Cargando…

Relation of Different Fruit and Vegetable Sources With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies

BACKGROUND: Public health policies reflect concerns that certain fruit sources may not have the intended benefits and that vegetables should be preferred to fruit. We assessed the relation of fruit and vegetable sources with cardiovascular outcomes using a systematic review and meta‐analysis of pros...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zurbau, Andreea, Au‐Yeung, Fei, Blanco Mejia, Sonia, Khan, Tauseef A., Vuksan, Vladimir, Jovanovski, Elena, Leiter, Lawrence A., Kendall, Cyril W. C., Jenkins, David J. A., Sievenpiper, John L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33000670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.017728
_version_ 1783633791881838592
author Zurbau, Andreea
Au‐Yeung, Fei
Blanco Mejia, Sonia
Khan, Tauseef A.
Vuksan, Vladimir
Jovanovski, Elena
Leiter, Lawrence A.
Kendall, Cyril W. C.
Jenkins, David J. A.
Sievenpiper, John L.
author_facet Zurbau, Andreea
Au‐Yeung, Fei
Blanco Mejia, Sonia
Khan, Tauseef A.
Vuksan, Vladimir
Jovanovski, Elena
Leiter, Lawrence A.
Kendall, Cyril W. C.
Jenkins, David J. A.
Sievenpiper, John L.
author_sort Zurbau, Andreea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Public health policies reflect concerns that certain fruit sources may not have the intended benefits and that vegetables should be preferred to fruit. We assessed the relation of fruit and vegetable sources with cardiovascular outcomes using a systematic review and meta‐analysis of prospective cohort studies. METHODS AND RESULTS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched through June 3, 2019. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality (Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale). Data were pooled (fixed effects), and heterogeneity (Cochrane‐Q and I(2)) and certainty of the evidence (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) were assessed. Eighty‐one cohorts involving 4 031 896 individuals and 125 112 cardiovascular events were included. Total fruit and vegetables, fruit, and vegetables were associated with decreased cardiovascular disease (risk ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.89–0.96]; 0.91 [0.88–0.95]; and 0.94 [0.90–0.97], respectively), coronary heart disease (0.88 [0.83–0.92]; 0.88 [0.84–0.92]; and 0.92 [0.87–0.96], respectively), and stroke (0.82 [0.77–0.88], 0.82 [0.79–0.85]; and 0.88 [0.83–0.93], respectively) incidence. Total fruit and vegetables, fruit, and vegetables were associated with decreased cardiovascular disease (0.89 [0.85–0.93]; 0.88 [0.86–0.91]; and 0.87 [0.85–0.90], respectively), coronary heart disease (0.81 [0.72–0.92]; 0.86 [0.82–0.90]; and 0.86 [0.83–0.89], respectively), and stroke (0.73 [0.65–0.81]; 0.87 [0.84–0.91]; and 0.94 [0.90–0.99], respectively) mortality. There were greater benefits for citrus, 100% fruit juice, and pommes among fruit sources and allium, carrots, cruciferous, and green leafy among vegetable sources. No sources showed an adverse association. The certainty of the evidence was “very low” to “moderate,” with the highest for total fruit and/or vegetables, pommes fruit, and green leafy vegetables. CONCLUSIONS: Fruits and vegetables are associated with cardiovascular benefit, with some sources associated with greater benefit and none showing an adverse association. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clini​caltr​ials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03394339.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7792377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77923772021-01-15 Relation of Different Fruit and Vegetable Sources With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies Zurbau, Andreea Au‐Yeung, Fei Blanco Mejia, Sonia Khan, Tauseef A. Vuksan, Vladimir Jovanovski, Elena Leiter, Lawrence A. Kendall, Cyril W. C. Jenkins, David J. A. Sievenpiper, John L. J Am Heart Assoc Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis BACKGROUND: Public health policies reflect concerns that certain fruit sources may not have the intended benefits and that vegetables should be preferred to fruit. We assessed the relation of fruit and vegetable sources with cardiovascular outcomes using a systematic review and meta‐analysis of prospective cohort studies. METHODS AND RESULTS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched through June 3, 2019. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality (Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale). Data were pooled (fixed effects), and heterogeneity (Cochrane‐Q and I(2)) and certainty of the evidence (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) were assessed. Eighty‐one cohorts involving 4 031 896 individuals and 125 112 cardiovascular events were included. Total fruit and vegetables, fruit, and vegetables were associated with decreased cardiovascular disease (risk ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.89–0.96]; 0.91 [0.88–0.95]; and 0.94 [0.90–0.97], respectively), coronary heart disease (0.88 [0.83–0.92]; 0.88 [0.84–0.92]; and 0.92 [0.87–0.96], respectively), and stroke (0.82 [0.77–0.88], 0.82 [0.79–0.85]; and 0.88 [0.83–0.93], respectively) incidence. Total fruit and vegetables, fruit, and vegetables were associated with decreased cardiovascular disease (0.89 [0.85–0.93]; 0.88 [0.86–0.91]; and 0.87 [0.85–0.90], respectively), coronary heart disease (0.81 [0.72–0.92]; 0.86 [0.82–0.90]; and 0.86 [0.83–0.89], respectively), and stroke (0.73 [0.65–0.81]; 0.87 [0.84–0.91]; and 0.94 [0.90–0.99], respectively) mortality. There were greater benefits for citrus, 100% fruit juice, and pommes among fruit sources and allium, carrots, cruciferous, and green leafy among vegetable sources. No sources showed an adverse association. The certainty of the evidence was “very low” to “moderate,” with the highest for total fruit and/or vegetables, pommes fruit, and green leafy vegetables. CONCLUSIONS: Fruits and vegetables are associated with cardiovascular benefit, with some sources associated with greater benefit and none showing an adverse association. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clini​caltr​ials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03394339. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7792377/ /pubmed/33000670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.017728 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
Zurbau, Andreea
Au‐Yeung, Fei
Blanco Mejia, Sonia
Khan, Tauseef A.
Vuksan, Vladimir
Jovanovski, Elena
Leiter, Lawrence A.
Kendall, Cyril W. C.
Jenkins, David J. A.
Sievenpiper, John L.
Relation of Different Fruit and Vegetable Sources With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
title Relation of Different Fruit and Vegetable Sources With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
title_full Relation of Different Fruit and Vegetable Sources With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
title_fullStr Relation of Different Fruit and Vegetable Sources With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
title_full_unstemmed Relation of Different Fruit and Vegetable Sources With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
title_short Relation of Different Fruit and Vegetable Sources With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
title_sort relation of different fruit and vegetable sources with incident cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of prospective cohort studies
topic Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33000670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.017728
work_keys_str_mv AT zurbauandreea relationofdifferentfruitandvegetablesourceswithincidentcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprospectivecohortstudies
AT auyeungfei relationofdifferentfruitandvegetablesourceswithincidentcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprospectivecohortstudies
AT blancomejiasonia relationofdifferentfruitandvegetablesourceswithincidentcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprospectivecohortstudies
AT khantauseefa relationofdifferentfruitandvegetablesourceswithincidentcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprospectivecohortstudies
AT vuksanvladimir relationofdifferentfruitandvegetablesourceswithincidentcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprospectivecohortstudies
AT jovanovskielena relationofdifferentfruitandvegetablesourceswithincidentcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprospectivecohortstudies
AT leiterlawrencea relationofdifferentfruitandvegetablesourceswithincidentcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprospectivecohortstudies
AT kendallcyrilwc relationofdifferentfruitandvegetablesourceswithincidentcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprospectivecohortstudies
AT jenkinsdavidja relationofdifferentfruitandvegetablesourceswithincidentcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprospectivecohortstudies
AT sievenpiperjohnl relationofdifferentfruitandvegetablesourceswithincidentcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprospectivecohortstudies