Cargando…
How decisive is the number of distal arterial anastomoses in coronary bypass surgery?
BACKGROUND: The benefit of arterial revascularization in coronary surgery remains controversial. The incremental value of additional grafts to the left internal thoracic artery (ITA) has been mainly assessed according to the number of arterial grafts, possibly limiting the detection of its actual im...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-020-01384-9 |
_version_ | 1783633724486713344 |
---|---|
author | Jegaden, Olivier J. L. Farhat, Fadi Jegaden, Margaux P. O. Hassan, Amar O. Lapeze, Joel Eker, Armand |
author_facet | Jegaden, Olivier J. L. Farhat, Fadi Jegaden, Margaux P. O. Hassan, Amar O. Lapeze, Joel Eker, Armand |
author_sort | Jegaden, Olivier J. L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The benefit of arterial revascularization in coronary surgery remains controversial. The incremental value of additional grafts to the left internal thoracic artery (ITA) has been mainly assessed according to the number of arterial grafts, possibly limiting the detection of its actual impact. We analyzed the influence of the number of distal arterial anastomoses (DAA) performed on late mortality in patients having received from one to three arterial grafts. METHODS: Retrospective review of 3685 primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed from 1989 to 2014 was conducted with a 13-year mean follow-up. One arterial graft (SITA) was used in 969 patients, two arterial grafts, ITA or gastroepiploic artery (GEA), in 1883 patients (BITA: 1644; SITA+GEA: 239), and three arterial grafts in 833 patients (BITA+GEA). Totally, 795 patients (22%) received one DAA, 1142 patients (31%) two, 1337 patients (36%) three, and 411 patients (11%) four or more. A sub-group analysis was done in the 2104 patients with 3-vessel disease who received at least 2 arterial grafts. RESULTS: In this series the early mortality was 1.6% and it was not influenced by the surgical technique. Late mortality was significantly influenced by age, gender, heart failure, LV ejection fraction, diabetes status, complete revascularization, number of arterial grafts, number of DAA, both ITA, sequential ITA graft, GEA graft. In multivariable analysis with Cox regression model, the number of DAA was the only technical significant independent prognosis factor of late survival (p < 0.0001), predominant over both ITA, complete revascularization and number of arterial grafts. The impact of the number of DAA on survival was found discriminant from 1 to 3; after 3 there was no more additional effect. In 3-vessel disease patients who received at least 2 arterial grafts, the number of DAA remained a significant independent prognosis factor of late survival (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The number of distal arterial anastomoses is an independent predictor of long-term survival, predominant over the number of arterial grafts and the completeness of the revascularization; higher the number, better the late survival. It is a strong support of the extensive use of arterial grafting in CABG. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7792060 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77920602021-01-11 How decisive is the number of distal arterial anastomoses in coronary bypass surgery? Jegaden, Olivier J. L. Farhat, Fadi Jegaden, Margaux P. O. Hassan, Amar O. Lapeze, Joel Eker, Armand J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: The benefit of arterial revascularization in coronary surgery remains controversial. The incremental value of additional grafts to the left internal thoracic artery (ITA) has been mainly assessed according to the number of arterial grafts, possibly limiting the detection of its actual impact. We analyzed the influence of the number of distal arterial anastomoses (DAA) performed on late mortality in patients having received from one to three arterial grafts. METHODS: Retrospective review of 3685 primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed from 1989 to 2014 was conducted with a 13-year mean follow-up. One arterial graft (SITA) was used in 969 patients, two arterial grafts, ITA or gastroepiploic artery (GEA), in 1883 patients (BITA: 1644; SITA+GEA: 239), and three arterial grafts in 833 patients (BITA+GEA). Totally, 795 patients (22%) received one DAA, 1142 patients (31%) two, 1337 patients (36%) three, and 411 patients (11%) four or more. A sub-group analysis was done in the 2104 patients with 3-vessel disease who received at least 2 arterial grafts. RESULTS: In this series the early mortality was 1.6% and it was not influenced by the surgical technique. Late mortality was significantly influenced by age, gender, heart failure, LV ejection fraction, diabetes status, complete revascularization, number of arterial grafts, number of DAA, both ITA, sequential ITA graft, GEA graft. In multivariable analysis with Cox regression model, the number of DAA was the only technical significant independent prognosis factor of late survival (p < 0.0001), predominant over both ITA, complete revascularization and number of arterial grafts. The impact of the number of DAA on survival was found discriminant from 1 to 3; after 3 there was no more additional effect. In 3-vessel disease patients who received at least 2 arterial grafts, the number of DAA remained a significant independent prognosis factor of late survival (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The number of distal arterial anastomoses is an independent predictor of long-term survival, predominant over the number of arterial grafts and the completeness of the revascularization; higher the number, better the late survival. It is a strong support of the extensive use of arterial grafting in CABG. BioMed Central 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7792060/ /pubmed/33413537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-020-01384-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jegaden, Olivier J. L. Farhat, Fadi Jegaden, Margaux P. O. Hassan, Amar O. Lapeze, Joel Eker, Armand How decisive is the number of distal arterial anastomoses in coronary bypass surgery? |
title | How decisive is the number of distal arterial anastomoses in coronary bypass surgery? |
title_full | How decisive is the number of distal arterial anastomoses in coronary bypass surgery? |
title_fullStr | How decisive is the number of distal arterial anastomoses in coronary bypass surgery? |
title_full_unstemmed | How decisive is the number of distal arterial anastomoses in coronary bypass surgery? |
title_short | How decisive is the number of distal arterial anastomoses in coronary bypass surgery? |
title_sort | how decisive is the number of distal arterial anastomoses in coronary bypass surgery? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-020-01384-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jegadenolivierjl howdecisiveisthenumberofdistalarterialanastomosesincoronarybypasssurgery AT farhatfadi howdecisiveisthenumberofdistalarterialanastomosesincoronarybypasssurgery AT jegadenmargauxpo howdecisiveisthenumberofdistalarterialanastomosesincoronarybypasssurgery AT hassanamaro howdecisiveisthenumberofdistalarterialanastomosesincoronarybypasssurgery AT lapezejoel howdecisiveisthenumberofdistalarterialanastomosesincoronarybypasssurgery AT ekerarmand howdecisiveisthenumberofdistalarterialanastomosesincoronarybypasssurgery |