Cargando…

Fluctuating NMDA Receptor Subunit Levels in Perirhinal Cortex Relate to Their Dynamic Roles in Object Memory Destabilization and Reconsolidation

Reminder cues can destabilize consolidated memories, rendering them modifiable before they return to a stable state through the process of reconsolidation. Older and stronger memories resist this process and require the presentation of reminders along with salient novel information in order to desta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wideman, Cassidy E., Nguyen, James, Jeffries, Sean D., Winters, Boyer D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7793502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33374645
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22010067
_version_ 1783634006143664128
author Wideman, Cassidy E.
Nguyen, James
Jeffries, Sean D.
Winters, Boyer D.
author_facet Wideman, Cassidy E.
Nguyen, James
Jeffries, Sean D.
Winters, Boyer D.
author_sort Wideman, Cassidy E.
collection PubMed
description Reminder cues can destabilize consolidated memories, rendering them modifiable before they return to a stable state through the process of reconsolidation. Older and stronger memories resist this process and require the presentation of reminders along with salient novel information in order to destabilize. Previously, we demonstrated in rats that novelty-induced object memory destabilization requires acetylcholine (ACh) activity at M(1) muscarinic receptors. Other research predominantly has focused on glutamate, which modulates fear memory destabilization and reconsolidation through GluN2B- and GluN2A-containing NMDARs, respectively. In the current study, we demonstrate the same dissociable roles of GluN2B- and N2A-containing NMDARs in perirhinal cortex (PRh) for object memory destabilization and reconsolidation when boundary conditions are absent. However, neither GluN2 receptor subtype was required for novelty-induced destabilization of remote, resistant memories. Furthermore, GluN2B and GluN2A subunit proteins were upregulated selectively in PRh 24 h after learning, but returned to baseline by 48 h, suggesting that NMDARs, unlike muscarinic receptors, have only a temporary role in object memory destabilization. Indeed, activation of M(1) receptors in PRh at the time of reactivation effectively destabilized remote memories despite inhibition of GluN2B-containing NMDARs. These findings suggest that cholinergic activity at M(1) receptors overrides boundary conditions to destabilize resistant memories when other established mechanisms are insufficient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7793502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77935022021-01-09 Fluctuating NMDA Receptor Subunit Levels in Perirhinal Cortex Relate to Their Dynamic Roles in Object Memory Destabilization and Reconsolidation Wideman, Cassidy E. Nguyen, James Jeffries, Sean D. Winters, Boyer D. Int J Mol Sci Article Reminder cues can destabilize consolidated memories, rendering them modifiable before they return to a stable state through the process of reconsolidation. Older and stronger memories resist this process and require the presentation of reminders along with salient novel information in order to destabilize. Previously, we demonstrated in rats that novelty-induced object memory destabilization requires acetylcholine (ACh) activity at M(1) muscarinic receptors. Other research predominantly has focused on glutamate, which modulates fear memory destabilization and reconsolidation through GluN2B- and GluN2A-containing NMDARs, respectively. In the current study, we demonstrate the same dissociable roles of GluN2B- and N2A-containing NMDARs in perirhinal cortex (PRh) for object memory destabilization and reconsolidation when boundary conditions are absent. However, neither GluN2 receptor subtype was required for novelty-induced destabilization of remote, resistant memories. Furthermore, GluN2B and GluN2A subunit proteins were upregulated selectively in PRh 24 h after learning, but returned to baseline by 48 h, suggesting that NMDARs, unlike muscarinic receptors, have only a temporary role in object memory destabilization. Indeed, activation of M(1) receptors in PRh at the time of reactivation effectively destabilized remote memories despite inhibition of GluN2B-containing NMDARs. These findings suggest that cholinergic activity at M(1) receptors overrides boundary conditions to destabilize resistant memories when other established mechanisms are insufficient. MDPI 2020-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7793502/ /pubmed/33374645 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22010067 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wideman, Cassidy E.
Nguyen, James
Jeffries, Sean D.
Winters, Boyer D.
Fluctuating NMDA Receptor Subunit Levels in Perirhinal Cortex Relate to Their Dynamic Roles in Object Memory Destabilization and Reconsolidation
title Fluctuating NMDA Receptor Subunit Levels in Perirhinal Cortex Relate to Their Dynamic Roles in Object Memory Destabilization and Reconsolidation
title_full Fluctuating NMDA Receptor Subunit Levels in Perirhinal Cortex Relate to Their Dynamic Roles in Object Memory Destabilization and Reconsolidation
title_fullStr Fluctuating NMDA Receptor Subunit Levels in Perirhinal Cortex Relate to Their Dynamic Roles in Object Memory Destabilization and Reconsolidation
title_full_unstemmed Fluctuating NMDA Receptor Subunit Levels in Perirhinal Cortex Relate to Their Dynamic Roles in Object Memory Destabilization and Reconsolidation
title_short Fluctuating NMDA Receptor Subunit Levels in Perirhinal Cortex Relate to Their Dynamic Roles in Object Memory Destabilization and Reconsolidation
title_sort fluctuating nmda receptor subunit levels in perirhinal cortex relate to their dynamic roles in object memory destabilization and reconsolidation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7793502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33374645
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22010067
work_keys_str_mv AT widemancassidye fluctuatingnmdareceptorsubunitlevelsinperirhinalcortexrelatetotheirdynamicrolesinobjectmemorydestabilizationandreconsolidation
AT nguyenjames fluctuatingnmdareceptorsubunitlevelsinperirhinalcortexrelatetotheirdynamicrolesinobjectmemorydestabilizationandreconsolidation
AT jeffriesseand fluctuatingnmdareceptorsubunitlevelsinperirhinalcortexrelatetotheirdynamicrolesinobjectmemorydestabilizationandreconsolidation
AT wintersboyerd fluctuatingnmdareceptorsubunitlevelsinperirhinalcortexrelatetotheirdynamicrolesinobjectmemorydestabilizationandreconsolidation