Cargando…
The effect of COVID-19 on emergency department imaging: what can we learn?
PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department (ED) imaging. METHODS: This retrospective study included all ED visits at a four-hospital academic health system in two matched 5-week periods. Demographic information, COVID-19 status, and disposition were reviewed....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7793387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33420529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10140-020-01889-9 |
_version_ | 1783633979002322944 |
---|---|
author | Sharperson, Camara Hanna, Tarek N. Herr, Keith D. Zygmont, Matthew E. Gerard, Roger L. Johnson, Jamlik-Omari |
author_facet | Sharperson, Camara Hanna, Tarek N. Herr, Keith D. Zygmont, Matthew E. Gerard, Roger L. Johnson, Jamlik-Omari |
author_sort | Sharperson, Camara |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department (ED) imaging. METHODS: This retrospective study included all ED visits at a four-hospital academic health system in two matched 5-week periods. Demographic information, COVID-19 status, and disposition were reviewed. Type of imaging, acquisition time, and radiology reports were analyzed. Significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A 43.2% decrease in ED visits and 12% reduction in overall ED imaging occurred during the pandemic period. Mean age was unchanged, but a shift in gender and racial characteristics was observed (p < 0.001). In the pandemic period, COVID-19 ED patients were older (61.8 ± 16.9 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to be Black (64.2%; p < 0.001) than non-COVID-19 patients. Imaging per ED encounter increased to 2.4 ± 2.8 exams from 1.7 ± 1.1 (p < 0.001). Radiography increased (57.2% vs. 52.4%) as a fraction of total ED imaging, while computed tomography (23.4% vs. 27.2%) and ultrasound (8.5% vs. 9.6%) decreased (pre-pandemic vs. pandemic). COVID-19 ED patients underwent CT and US at a lower rate (11.5% and 5.4%) than non-COVID-19 patients (25.4% and 9.1%). The proportion of imaging study reports concluding “no disease” or “no acute disease” decreased from 56.7 to 40.6% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a significant reduction in ED visits, a shift in patient demographics, and a significant decrease in imaging volume. Additional impact included a significant increase in the proportion of positive imaging studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7793387 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77933872021-01-11 The effect of COVID-19 on emergency department imaging: what can we learn? Sharperson, Camara Hanna, Tarek N. Herr, Keith D. Zygmont, Matthew E. Gerard, Roger L. Johnson, Jamlik-Omari Emerg Radiol Original Article PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department (ED) imaging. METHODS: This retrospective study included all ED visits at a four-hospital academic health system in two matched 5-week periods. Demographic information, COVID-19 status, and disposition were reviewed. Type of imaging, acquisition time, and radiology reports were analyzed. Significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A 43.2% decrease in ED visits and 12% reduction in overall ED imaging occurred during the pandemic period. Mean age was unchanged, but a shift in gender and racial characteristics was observed (p < 0.001). In the pandemic period, COVID-19 ED patients were older (61.8 ± 16.9 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to be Black (64.2%; p < 0.001) than non-COVID-19 patients. Imaging per ED encounter increased to 2.4 ± 2.8 exams from 1.7 ± 1.1 (p < 0.001). Radiography increased (57.2% vs. 52.4%) as a fraction of total ED imaging, while computed tomography (23.4% vs. 27.2%) and ultrasound (8.5% vs. 9.6%) decreased (pre-pandemic vs. pandemic). COVID-19 ED patients underwent CT and US at a lower rate (11.5% and 5.4%) than non-COVID-19 patients (25.4% and 9.1%). The proportion of imaging study reports concluding “no disease” or “no acute disease” decreased from 56.7 to 40.6% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a significant reduction in ED visits, a shift in patient demographics, and a significant decrease in imaging volume. Additional impact included a significant increase in the proportion of positive imaging studies. Springer International Publishing 2021-01-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7793387/ /pubmed/33420529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10140-020-01889-9 Text en © American Society of Emergency Radiology 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sharperson, Camara Hanna, Tarek N. Herr, Keith D. Zygmont, Matthew E. Gerard, Roger L. Johnson, Jamlik-Omari The effect of COVID-19 on emergency department imaging: what can we learn? |
title | The effect of COVID-19 on emergency department imaging: what can we learn? |
title_full | The effect of COVID-19 on emergency department imaging: what can we learn? |
title_fullStr | The effect of COVID-19 on emergency department imaging: what can we learn? |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of COVID-19 on emergency department imaging: what can we learn? |
title_short | The effect of COVID-19 on emergency department imaging: what can we learn? |
title_sort | effect of covid-19 on emergency department imaging: what can we learn? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7793387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33420529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10140-020-01889-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharpersoncamara theeffectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn AT hannatarekn theeffectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn AT herrkeithd theeffectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn AT zygmontmatthewe theeffectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn AT gerardrogerl theeffectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn AT johnsonjamlikomari theeffectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn AT sharpersoncamara effectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn AT hannatarekn effectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn AT herrkeithd effectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn AT zygmontmatthewe effectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn AT gerardrogerl effectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn AT johnsonjamlikomari effectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn |