Cargando…
Optimal Revascularization Strategy in Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Culprit‐Only Versus One‐Stage Versus Multistage Revascularization
BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated optimal revascularization strategies in non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease. We investigated 3‐year clinical outcomes according to revascularization strategy in patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32750302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.016575 |
_version_ | 1783633767877836800 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Min Chul Hyun, Ju Yong Ahn, Youngkeun Bae, SungA Hyun, Dae Young Cho, Kyung Hoon Sim, Doo Sun Hong, Young Joon Kim, Ju Han Jeong, Myung Ho Kim, Hyo‐Soo Gwon, Hyeon Cheol Seong, In Whan Hwang, Kyoung‐Kook Chae, Shung Chull Hur, Seung Ho Cha, Kwang Soo Oh, Seok Kyu |
author_facet | Kim, Min Chul Hyun, Ju Yong Ahn, Youngkeun Bae, SungA Hyun, Dae Young Cho, Kyung Hoon Sim, Doo Sun Hong, Young Joon Kim, Ju Han Jeong, Myung Ho Kim, Hyo‐Soo Gwon, Hyeon Cheol Seong, In Whan Hwang, Kyoung‐Kook Chae, Shung Chull Hur, Seung Ho Cha, Kwang Soo Oh, Seok Kyu |
author_sort | Kim, Min Chul |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated optimal revascularization strategies in non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease. We investigated 3‐year clinical outcomes according to revascularization strategy in patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective, observational, multicenter study included patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease without cardiogenic shock. Data were analyzed at 3 years according to the percutaneous coronary intervention strategy: culprit‐only revascularization (COR), 1‐stage multivessel revascularization (MVR), and multistage MVR. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE: a composite of all‐cause death, nonfatal spontaneous myocardial infarction, or any repeat revascularization). The COR group had a higher risk of MACE than those involving other strategies (COR versus 1‐stage MVR; hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.54–0.77; P<0.001; and COR versus multistage MVR; hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.57–0.97; P=0.027). There was no significant difference in the incidence of MACE between 1‐stage and multistage MVR (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.86–1.51; P=0.355). The results were consistent after multivariate regression, propensity score matching, inverse probability weighting, and Bayesian proportional hazards modeling. In subgroup analyses stratified by the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score, 1‐stage MVR lowered the risk of MACE compared with multistage MVR in low‐to‐intermediate risk patients but not in patients at high risk. CONCLUSIONS: MVR reduced 3‐year MACE in patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease compared with COR. However, 1‐stage MVR was not superior to multistage MVR for reducing MACE except in low‐to‐intermediate risk patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7792267 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77922672021-01-15 Optimal Revascularization Strategy in Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Culprit‐Only Versus One‐Stage Versus Multistage Revascularization Kim, Min Chul Hyun, Ju Yong Ahn, Youngkeun Bae, SungA Hyun, Dae Young Cho, Kyung Hoon Sim, Doo Sun Hong, Young Joon Kim, Ju Han Jeong, Myung Ho Kim, Hyo‐Soo Gwon, Hyeon Cheol Seong, In Whan Hwang, Kyoung‐Kook Chae, Shung Chull Hur, Seung Ho Cha, Kwang Soo Oh, Seok Kyu J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated optimal revascularization strategies in non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease. We investigated 3‐year clinical outcomes according to revascularization strategy in patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective, observational, multicenter study included patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease without cardiogenic shock. Data were analyzed at 3 years according to the percutaneous coronary intervention strategy: culprit‐only revascularization (COR), 1‐stage multivessel revascularization (MVR), and multistage MVR. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE: a composite of all‐cause death, nonfatal spontaneous myocardial infarction, or any repeat revascularization). The COR group had a higher risk of MACE than those involving other strategies (COR versus 1‐stage MVR; hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.54–0.77; P<0.001; and COR versus multistage MVR; hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.57–0.97; P=0.027). There was no significant difference in the incidence of MACE between 1‐stage and multistage MVR (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.86–1.51; P=0.355). The results were consistent after multivariate regression, propensity score matching, inverse probability weighting, and Bayesian proportional hazards modeling. In subgroup analyses stratified by the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score, 1‐stage MVR lowered the risk of MACE compared with multistage MVR in low‐to‐intermediate risk patients but not in patients at high risk. CONCLUSIONS: MVR reduced 3‐year MACE in patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease compared with COR. However, 1‐stage MVR was not superior to multistage MVR for reducing MACE except in low‐to‐intermediate risk patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7792267/ /pubmed/32750302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.016575 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kim, Min Chul Hyun, Ju Yong Ahn, Youngkeun Bae, SungA Hyun, Dae Young Cho, Kyung Hoon Sim, Doo Sun Hong, Young Joon Kim, Ju Han Jeong, Myung Ho Kim, Hyo‐Soo Gwon, Hyeon Cheol Seong, In Whan Hwang, Kyoung‐Kook Chae, Shung Chull Hur, Seung Ho Cha, Kwang Soo Oh, Seok Kyu Optimal Revascularization Strategy in Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Culprit‐Only Versus One‐Stage Versus Multistage Revascularization |
title | Optimal Revascularization Strategy in Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Culprit‐Only Versus One‐Stage Versus Multistage Revascularization |
title_full | Optimal Revascularization Strategy in Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Culprit‐Only Versus One‐Stage Versus Multistage Revascularization |
title_fullStr | Optimal Revascularization Strategy in Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Culprit‐Only Versus One‐Stage Versus Multistage Revascularization |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal Revascularization Strategy in Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Culprit‐Only Versus One‐Stage Versus Multistage Revascularization |
title_short | Optimal Revascularization Strategy in Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Culprit‐Only Versus One‐Stage Versus Multistage Revascularization |
title_sort | optimal revascularization strategy in non–st‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel coronary artery disease: culprit‐only versus one‐stage versus multistage revascularization |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32750302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.016575 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimminchul optimalrevascularizationstrategyinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseculpritonlyversusonestageversusmultistagerevascularization AT hyunjuyong optimalrevascularizationstrategyinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseculpritonlyversusonestageversusmultistagerevascularization AT ahnyoungkeun optimalrevascularizationstrategyinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseculpritonlyversusonestageversusmultistagerevascularization AT baesunga optimalrevascularizationstrategyinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseculpritonlyversusonestageversusmultistagerevascularization AT hyundaeyoung optimalrevascularizationstrategyinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseculpritonlyversusonestageversusmultistagerevascularization AT chokyunghoon optimalrevascularizationstrategyinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseculpritonlyversusonestageversusmultistagerevascularization AT simdoosun optimalrevascularizationstrategyinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseculpritonlyversusonestageversusmultistagerevascularization AT hongyoungjoon optimalrevascularizationstrategyinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseculpritonlyversusonestageversusmultistagerevascularization AT kimjuhan optimalrevascularizationstrategyinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseculpritonlyversusonestageversusmultistagerevascularization AT jeongmyungho optimalrevascularizationstrategyinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseculpritonlyversusonestageversusmultistagerevascularization AT kimhyosoo optimalrevascularizationstrategyinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseculpritonlyversusonestageversusmultistagerevascularization AT gwonhyeoncheol optimalrevascularizationstrategyinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseculpritonlyversusonestageversusmultistagerevascularization AT seonginwhan optimalrevascularizationstrategyinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseculpritonlyversusonestageversusmultistagerevascularization AT hwangkyoungkook optimalrevascularizationstrategyinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseculpritonlyversusonestageversusmultistagerevascularization AT chaeshungchull optimalrevascularizationstrategyinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseculpritonlyversusonestageversusmultistagerevascularization AT hurseungho optimalrevascularizationstrategyinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseculpritonlyversusonestageversusmultistagerevascularization AT chakwangsoo optimalrevascularizationstrategyinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseculpritonlyversusonestageversusmultistagerevascularization AT ohseokkyu optimalrevascularizationstrategyinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseaseculpritonlyversusonestageversusmultistagerevascularization |