Cargando…
Relation of Different Fruit and Vegetable Sources With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
BACKGROUND: Public health policies reflect concerns that certain fruit sources may not have the intended benefits and that vegetables should be preferred to fruit. We assessed the relation of fruit and vegetable sources with cardiovascular outcomes using a systematic review and meta‐analysis of pros...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33000670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.017728 |
_version_ | 1783633791881838592 |
---|---|
author | Zurbau, Andreea Au‐Yeung, Fei Blanco Mejia, Sonia Khan, Tauseef A. Vuksan, Vladimir Jovanovski, Elena Leiter, Lawrence A. Kendall, Cyril W. C. Jenkins, David J. A. Sievenpiper, John L. |
author_facet | Zurbau, Andreea Au‐Yeung, Fei Blanco Mejia, Sonia Khan, Tauseef A. Vuksan, Vladimir Jovanovski, Elena Leiter, Lawrence A. Kendall, Cyril W. C. Jenkins, David J. A. Sievenpiper, John L. |
author_sort | Zurbau, Andreea |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Public health policies reflect concerns that certain fruit sources may not have the intended benefits and that vegetables should be preferred to fruit. We assessed the relation of fruit and vegetable sources with cardiovascular outcomes using a systematic review and meta‐analysis of prospective cohort studies. METHODS AND RESULTS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched through June 3, 2019. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality (Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale). Data were pooled (fixed effects), and heterogeneity (Cochrane‐Q and I(2)) and certainty of the evidence (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) were assessed. Eighty‐one cohorts involving 4 031 896 individuals and 125 112 cardiovascular events were included. Total fruit and vegetables, fruit, and vegetables were associated with decreased cardiovascular disease (risk ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.89–0.96]; 0.91 [0.88–0.95]; and 0.94 [0.90–0.97], respectively), coronary heart disease (0.88 [0.83–0.92]; 0.88 [0.84–0.92]; and 0.92 [0.87–0.96], respectively), and stroke (0.82 [0.77–0.88], 0.82 [0.79–0.85]; and 0.88 [0.83–0.93], respectively) incidence. Total fruit and vegetables, fruit, and vegetables were associated with decreased cardiovascular disease (0.89 [0.85–0.93]; 0.88 [0.86–0.91]; and 0.87 [0.85–0.90], respectively), coronary heart disease (0.81 [0.72–0.92]; 0.86 [0.82–0.90]; and 0.86 [0.83–0.89], respectively), and stroke (0.73 [0.65–0.81]; 0.87 [0.84–0.91]; and 0.94 [0.90–0.99], respectively) mortality. There were greater benefits for citrus, 100% fruit juice, and pommes among fruit sources and allium, carrots, cruciferous, and green leafy among vegetable sources. No sources showed an adverse association. The certainty of the evidence was “very low” to “moderate,” with the highest for total fruit and/or vegetables, pommes fruit, and green leafy vegetables. CONCLUSIONS: Fruits and vegetables are associated with cardiovascular benefit, with some sources associated with greater benefit and none showing an adverse association. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03394339. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7792377 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77923772021-01-15 Relation of Different Fruit and Vegetable Sources With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies Zurbau, Andreea Au‐Yeung, Fei Blanco Mejia, Sonia Khan, Tauseef A. Vuksan, Vladimir Jovanovski, Elena Leiter, Lawrence A. Kendall, Cyril W. C. Jenkins, David J. A. Sievenpiper, John L. J Am Heart Assoc Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis BACKGROUND: Public health policies reflect concerns that certain fruit sources may not have the intended benefits and that vegetables should be preferred to fruit. We assessed the relation of fruit and vegetable sources with cardiovascular outcomes using a systematic review and meta‐analysis of prospective cohort studies. METHODS AND RESULTS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched through June 3, 2019. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality (Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale). Data were pooled (fixed effects), and heterogeneity (Cochrane‐Q and I(2)) and certainty of the evidence (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) were assessed. Eighty‐one cohorts involving 4 031 896 individuals and 125 112 cardiovascular events were included. Total fruit and vegetables, fruit, and vegetables were associated with decreased cardiovascular disease (risk ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.89–0.96]; 0.91 [0.88–0.95]; and 0.94 [0.90–0.97], respectively), coronary heart disease (0.88 [0.83–0.92]; 0.88 [0.84–0.92]; and 0.92 [0.87–0.96], respectively), and stroke (0.82 [0.77–0.88], 0.82 [0.79–0.85]; and 0.88 [0.83–0.93], respectively) incidence. Total fruit and vegetables, fruit, and vegetables were associated with decreased cardiovascular disease (0.89 [0.85–0.93]; 0.88 [0.86–0.91]; and 0.87 [0.85–0.90], respectively), coronary heart disease (0.81 [0.72–0.92]; 0.86 [0.82–0.90]; and 0.86 [0.83–0.89], respectively), and stroke (0.73 [0.65–0.81]; 0.87 [0.84–0.91]; and 0.94 [0.90–0.99], respectively) mortality. There were greater benefits for citrus, 100% fruit juice, and pommes among fruit sources and allium, carrots, cruciferous, and green leafy among vegetable sources. No sources showed an adverse association. The certainty of the evidence was “very low” to “moderate,” with the highest for total fruit and/or vegetables, pommes fruit, and green leafy vegetables. CONCLUSIONS: Fruits and vegetables are associated with cardiovascular benefit, with some sources associated with greater benefit and none showing an adverse association. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03394339. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7792377/ /pubmed/33000670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.017728 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis Zurbau, Andreea Au‐Yeung, Fei Blanco Mejia, Sonia Khan, Tauseef A. Vuksan, Vladimir Jovanovski, Elena Leiter, Lawrence A. Kendall, Cyril W. C. Jenkins, David J. A. Sievenpiper, John L. Relation of Different Fruit and Vegetable Sources With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies |
title | Relation of Different Fruit and Vegetable Sources With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies |
title_full | Relation of Different Fruit and Vegetable Sources With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies |
title_fullStr | Relation of Different Fruit and Vegetable Sources With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Relation of Different Fruit and Vegetable Sources With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies |
title_short | Relation of Different Fruit and Vegetable Sources With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies |
title_sort | relation of different fruit and vegetable sources with incident cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of prospective cohort studies |
topic | Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33000670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.017728 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zurbauandreea relationofdifferentfruitandvegetablesourceswithincidentcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprospectivecohortstudies AT auyeungfei relationofdifferentfruitandvegetablesourceswithincidentcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprospectivecohortstudies AT blancomejiasonia relationofdifferentfruitandvegetablesourceswithincidentcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprospectivecohortstudies AT khantauseefa relationofdifferentfruitandvegetablesourceswithincidentcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprospectivecohortstudies AT vuksanvladimir relationofdifferentfruitandvegetablesourceswithincidentcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprospectivecohortstudies AT jovanovskielena relationofdifferentfruitandvegetablesourceswithincidentcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprospectivecohortstudies AT leiterlawrencea relationofdifferentfruitandvegetablesourceswithincidentcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprospectivecohortstudies AT kendallcyrilwc relationofdifferentfruitandvegetablesourceswithincidentcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprospectivecohortstudies AT jenkinsdavidja relationofdifferentfruitandvegetablesourceswithincidentcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprospectivecohortstudies AT sievenpiperjohnl relationofdifferentfruitandvegetablesourceswithincidentcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprospectivecohortstudies |