Cargando…

The effect of COVID-19 on emergency department imaging: what can we learn?

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department (ED) imaging. METHODS: This retrospective study included all ED visits at a four-hospital academic health system in two matched 5-week periods. Demographic information, COVID-19 status, and disposition were reviewed....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharperson, Camara, Hanna, Tarek N., Herr, Keith D., Zygmont, Matthew E., Gerard, Roger L., Johnson, Jamlik-Omari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7793387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33420529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10140-020-01889-9
_version_ 1783633979002322944
author Sharperson, Camara
Hanna, Tarek N.
Herr, Keith D.
Zygmont, Matthew E.
Gerard, Roger L.
Johnson, Jamlik-Omari
author_facet Sharperson, Camara
Hanna, Tarek N.
Herr, Keith D.
Zygmont, Matthew E.
Gerard, Roger L.
Johnson, Jamlik-Omari
author_sort Sharperson, Camara
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department (ED) imaging. METHODS: This retrospective study included all ED visits at a four-hospital academic health system in two matched 5-week periods. Demographic information, COVID-19 status, and disposition were reviewed. Type of imaging, acquisition time, and radiology reports were analyzed. Significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A 43.2% decrease in ED visits and 12% reduction in overall ED imaging occurred during the pandemic period. Mean age was unchanged, but a shift in gender and racial characteristics was observed (p < 0.001). In the pandemic period, COVID-19 ED patients were older (61.8 ± 16.9 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to be Black (64.2%; p < 0.001) than non-COVID-19 patients. Imaging per ED encounter increased to 2.4 ± 2.8 exams from 1.7 ± 1.1 (p < 0.001). Radiography increased (57.2% vs. 52.4%) as a fraction of total ED imaging, while computed tomography (23.4% vs. 27.2%) and ultrasound (8.5% vs. 9.6%) decreased (pre-pandemic vs. pandemic). COVID-19 ED patients underwent CT and US at a lower rate (11.5% and 5.4%) than non-COVID-19 patients (25.4% and 9.1%). The proportion of imaging study reports concluding “no disease” or “no acute disease” decreased from 56.7 to 40.6% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a significant reduction in ED visits, a shift in patient demographics, and a significant decrease in imaging volume. Additional impact included a significant increase in the proportion of positive imaging studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7793387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77933872021-01-11 The effect of COVID-19 on emergency department imaging: what can we learn? Sharperson, Camara Hanna, Tarek N. Herr, Keith D. Zygmont, Matthew E. Gerard, Roger L. Johnson, Jamlik-Omari Emerg Radiol Original Article PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department (ED) imaging. METHODS: This retrospective study included all ED visits at a four-hospital academic health system in two matched 5-week periods. Demographic information, COVID-19 status, and disposition were reviewed. Type of imaging, acquisition time, and radiology reports were analyzed. Significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A 43.2% decrease in ED visits and 12% reduction in overall ED imaging occurred during the pandemic period. Mean age was unchanged, but a shift in gender and racial characteristics was observed (p < 0.001). In the pandemic period, COVID-19 ED patients were older (61.8 ± 16.9 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to be Black (64.2%; p < 0.001) than non-COVID-19 patients. Imaging per ED encounter increased to 2.4 ± 2.8 exams from 1.7 ± 1.1 (p < 0.001). Radiography increased (57.2% vs. 52.4%) as a fraction of total ED imaging, while computed tomography (23.4% vs. 27.2%) and ultrasound (8.5% vs. 9.6%) decreased (pre-pandemic vs. pandemic). COVID-19 ED patients underwent CT and US at a lower rate (11.5% and 5.4%) than non-COVID-19 patients (25.4% and 9.1%). The proportion of imaging study reports concluding “no disease” or “no acute disease” decreased from 56.7 to 40.6% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a significant reduction in ED visits, a shift in patient demographics, and a significant decrease in imaging volume. Additional impact included a significant increase in the proportion of positive imaging studies. Springer International Publishing 2021-01-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7793387/ /pubmed/33420529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10140-020-01889-9 Text en © American Society of Emergency Radiology 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sharperson, Camara
Hanna, Tarek N.
Herr, Keith D.
Zygmont, Matthew E.
Gerard, Roger L.
Johnson, Jamlik-Omari
The effect of COVID-19 on emergency department imaging: what can we learn?
title The effect of COVID-19 on emergency department imaging: what can we learn?
title_full The effect of COVID-19 on emergency department imaging: what can we learn?
title_fullStr The effect of COVID-19 on emergency department imaging: what can we learn?
title_full_unstemmed The effect of COVID-19 on emergency department imaging: what can we learn?
title_short The effect of COVID-19 on emergency department imaging: what can we learn?
title_sort effect of covid-19 on emergency department imaging: what can we learn?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7793387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33420529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10140-020-01889-9
work_keys_str_mv AT sharpersoncamara theeffectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn
AT hannatarekn theeffectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn
AT herrkeithd theeffectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn
AT zygmontmatthewe theeffectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn
AT gerardrogerl theeffectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn
AT johnsonjamlikomari theeffectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn
AT sharpersoncamara effectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn
AT hannatarekn effectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn
AT herrkeithd effectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn
AT zygmontmatthewe effectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn
AT gerardrogerl effectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn
AT johnsonjamlikomari effectofcovid19onemergencydepartmentimagingwhatcanwelearn