Cargando…

An assessment of genomic connectedness measures in Nellore cattle

An important criterion to consider in genetic evaluations is the extent of genetic connectedness across management units (MU), especially if they differ in their genetic mean. Reliable comparisons of genetic values across MU depend on the degree of connectedness: the higher the connectedness, the mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amorim, Sabrina T, Yu, Haipeng, Momen, Mehdi, de Albuquerque, Lúcia Galvão, Cravo Pereira, Angélica S, Baldi, Fernando, Morota, Gota
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32877515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa289
_version_ 1783633882071957504
author Amorim, Sabrina T
Yu, Haipeng
Momen, Mehdi
de Albuquerque, Lúcia Galvão
Cravo Pereira, Angélica S
Baldi, Fernando
Morota, Gota
author_facet Amorim, Sabrina T
Yu, Haipeng
Momen, Mehdi
de Albuquerque, Lúcia Galvão
Cravo Pereira, Angélica S
Baldi, Fernando
Morota, Gota
author_sort Amorim, Sabrina T
collection PubMed
description An important criterion to consider in genetic evaluations is the extent of genetic connectedness across management units (MU), especially if they differ in their genetic mean. Reliable comparisons of genetic values across MU depend on the degree of connectedness: the higher the connectedness, the more reliable the comparison. Traditionally, genetic connectedness was calculated through pedigree-based methods; however, in the era of genomic selection, this can be better estimated utilizing new approaches based on genomics. Most procedures consider only additive genetic effects, which may not accurately reflect the underlying gene action of the evaluated trait, and little is known about the impact of non-additive gene action on connectedness measures. The objective of this study was to investigate the extent of genomic connectedness measures, for the first time, in Brazilian field data by applying additive and non-additive relationship matrices using a fatty acid profile data set from seven farms located in the three regions of Brazil, which are part of the three breeding programs. Myristic acid (C14:0) was used due to its importance for human health and reported presence of non-additive gene action. The pedigree included 427,740 animals and 925 of them were genotyped using the Bovine high-density genotyping chip. Six relationship matrices were constructed, parametrically and non-parametrically capturing additive and non-additive genetic effects from both pedigree and genomic data. We assessed genome-based connectedness across MU using the prediction error variance of difference (PEVD) and the coefficient of determination (CD). PEVD values ranged from 0.540 to 1.707, and CD from 0.146 to 0.456. Genomic information consistently enhanced the measures of connectedness compared to the numerator relationship matrix by at least 63%. Combining additive and non-additive genomic kernel relationship matrices or a non-parametric relationship matrix increased the capture of connectedness. Overall, the Gaussian kernel yielded the largest measure of connectedness. Our findings showed that connectedness metrics can be extended to incorporate genomic information and non-additive genetic variation using field data. We propose that different genomic relationship matrices can be designed to capture additive and non-additive genetic effects, increase the measures of connectedness, and to more accurately estimate the true state of connectedness in herds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7792904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77929042021-01-12 An assessment of genomic connectedness measures in Nellore cattle Amorim, Sabrina T Yu, Haipeng Momen, Mehdi de Albuquerque, Lúcia Galvão Cravo Pereira, Angélica S Baldi, Fernando Morota, Gota J Anim Sci Animal Genetics and Genomics An important criterion to consider in genetic evaluations is the extent of genetic connectedness across management units (MU), especially if they differ in their genetic mean. Reliable comparisons of genetic values across MU depend on the degree of connectedness: the higher the connectedness, the more reliable the comparison. Traditionally, genetic connectedness was calculated through pedigree-based methods; however, in the era of genomic selection, this can be better estimated utilizing new approaches based on genomics. Most procedures consider only additive genetic effects, which may not accurately reflect the underlying gene action of the evaluated trait, and little is known about the impact of non-additive gene action on connectedness measures. The objective of this study was to investigate the extent of genomic connectedness measures, for the first time, in Brazilian field data by applying additive and non-additive relationship matrices using a fatty acid profile data set from seven farms located in the three regions of Brazil, which are part of the three breeding programs. Myristic acid (C14:0) was used due to its importance for human health and reported presence of non-additive gene action. The pedigree included 427,740 animals and 925 of them were genotyped using the Bovine high-density genotyping chip. Six relationship matrices were constructed, parametrically and non-parametrically capturing additive and non-additive genetic effects from both pedigree and genomic data. We assessed genome-based connectedness across MU using the prediction error variance of difference (PEVD) and the coefficient of determination (CD). PEVD values ranged from 0.540 to 1.707, and CD from 0.146 to 0.456. Genomic information consistently enhanced the measures of connectedness compared to the numerator relationship matrix by at least 63%. Combining additive and non-additive genomic kernel relationship matrices or a non-parametric relationship matrix increased the capture of connectedness. Overall, the Gaussian kernel yielded the largest measure of connectedness. Our findings showed that connectedness metrics can be extended to incorporate genomic information and non-additive genetic variation using field data. We propose that different genomic relationship matrices can be designed to capture additive and non-additive genetic effects, increase the measures of connectedness, and to more accurately estimate the true state of connectedness in herds. Oxford University Press 2020-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7792904/ /pubmed/32877515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa289 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Animal Genetics and Genomics
Amorim, Sabrina T
Yu, Haipeng
Momen, Mehdi
de Albuquerque, Lúcia Galvão
Cravo Pereira, Angélica S
Baldi, Fernando
Morota, Gota
An assessment of genomic connectedness measures in Nellore cattle
title An assessment of genomic connectedness measures in Nellore cattle
title_full An assessment of genomic connectedness measures in Nellore cattle
title_fullStr An assessment of genomic connectedness measures in Nellore cattle
title_full_unstemmed An assessment of genomic connectedness measures in Nellore cattle
title_short An assessment of genomic connectedness measures in Nellore cattle
title_sort assessment of genomic connectedness measures in nellore cattle
topic Animal Genetics and Genomics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32877515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa289
work_keys_str_mv AT amorimsabrinat anassessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle
AT yuhaipeng anassessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle
AT momenmehdi anassessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle
AT dealbuquerqueluciagalvao anassessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle
AT cravopereiraangelicas anassessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle
AT baldifernando anassessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle
AT morotagota anassessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle
AT amorimsabrinat assessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle
AT yuhaipeng assessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle
AT momenmehdi assessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle
AT dealbuquerqueluciagalvao assessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle
AT cravopereiraangelicas assessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle
AT baldifernando assessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle
AT morotagota assessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle