Cargando…
Immunocompetent Mouse Models in the Search for Effective Immunotherapy in Glioblastoma
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Glioblastoma (GBM) remains the most aggressive brain tumor. Treatment typically includes surgery and radio/chemotherapy, but in spite of intensive treatment, virtually all tumors recur within the time-frame of months with insufficient and unsuccessful second line options. This clinic...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7793150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33374542 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13010019 |
Sumario: | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Glioblastoma (GBM) remains the most aggressive brain tumor. Treatment typically includes surgery and radio/chemotherapy, but in spite of intensive treatment, virtually all tumors recur within the time-frame of months with insufficient and unsuccessful second line options. This clinical reality is in contrast to preclinical animal experiments, which often show successful outcomes of novel immunotherapeutic approaches. This discrepancy is largely explained by the small number of animal models and their limited capacity to mimic the complexity of the human disease. Moreover, new treatment options are typically administered as single treatments in animal models, whereas patients receive them in combination with standard-of-care. In this review, we provide an overview of the existing mouse models for GBM research and how each of them mimic (parts of) the human disease spectrum. As such we provide an overview of the advantages and limitations of the currently available options for in vivo drug testing for GBM. ABSTRACT: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive intrinsic brain tumor in adults. Despite maximal therapy consisting of surgery and radio/chemotherapy, GBM remains largely incurable with a median survival of less than 15 months. GBM has a strong immunosuppressive nature with a multitude of tumor and microenvironment (TME) derived factors that prohibit an effective immune response. To date, all clinical trials failed to provide lasting clinical efficacy, despite the relatively high success rates of preclinical studies to show effectivity of immunotherapy. Various factors may explain this discrepancy, including the inability of a single mouse model to fully recapitulate the complexity and heterogeneity of GBM. It is therefore critical to understand the features and limitations of each model, which should probably be combined to grab the full spectrum of the disease. In this review, we summarize the available knowledge concerning immune composition, stem cell characteristics and response to standard-of-care and immunotherapeutics for the most commonly available immunocompetent mouse models of GBM. |
---|