Cargando…
An assessment of genomic connectedness measures in Nellore cattle
An important criterion to consider in genetic evaluations is the extent of genetic connectedness across management units (MU), especially if they differ in their genetic mean. Reliable comparisons of genetic values across MU depend on the degree of connectedness: the higher the connectedness, the mo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32877515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa289 |
_version_ | 1783633882071957504 |
---|---|
author | Amorim, Sabrina T Yu, Haipeng Momen, Mehdi de Albuquerque, Lúcia Galvão Cravo Pereira, Angélica S Baldi, Fernando Morota, Gota |
author_facet | Amorim, Sabrina T Yu, Haipeng Momen, Mehdi de Albuquerque, Lúcia Galvão Cravo Pereira, Angélica S Baldi, Fernando Morota, Gota |
author_sort | Amorim, Sabrina T |
collection | PubMed |
description | An important criterion to consider in genetic evaluations is the extent of genetic connectedness across management units (MU), especially if they differ in their genetic mean. Reliable comparisons of genetic values across MU depend on the degree of connectedness: the higher the connectedness, the more reliable the comparison. Traditionally, genetic connectedness was calculated through pedigree-based methods; however, in the era of genomic selection, this can be better estimated utilizing new approaches based on genomics. Most procedures consider only additive genetic effects, which may not accurately reflect the underlying gene action of the evaluated trait, and little is known about the impact of non-additive gene action on connectedness measures. The objective of this study was to investigate the extent of genomic connectedness measures, for the first time, in Brazilian field data by applying additive and non-additive relationship matrices using a fatty acid profile data set from seven farms located in the three regions of Brazil, which are part of the three breeding programs. Myristic acid (C14:0) was used due to its importance for human health and reported presence of non-additive gene action. The pedigree included 427,740 animals and 925 of them were genotyped using the Bovine high-density genotyping chip. Six relationship matrices were constructed, parametrically and non-parametrically capturing additive and non-additive genetic effects from both pedigree and genomic data. We assessed genome-based connectedness across MU using the prediction error variance of difference (PEVD) and the coefficient of determination (CD). PEVD values ranged from 0.540 to 1.707, and CD from 0.146 to 0.456. Genomic information consistently enhanced the measures of connectedness compared to the numerator relationship matrix by at least 63%. Combining additive and non-additive genomic kernel relationship matrices or a non-parametric relationship matrix increased the capture of connectedness. Overall, the Gaussian kernel yielded the largest measure of connectedness. Our findings showed that connectedness metrics can be extended to incorporate genomic information and non-additive genetic variation using field data. We propose that different genomic relationship matrices can be designed to capture additive and non-additive genetic effects, increase the measures of connectedness, and to more accurately estimate the true state of connectedness in herds. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7792904 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77929042021-01-12 An assessment of genomic connectedness measures in Nellore cattle Amorim, Sabrina T Yu, Haipeng Momen, Mehdi de Albuquerque, Lúcia Galvão Cravo Pereira, Angélica S Baldi, Fernando Morota, Gota J Anim Sci Animal Genetics and Genomics An important criterion to consider in genetic evaluations is the extent of genetic connectedness across management units (MU), especially if they differ in their genetic mean. Reliable comparisons of genetic values across MU depend on the degree of connectedness: the higher the connectedness, the more reliable the comparison. Traditionally, genetic connectedness was calculated through pedigree-based methods; however, in the era of genomic selection, this can be better estimated utilizing new approaches based on genomics. Most procedures consider only additive genetic effects, which may not accurately reflect the underlying gene action of the evaluated trait, and little is known about the impact of non-additive gene action on connectedness measures. The objective of this study was to investigate the extent of genomic connectedness measures, for the first time, in Brazilian field data by applying additive and non-additive relationship matrices using a fatty acid profile data set from seven farms located in the three regions of Brazil, which are part of the three breeding programs. Myristic acid (C14:0) was used due to its importance for human health and reported presence of non-additive gene action. The pedigree included 427,740 animals and 925 of them were genotyped using the Bovine high-density genotyping chip. Six relationship matrices were constructed, parametrically and non-parametrically capturing additive and non-additive genetic effects from both pedigree and genomic data. We assessed genome-based connectedness across MU using the prediction error variance of difference (PEVD) and the coefficient of determination (CD). PEVD values ranged from 0.540 to 1.707, and CD from 0.146 to 0.456. Genomic information consistently enhanced the measures of connectedness compared to the numerator relationship matrix by at least 63%. Combining additive and non-additive genomic kernel relationship matrices or a non-parametric relationship matrix increased the capture of connectedness. Overall, the Gaussian kernel yielded the largest measure of connectedness. Our findings showed that connectedness metrics can be extended to incorporate genomic information and non-additive genetic variation using field data. We propose that different genomic relationship matrices can be designed to capture additive and non-additive genetic effects, increase the measures of connectedness, and to more accurately estimate the true state of connectedness in herds. Oxford University Press 2020-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7792904/ /pubmed/32877515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa289 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Animal Genetics and Genomics Amorim, Sabrina T Yu, Haipeng Momen, Mehdi de Albuquerque, Lúcia Galvão Cravo Pereira, Angélica S Baldi, Fernando Morota, Gota An assessment of genomic connectedness measures in Nellore cattle |
title | An assessment of genomic connectedness measures in Nellore
cattle |
title_full | An assessment of genomic connectedness measures in Nellore
cattle |
title_fullStr | An assessment of genomic connectedness measures in Nellore
cattle |
title_full_unstemmed | An assessment of genomic connectedness measures in Nellore
cattle |
title_short | An assessment of genomic connectedness measures in Nellore
cattle |
title_sort | assessment of genomic connectedness measures in nellore
cattle |
topic | Animal Genetics and Genomics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32877515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa289 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amorimsabrinat anassessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle AT yuhaipeng anassessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle AT momenmehdi anassessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle AT dealbuquerqueluciagalvao anassessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle AT cravopereiraangelicas anassessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle AT baldifernando anassessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle AT morotagota anassessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle AT amorimsabrinat assessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle AT yuhaipeng assessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle AT momenmehdi assessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle AT dealbuquerqueluciagalvao assessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle AT cravopereiraangelicas assessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle AT baldifernando assessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle AT morotagota assessmentofgenomicconnectednessmeasuresinnellorecattle |