Cargando…

Effects of Sugar‐Sweetened, Artificially Sweetened, and Unsweetened Beverages on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors, Body Composition, and Sweet Taste Preference: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: A 2018 American Heart Association science advisory indicated that, pending further research, artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs) may be an appropriate initial replacement for sugar‐sweetened beverages (SSBs) during transition to unsweetened beverages (USBs). METHODS AND RESULTS: We r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ebbeling, Cara B., Feldman, Henry A., Steltz, Sarah K., Quinn, Nicolle L., Robinson, Lisa M., Ludwig, David S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32696704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.015668
_version_ 1783633761504591872
author Ebbeling, Cara B.
Feldman, Henry A.
Steltz, Sarah K.
Quinn, Nicolle L.
Robinson, Lisa M.
Ludwig, David S.
author_facet Ebbeling, Cara B.
Feldman, Henry A.
Steltz, Sarah K.
Quinn, Nicolle L.
Robinson, Lisa M.
Ludwig, David S.
author_sort Ebbeling, Cara B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A 2018 American Heart Association science advisory indicated that, pending further research, artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs) may be an appropriate initial replacement for sugar‐sweetened beverages (SSBs) during transition to unsweetened beverages (USBs). METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomly assigned 203 adults (121 males, 82 females; 91.6% retention), who habitually consumed SSBs, to 3 groups and delivered free SSBs, ASBs, or USBs to their homes for 12 months. Outcomes included serum triglyceride to high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (primary), body weight, and sweet taste preference (experimental assessment, 0%–18% sucrose solutions). Change in serum triglyceride to high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio was not different between groups. Although overall change in weight also was not different between groups, we found effect modification (P=0.006) by central adiposity. Among participants in the highest tertile of baseline trunk fat but not other tertiles, weight gain was greater (P=0.002) for the SSB (4.4±1.0 kg, estimate±SE) compared with ASB (0.5±0.9 kg) or USB (−0.2±0.9 kg) group. Both sweetness threshold (–1.0±0.2% m/v; P=0.005) and favorite concentration (–2.3±0.4% m/v; P<0.0001) decreased in the USB group; neither changed in the SSB group. In the ASB group, sweetness threshold did not change, and favorite concentration decreased (–1.1±0.5% m/v; P=0.02). Pairwise comparison between the ASB and USB groups indicated a difference in sweetness threshold (P=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Replacing SSBs with noncaloric beverages for 12 months did not affect serum triglyceride to high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio. Among individuals with central adiposity, replacing SSBs with either ASBs or USBs lowered body weight. However, USBs may have the most favorable effect on sweet taste preference. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; unique identifier: NCT01295671.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7792240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77922402021-01-15 Effects of Sugar‐Sweetened, Artificially Sweetened, and Unsweetened Beverages on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors, Body Composition, and Sweet Taste Preference: A Randomized Controlled Trial Ebbeling, Cara B. Feldman, Henry A. Steltz, Sarah K. Quinn, Nicolle L. Robinson, Lisa M. Ludwig, David S. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: A 2018 American Heart Association science advisory indicated that, pending further research, artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs) may be an appropriate initial replacement for sugar‐sweetened beverages (SSBs) during transition to unsweetened beverages (USBs). METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomly assigned 203 adults (121 males, 82 females; 91.6% retention), who habitually consumed SSBs, to 3 groups and delivered free SSBs, ASBs, or USBs to their homes for 12 months. Outcomes included serum triglyceride to high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (primary), body weight, and sweet taste preference (experimental assessment, 0%–18% sucrose solutions). Change in serum triglyceride to high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio was not different between groups. Although overall change in weight also was not different between groups, we found effect modification (P=0.006) by central adiposity. Among participants in the highest tertile of baseline trunk fat but not other tertiles, weight gain was greater (P=0.002) for the SSB (4.4±1.0 kg, estimate±SE) compared with ASB (0.5±0.9 kg) or USB (−0.2±0.9 kg) group. Both sweetness threshold (–1.0±0.2% m/v; P=0.005) and favorite concentration (–2.3±0.4% m/v; P<0.0001) decreased in the USB group; neither changed in the SSB group. In the ASB group, sweetness threshold did not change, and favorite concentration decreased (–1.1±0.5% m/v; P=0.02). Pairwise comparison between the ASB and USB groups indicated a difference in sweetness threshold (P=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Replacing SSBs with noncaloric beverages for 12 months did not affect serum triglyceride to high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio. Among individuals with central adiposity, replacing SSBs with either ASBs or USBs lowered body weight. However, USBs may have the most favorable effect on sweet taste preference. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; unique identifier: NCT01295671. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7792240/ /pubmed/32696704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.015668 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ebbeling, Cara B.
Feldman, Henry A.
Steltz, Sarah K.
Quinn, Nicolle L.
Robinson, Lisa M.
Ludwig, David S.
Effects of Sugar‐Sweetened, Artificially Sweetened, and Unsweetened Beverages on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors, Body Composition, and Sweet Taste Preference: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Effects of Sugar‐Sweetened, Artificially Sweetened, and Unsweetened Beverages on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors, Body Composition, and Sweet Taste Preference: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Effects of Sugar‐Sweetened, Artificially Sweetened, and Unsweetened Beverages on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors, Body Composition, and Sweet Taste Preference: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Effects of Sugar‐Sweetened, Artificially Sweetened, and Unsweetened Beverages on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors, Body Composition, and Sweet Taste Preference: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Sugar‐Sweetened, Artificially Sweetened, and Unsweetened Beverages on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors, Body Composition, and Sweet Taste Preference: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Effects of Sugar‐Sweetened, Artificially Sweetened, and Unsweetened Beverages on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors, Body Composition, and Sweet Taste Preference: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort effects of sugar‐sweetened, artificially sweetened, and unsweetened beverages on cardiometabolic risk factors, body composition, and sweet taste preference: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32696704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.015668
work_keys_str_mv AT ebbelingcarab effectsofsugarsweetenedartificiallysweetenedandunsweetenedbeveragesoncardiometabolicriskfactorsbodycompositionandsweettastepreferencearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT feldmanhenrya effectsofsugarsweetenedartificiallysweetenedandunsweetenedbeveragesoncardiometabolicriskfactorsbodycompositionandsweettastepreferencearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT steltzsarahk effectsofsugarsweetenedartificiallysweetenedandunsweetenedbeveragesoncardiometabolicriskfactorsbodycompositionandsweettastepreferencearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT quinnnicollel effectsofsugarsweetenedartificiallysweetenedandunsweetenedbeveragesoncardiometabolicriskfactorsbodycompositionandsweettastepreferencearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT robinsonlisam effectsofsugarsweetenedartificiallysweetenedandunsweetenedbeveragesoncardiometabolicriskfactorsbodycompositionandsweettastepreferencearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ludwigdavids effectsofsugarsweetenedartificiallysweetenedandunsweetenedbeveragesoncardiometabolicriskfactorsbodycompositionandsweettastepreferencearandomizedcontrolledtrial