Cargando…

Consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC): development and dimensionality of a questionnaire

BACKGROUND: Harms of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening include psychosocial consequences. We have not identified studies using a participant-relevant questionnaire with adequate measurement properties to investigate these harms. However, Brodersen et al. have previously developed a core questionnair...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malmqvist, Jessica, Siersma, Volkert, Bang, Christine Winther, Brodersen, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00504-3
_version_ 1783633748109033472
author Malmqvist, Jessica
Siersma, Volkert
Bang, Christine Winther
Brodersen, John
author_facet Malmqvist, Jessica
Siersma, Volkert
Bang, Christine Winther
Brodersen, John
author_sort Malmqvist, Jessica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Harms of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening include psychosocial consequences. We have not identified studies using a participant-relevant questionnaire with adequate measurement properties to investigate these harms. However, Brodersen et al. have previously developed a core questionnaire consequences of screening (COS) for use in screening for life-threatening diseases. Therefore, the objectives were: (1) To investigate content validity of COS in a CRC screening setting and in case of gaps in content coverage (2) generate new items and themes and (3) test the possibly extended version of COS for dimensionality and differential item functioning (DIF) using Rasch Models. METHODS: We performed two-part-focus-groups with CRC screenees. Screenees were recruited by strategic sampling. In the first part 16 screenees with false-positive results (n = 7) and low-risk polyps (n = 9) were interviewed about their CRC screening experiences and in the second part COS was examined for content validity. When new information was developed in the focus groups, new items covering this topic were generated. Subsequently, new items were, together with COS, tested in the subsequent interviews. A random subsample (n = 410) from a longitudinal questionnaire study, not yet published, was used to form the data for this paper. We analysed multidimensionality and uniform DIF with Andersen’s conditional likelihood ratio test. We assessed individual item fit to the model. We also analysed Local Dependence (LD) and DIF by partial gamma coefficients using Rasch Models. RESULTS: COS was found relevant in a CRC screening setting. However, new information was discovered in the focus groups, covered by 18 new CRC screening-specific items. The Rasch analyses only revealed minor problems in the COS-scales. The 18 new items were distributed on four new CRC screening-specific dimensions and one single item. CONCLUSION: An extended version of COS specifically for use in a CRC screening setting has been developed. The extended part encompasses four new scales and one new single item. The original COS with the CRC-screening specific extension is called consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC). COS-CRC possessed reliability, unidimensionality and invariant measurement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7792180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77921802021-01-11 Consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC): development and dimensionality of a questionnaire Malmqvist, Jessica Siersma, Volkert Bang, Christine Winther Brodersen, John BMC Psychol Research Article BACKGROUND: Harms of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening include psychosocial consequences. We have not identified studies using a participant-relevant questionnaire with adequate measurement properties to investigate these harms. However, Brodersen et al. have previously developed a core questionnaire consequences of screening (COS) for use in screening for life-threatening diseases. Therefore, the objectives were: (1) To investigate content validity of COS in a CRC screening setting and in case of gaps in content coverage (2) generate new items and themes and (3) test the possibly extended version of COS for dimensionality and differential item functioning (DIF) using Rasch Models. METHODS: We performed two-part-focus-groups with CRC screenees. Screenees were recruited by strategic sampling. In the first part 16 screenees with false-positive results (n = 7) and low-risk polyps (n = 9) were interviewed about their CRC screening experiences and in the second part COS was examined for content validity. When new information was developed in the focus groups, new items covering this topic were generated. Subsequently, new items were, together with COS, tested in the subsequent interviews. A random subsample (n = 410) from a longitudinal questionnaire study, not yet published, was used to form the data for this paper. We analysed multidimensionality and uniform DIF with Andersen’s conditional likelihood ratio test. We assessed individual item fit to the model. We also analysed Local Dependence (LD) and DIF by partial gamma coefficients using Rasch Models. RESULTS: COS was found relevant in a CRC screening setting. However, new information was discovered in the focus groups, covered by 18 new CRC screening-specific items. The Rasch analyses only revealed minor problems in the COS-scales. The 18 new items were distributed on four new CRC screening-specific dimensions and one single item. CONCLUSION: An extended version of COS specifically for use in a CRC screening setting has been developed. The extended part encompasses four new scales and one new single item. The original COS with the CRC-screening specific extension is called consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC). COS-CRC possessed reliability, unidimensionality and invariant measurement. BioMed Central 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7792180/ /pubmed/33413695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00504-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Malmqvist, Jessica
Siersma, Volkert
Bang, Christine Winther
Brodersen, John
Consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC): development and dimensionality of a questionnaire
title Consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC): development and dimensionality of a questionnaire
title_full Consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC): development and dimensionality of a questionnaire
title_fullStr Consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC): development and dimensionality of a questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC): development and dimensionality of a questionnaire
title_short Consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC): development and dimensionality of a questionnaire
title_sort consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (cos-crc): development and dimensionality of a questionnaire
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00504-3
work_keys_str_mv AT malmqvistjessica consequencesofscreeningincolorectalcancercoscrcdevelopmentanddimensionalityofaquestionnaire
AT siersmavolkert consequencesofscreeningincolorectalcancercoscrcdevelopmentanddimensionalityofaquestionnaire
AT bangchristinewinther consequencesofscreeningincolorectalcancercoscrcdevelopmentanddimensionalityofaquestionnaire
AT brodersenjohn consequencesofscreeningincolorectalcancercoscrcdevelopmentanddimensionalityofaquestionnaire