Cargando…
Consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC): development and dimensionality of a questionnaire
BACKGROUND: Harms of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening include psychosocial consequences. We have not identified studies using a participant-relevant questionnaire with adequate measurement properties to investigate these harms. However, Brodersen et al. have previously developed a core questionnair...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00504-3 |
_version_ | 1783633748109033472 |
---|---|
author | Malmqvist, Jessica Siersma, Volkert Bang, Christine Winther Brodersen, John |
author_facet | Malmqvist, Jessica Siersma, Volkert Bang, Christine Winther Brodersen, John |
author_sort | Malmqvist, Jessica |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Harms of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening include psychosocial consequences. We have not identified studies using a participant-relevant questionnaire with adequate measurement properties to investigate these harms. However, Brodersen et al. have previously developed a core questionnaire consequences of screening (COS) for use in screening for life-threatening diseases. Therefore, the objectives were: (1) To investigate content validity of COS in a CRC screening setting and in case of gaps in content coverage (2) generate new items and themes and (3) test the possibly extended version of COS for dimensionality and differential item functioning (DIF) using Rasch Models. METHODS: We performed two-part-focus-groups with CRC screenees. Screenees were recruited by strategic sampling. In the first part 16 screenees with false-positive results (n = 7) and low-risk polyps (n = 9) were interviewed about their CRC screening experiences and in the second part COS was examined for content validity. When new information was developed in the focus groups, new items covering this topic were generated. Subsequently, new items were, together with COS, tested in the subsequent interviews. A random subsample (n = 410) from a longitudinal questionnaire study, not yet published, was used to form the data for this paper. We analysed multidimensionality and uniform DIF with Andersen’s conditional likelihood ratio test. We assessed individual item fit to the model. We also analysed Local Dependence (LD) and DIF by partial gamma coefficients using Rasch Models. RESULTS: COS was found relevant in a CRC screening setting. However, new information was discovered in the focus groups, covered by 18 new CRC screening-specific items. The Rasch analyses only revealed minor problems in the COS-scales. The 18 new items were distributed on four new CRC screening-specific dimensions and one single item. CONCLUSION: An extended version of COS specifically for use in a CRC screening setting has been developed. The extended part encompasses four new scales and one new single item. The original COS with the CRC-screening specific extension is called consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC). COS-CRC possessed reliability, unidimensionality and invariant measurement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7792180 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77921802021-01-11 Consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC): development and dimensionality of a questionnaire Malmqvist, Jessica Siersma, Volkert Bang, Christine Winther Brodersen, John BMC Psychol Research Article BACKGROUND: Harms of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening include psychosocial consequences. We have not identified studies using a participant-relevant questionnaire with adequate measurement properties to investigate these harms. However, Brodersen et al. have previously developed a core questionnaire consequences of screening (COS) for use in screening for life-threatening diseases. Therefore, the objectives were: (1) To investigate content validity of COS in a CRC screening setting and in case of gaps in content coverage (2) generate new items and themes and (3) test the possibly extended version of COS for dimensionality and differential item functioning (DIF) using Rasch Models. METHODS: We performed two-part-focus-groups with CRC screenees. Screenees were recruited by strategic sampling. In the first part 16 screenees with false-positive results (n = 7) and low-risk polyps (n = 9) were interviewed about their CRC screening experiences and in the second part COS was examined for content validity. When new information was developed in the focus groups, new items covering this topic were generated. Subsequently, new items were, together with COS, tested in the subsequent interviews. A random subsample (n = 410) from a longitudinal questionnaire study, not yet published, was used to form the data for this paper. We analysed multidimensionality and uniform DIF with Andersen’s conditional likelihood ratio test. We assessed individual item fit to the model. We also analysed Local Dependence (LD) and DIF by partial gamma coefficients using Rasch Models. RESULTS: COS was found relevant in a CRC screening setting. However, new information was discovered in the focus groups, covered by 18 new CRC screening-specific items. The Rasch analyses only revealed minor problems in the COS-scales. The 18 new items were distributed on four new CRC screening-specific dimensions and one single item. CONCLUSION: An extended version of COS specifically for use in a CRC screening setting has been developed. The extended part encompasses four new scales and one new single item. The original COS with the CRC-screening specific extension is called consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC). COS-CRC possessed reliability, unidimensionality and invariant measurement. BioMed Central 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7792180/ /pubmed/33413695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00504-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Malmqvist, Jessica Siersma, Volkert Bang, Christine Winther Brodersen, John Consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC): development and dimensionality of a questionnaire |
title | Consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC): development and dimensionality of a questionnaire |
title_full | Consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC): development and dimensionality of a questionnaire |
title_fullStr | Consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC): development and dimensionality of a questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed | Consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC): development and dimensionality of a questionnaire |
title_short | Consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC): development and dimensionality of a questionnaire |
title_sort | consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (cos-crc): development and dimensionality of a questionnaire |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00504-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malmqvistjessica consequencesofscreeningincolorectalcancercoscrcdevelopmentanddimensionalityofaquestionnaire AT siersmavolkert consequencesofscreeningincolorectalcancercoscrcdevelopmentanddimensionalityofaquestionnaire AT bangchristinewinther consequencesofscreeningincolorectalcancercoscrcdevelopmentanddimensionalityofaquestionnaire AT brodersenjohn consequencesofscreeningincolorectalcancercoscrcdevelopmentanddimensionalityofaquestionnaire |