandinstrumentinsertchangesduetoinstrumentationwithdifferenttipsforultrasonicdrivendebridement
AT attinthomas assessmentofimplantsurfaceandinstrumentinsertchangesduetoinstrumentationwithdifferenttipsforultrasonicdrivendebridement