Cargando…

Absence of shock therapy related to improper sensing of noise on the defibrillation test during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter–defibrillator implantation: a case report

BACKGROUND : Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (S-ICD) represents an efficient alternative to transvenous ICD in patients who do not require pacing. The intraoperative defibrillation test (DFT) is recommended during S-ICD implantation to confirm appropriate sensing and successful 6...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tamura, Shota, Yoshiyama, Tomotaka, Doi, Atsushi, Yoshiyama, Minoru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7793213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytaa469
_version_ 1783633940089667584
author Tamura, Shota
Yoshiyama, Tomotaka
Doi, Atsushi
Yoshiyama, Minoru
author_facet Tamura, Shota
Yoshiyama, Tomotaka
Doi, Atsushi
Yoshiyama, Minoru
author_sort Tamura, Shota
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND : Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (S-ICD) represents an efficient alternative to transvenous ICD in patients who do not require pacing. The intraoperative defibrillation test (DFT) is recommended during S-ICD implantation to confirm appropriate sensing and successful 65-J termination of induced ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, few cases of oversensing of noise inhibiting therapies have been reported. CASE SUMMARY : We report the case of a 50-year-old man who underwent S-ICD implantation for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Immediately after S-ICD implantation, VF was induced using a 50-Hz burst; however, shock was not delivered owing to sustained noise on the electrogram in the primary vector. Therefore, an external rescue shock was needed at 150 J. We changed the sensing vector from primary to secondary and performed a second DFT. The S-ICD could deliver an appropriate shock and was able to successfully terminate VF without noise markers in the secondary vector. During the second DFT, one back-up pacing was delivered after the shock; the sensing vector then automatically switched from the secondary to the alternate vector. However, noise was observed in the alternate vector despite sinus rhythm restoration. DISCUSSION : The present case demonstrated that noise was recorded in two different vectors during DFT, possibly supporting the hypothesis that the muscle spasm of the diaphragm induced by the 50-Hz burst causes oversensing of noise by the S-ICD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7793213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77932132021-01-13 Absence of shock therapy related to improper sensing of noise on the defibrillation test during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter–defibrillator implantation: a case report Tamura, Shota Yoshiyama, Tomotaka Doi, Atsushi Yoshiyama, Minoru Eur Heart J Case Rep Case Reports BACKGROUND : Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (S-ICD) represents an efficient alternative to transvenous ICD in patients who do not require pacing. The intraoperative defibrillation test (DFT) is recommended during S-ICD implantation to confirm appropriate sensing and successful 65-J termination of induced ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, few cases of oversensing of noise inhibiting therapies have been reported. CASE SUMMARY : We report the case of a 50-year-old man who underwent S-ICD implantation for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Immediately after S-ICD implantation, VF was induced using a 50-Hz burst; however, shock was not delivered owing to sustained noise on the electrogram in the primary vector. Therefore, an external rescue shock was needed at 150 J. We changed the sensing vector from primary to secondary and performed a second DFT. The S-ICD could deliver an appropriate shock and was able to successfully terminate VF without noise markers in the secondary vector. During the second DFT, one back-up pacing was delivered after the shock; the sensing vector then automatically switched from the secondary to the alternate vector. However, noise was observed in the alternate vector despite sinus rhythm restoration. DISCUSSION : The present case demonstrated that noise was recorded in two different vectors during DFT, possibly supporting the hypothesis that the muscle spasm of the diaphragm induced by the 50-Hz burst causes oversensing of noise by the S-ICD. Oxford University Press 2020-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7793213/ /pubmed/33447710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytaa469 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Case Reports
Tamura, Shota
Yoshiyama, Tomotaka
Doi, Atsushi
Yoshiyama, Minoru
Absence of shock therapy related to improper sensing of noise on the defibrillation test during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter–defibrillator implantation: a case report
title Absence of shock therapy related to improper sensing of noise on the defibrillation test during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter–defibrillator implantation: a case report
title_full Absence of shock therapy related to improper sensing of noise on the defibrillation test during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter–defibrillator implantation: a case report
title_fullStr Absence of shock therapy related to improper sensing of noise on the defibrillation test during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter–defibrillator implantation: a case report
title_full_unstemmed Absence of shock therapy related to improper sensing of noise on the defibrillation test during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter–defibrillator implantation: a case report
title_short Absence of shock therapy related to improper sensing of noise on the defibrillation test during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter–defibrillator implantation: a case report
title_sort absence of shock therapy related to improper sensing of noise on the defibrillation test during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter–defibrillator implantation: a case report
topic Case Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7793213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytaa469
work_keys_str_mv AT tamurashota absenceofshocktherapyrelatedtoimpropersensingofnoiseonthedefibrillationtestduringsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorimplantationacasereport
AT yoshiyamatomotaka absenceofshocktherapyrelatedtoimpropersensingofnoiseonthedefibrillationtestduringsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorimplantationacasereport
AT doiatsushi absenceofshocktherapyrelatedtoimpropersensingofnoiseonthedefibrillationtestduringsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorimplantationacasereport
AT yoshiyamaminoru absenceofshocktherapyrelatedtoimpropersensingofnoiseonthedefibrillationtestduringsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorimplantationacasereport