Cargando…

Overall assessment of antibiotic substitutes for pigs: a set of meta-analyses

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic growth promoters are widely used to improve weight gain. However, the abuse of antibiotics can have many negative effects on people. Developing alternatives to antibiotics is an urgent need in livestock production. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis and network meta-analysis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Bocheng, Fu, Jie, Zhu, Luoyi, Li, Zhi, Jin, Mingliang, Wang, Yizhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-020-00534-2
_version_ 1783633782871425024
author Xu, Bocheng
Fu, Jie
Zhu, Luoyi
Li, Zhi
Jin, Mingliang
Wang, Yizhen
author_facet Xu, Bocheng
Fu, Jie
Zhu, Luoyi
Li, Zhi
Jin, Mingliang
Wang, Yizhen
author_sort Xu, Bocheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antibiotic growth promoters are widely used to improve weight gain. However, the abuse of antibiotics can have many negative effects on people. Developing alternatives to antibiotics is an urgent need in livestock production. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) to investigate the effects of feed additives as potential antibiotic substitutes (ASs) on bacteriostasis, growth performance, intestinal morphology and immunity. Furthermore, the primary, secondary, and tertiary ASs were defined by comparing their results with the results of antibiotics. RESULTS: Among 16,309 identified studies, 37 were summarized to study the bacteriostasis effects of feed additives, and 89 were included in the meta-analysis and NMA (10,228 pigs). We summarized 268 associations of 57 interventions with 32 bacteria. The order of bacteriostasis effects was as follows: antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) ≈ antibiotics>organic acids>plant extracts>oligosaccharides. We detected associations of 11 feed additives and 11 outcomes. Compared with a basal diet, plant extract, AMPs, probiotics, microelements, organic acids, bacteriophages, lysozyme, zymin, and oligosaccharides significantly improved growth performance (P < 0.05); organic acids, probiotics, microelements, lysozyme, and AMPs remarkably increased the villus height:crypt depth ratio (V/C) (P < 0.05); and plant extracts, zymin, microelements, probiotics, and organic acids notably improved immunity (P < 0.05). The optimal AMP, bacteriophage, lysozyme, microelements, oligosaccharides, organic acids, plants, plant extracts, probiotics, and zymin doses were 0.100%, 0.150%, 0.012%, 0.010%, 0.050%, 0.750%, 0.20%, 0.040%, 0.180%, and 0.100%, respectively. Compared with antibiotics, all investigated feed additives exhibited no significant difference in effects on growth performance, IgG, and diarrhoea index/rate (P > 0.05); AMPs and microelements significantly increased V/C (P < 0.05); and zymin significantly improved lymphocyte levels (P < 0.05). Furthermore, linear weighting sum models were used to comprehensively estimate the overall impact of each feed additive on pig growth and health. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that AMPs and plant extracts can be used as primary ASs for weaned piglets and growing pigs, respectively. Bacteriophages, zymin, plants, probiotics, oligosaccharides, lysozyme, and microelements can be regarded as secondary ASs. Nucleotides and organic acids can be considered as tertiary ASs. Future studies should further assess the alternative effects of combinational feed additives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7792336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77923362021-01-11 Overall assessment of antibiotic substitutes for pigs: a set of meta-analyses Xu, Bocheng Fu, Jie Zhu, Luoyi Li, Zhi Jin, Mingliang Wang, Yizhen J Anim Sci Biotechnol Research BACKGROUND: Antibiotic growth promoters are widely used to improve weight gain. However, the abuse of antibiotics can have many negative effects on people. Developing alternatives to antibiotics is an urgent need in livestock production. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) to investigate the effects of feed additives as potential antibiotic substitutes (ASs) on bacteriostasis, growth performance, intestinal morphology and immunity. Furthermore, the primary, secondary, and tertiary ASs were defined by comparing their results with the results of antibiotics. RESULTS: Among 16,309 identified studies, 37 were summarized to study the bacteriostasis effects of feed additives, and 89 were included in the meta-analysis and NMA (10,228 pigs). We summarized 268 associations of 57 interventions with 32 bacteria. The order of bacteriostasis effects was as follows: antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) ≈ antibiotics>organic acids>plant extracts>oligosaccharides. We detected associations of 11 feed additives and 11 outcomes. Compared with a basal diet, plant extract, AMPs, probiotics, microelements, organic acids, bacteriophages, lysozyme, zymin, and oligosaccharides significantly improved growth performance (P < 0.05); organic acids, probiotics, microelements, lysozyme, and AMPs remarkably increased the villus height:crypt depth ratio (V/C) (P < 0.05); and plant extracts, zymin, microelements, probiotics, and organic acids notably improved immunity (P < 0.05). The optimal AMP, bacteriophage, lysozyme, microelements, oligosaccharides, organic acids, plants, plant extracts, probiotics, and zymin doses were 0.100%, 0.150%, 0.012%, 0.010%, 0.050%, 0.750%, 0.20%, 0.040%, 0.180%, and 0.100%, respectively. Compared with antibiotics, all investigated feed additives exhibited no significant difference in effects on growth performance, IgG, and diarrhoea index/rate (P > 0.05); AMPs and microelements significantly increased V/C (P < 0.05); and zymin significantly improved lymphocyte levels (P < 0.05). Furthermore, linear weighting sum models were used to comprehensively estimate the overall impact of each feed additive on pig growth and health. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that AMPs and plant extracts can be used as primary ASs for weaned piglets and growing pigs, respectively. Bacteriophages, zymin, plants, probiotics, oligosaccharides, lysozyme, and microelements can be regarded as secondary ASs. Nucleotides and organic acids can be considered as tertiary ASs. Future studies should further assess the alternative effects of combinational feed additives. BioMed Central 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7792336/ /pubmed/33413687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-020-00534-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Xu, Bocheng
Fu, Jie
Zhu, Luoyi
Li, Zhi
Jin, Mingliang
Wang, Yizhen
Overall assessment of antibiotic substitutes for pigs: a set of meta-analyses
title Overall assessment of antibiotic substitutes for pigs: a set of meta-analyses
title_full Overall assessment of antibiotic substitutes for pigs: a set of meta-analyses
title_fullStr Overall assessment of antibiotic substitutes for pigs: a set of meta-analyses
title_full_unstemmed Overall assessment of antibiotic substitutes for pigs: a set of meta-analyses
title_short Overall assessment of antibiotic substitutes for pigs: a set of meta-analyses
title_sort overall assessment of antibiotic substitutes for pigs: a set of meta-analyses
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-020-00534-2
work_keys_str_mv AT xubocheng overallassessmentofantibioticsubstitutesforpigsasetofmetaanalyses
AT fujie overallassessmentofantibioticsubstitutesforpigsasetofmetaanalyses
AT zhuluoyi overallassessmentofantibioticsubstitutesforpigsasetofmetaanalyses
AT lizhi overallassessmentofantibioticsubstitutesforpigsasetofmetaanalyses
AT jinmingliang overallassessmentofantibioticsubstitutesforpigsasetofmetaanalyses
AT wangyizhen overallassessmentofantibioticsubstitutesforpigsasetofmetaanalyses