Cargando…

Accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CECT for primary staging and diagnosis of recurrent gastric cancer: A meta-analysis

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is commonly used for staging and diagnosing recurrent gastric cancer. Recently, (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET)/CT gained popularity as a diagnostic tool owing to advantages including dual functional and anatomical im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Zhicheng, Zheng, Bo, Chen, Wei, Xiong, Hui, Jiang, Caiming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33456531
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9595
_version_ 1783633815619502080
author Zhang, Zhicheng
Zheng, Bo
Chen, Wei
Xiong, Hui
Jiang, Caiming
author_facet Zhang, Zhicheng
Zheng, Bo
Chen, Wei
Xiong, Hui
Jiang, Caiming
author_sort Zhang, Zhicheng
collection PubMed
description Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is commonly used for staging and diagnosing recurrent gastric cancer. Recently, (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET)/CT gained popularity as a diagnostic tool owing to advantages including dual functional and anatomical imaging, which may facilitate early diagnosis. The diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CECT has been assessed in several studies but with variable results. Therefore, the present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CECT for primary TNM staging and the diagnosis of recurrent gastric cancers. A systematic search of the PubMed Central, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane and Embase databases from inception until January 2020 was performed. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Study-2 tool was used to determine the quality of the selected studies. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated. A total of 58 studies comprising 9,997 patients were included. Most studies had a low risk of bias. The sensitivity and specificity for nodal staging of gastric cancer were 49% (95% CI, 37-61%) and 92% (95% CI, 86-96%) for (18)F-FDG PET/CT, respectively, and 67% (95% CI, 57-76%) and 86% (95% CI, 81-89%) for CECT, respectively. For metastasis staging, the sensitivity and specificity were 56% (95% CI, 40-71%) and 97% (95% CI, 87-99%) for (18)F-FDG PET/CT, respectively, and 59% (95% CI, 41-75%) and 96% (95% CI, 83-99%) for CECT, respectively. For diagnosing cancer recurrence, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 81% (95% CI, 72-88%) and 83% (95% CI, 74-89%) for (18)F-FDG PET/CT, respectively, and 59% (95% CI, 41-75%) and 96% (95% CI, 83-99%) for CECT, respectively. Both (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CECT were deemed highly useful for diagnosing recurrent gastric cancer due to their high sensitivities and specificities. However, these techniques cannot be used to exclude or confirm the presence of lymph node metastases or recurrent gastric cancer tumors, but can be used for the confirmation of distal metastasis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7792481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77924812021-01-14 Accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CECT for primary staging and diagnosis of recurrent gastric cancer: A meta-analysis Zhang, Zhicheng Zheng, Bo Chen, Wei Xiong, Hui Jiang, Caiming Exp Ther Med Articles Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is commonly used for staging and diagnosing recurrent gastric cancer. Recently, (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET)/CT gained popularity as a diagnostic tool owing to advantages including dual functional and anatomical imaging, which may facilitate early diagnosis. The diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CECT has been assessed in several studies but with variable results. Therefore, the present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CECT for primary TNM staging and the diagnosis of recurrent gastric cancers. A systematic search of the PubMed Central, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane and Embase databases from inception until January 2020 was performed. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Study-2 tool was used to determine the quality of the selected studies. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated. A total of 58 studies comprising 9,997 patients were included. Most studies had a low risk of bias. The sensitivity and specificity for nodal staging of gastric cancer were 49% (95% CI, 37-61%) and 92% (95% CI, 86-96%) for (18)F-FDG PET/CT, respectively, and 67% (95% CI, 57-76%) and 86% (95% CI, 81-89%) for CECT, respectively. For metastasis staging, the sensitivity and specificity were 56% (95% CI, 40-71%) and 97% (95% CI, 87-99%) for (18)F-FDG PET/CT, respectively, and 59% (95% CI, 41-75%) and 96% (95% CI, 83-99%) for CECT, respectively. For diagnosing cancer recurrence, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 81% (95% CI, 72-88%) and 83% (95% CI, 74-89%) for (18)F-FDG PET/CT, respectively, and 59% (95% CI, 41-75%) and 96% (95% CI, 83-99%) for CECT, respectively. Both (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CECT were deemed highly useful for diagnosing recurrent gastric cancer due to their high sensitivities and specificities. However, these techniques cannot be used to exclude or confirm the presence of lymph node metastases or recurrent gastric cancer tumors, but can be used for the confirmation of distal metastasis. D.A. Spandidos 2021-02 2020-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7792481/ /pubmed/33456531 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9595 Text en Copyright: © Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Zhang, Zhicheng
Zheng, Bo
Chen, Wei
Xiong, Hui
Jiang, Caiming
Accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CECT for primary staging and diagnosis of recurrent gastric cancer: A meta-analysis
title Accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CECT for primary staging and diagnosis of recurrent gastric cancer: A meta-analysis
title_full Accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CECT for primary staging and diagnosis of recurrent gastric cancer: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CECT for primary staging and diagnosis of recurrent gastric cancer: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CECT for primary staging and diagnosis of recurrent gastric cancer: A meta-analysis
title_short Accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CECT for primary staging and diagnosis of recurrent gastric cancer: A meta-analysis
title_sort accuracy of (18)f-fdg pet/ct and cect for primary staging and diagnosis of recurrent gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33456531
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9595
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangzhicheng accuracyof18ffdgpetctandcectforprimarystaginganddiagnosisofrecurrentgastriccancerametaanalysis
AT zhengbo accuracyof18ffdgpetctandcectforprimarystaginganddiagnosisofrecurrentgastriccancerametaanalysis
AT chenwei accuracyof18ffdgpetctandcectforprimarystaginganddiagnosisofrecurrentgastriccancerametaanalysis
AT xionghui accuracyof18ffdgpetctandcectforprimarystaginganddiagnosisofrecurrentgastriccancerametaanalysis
AT jiangcaiming accuracyof18ffdgpetctandcectforprimarystaginganddiagnosisofrecurrentgastriccancerametaanalysis