Cargando…
Mild Cognitive Impairment: the Manchester consensus
Given considerable variation in diagnostic and therapeutic practice, there is a need for national guidance on the use of neuroimaging, fluid biomarkers, cognitive testing, follow-up and diagnostic terminology in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). MCI is a heterogenous clinical syndrome reflecting a ch...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7793599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33197937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa228 |
_version_ | 1783634024131985408 |
---|---|
author | Dunne, Ross A Aarsland, Dag O’Brien, John T Ballard, Clive Banerjee, Sube Fox, Nick C Isaacs, Jeremy D Underwood, Benjamin R Perry, Richard J Chan, Dennis Dening, Tom Thomas, Alan J Schryer, Jeffrey Jones, Anne-Marie Evans, Alison R Alessi, Charles Coulthard, Elizabeth J Pickett, James Elton, Peter Jones, Roy W Mitchell, Susan Hooper, Nigel Kalafatis, Chris Rasmussen, Jill G C Martin, Helen Schott, Jonathan M Burns, Alistair |
author_facet | Dunne, Ross A Aarsland, Dag O’Brien, John T Ballard, Clive Banerjee, Sube Fox, Nick C Isaacs, Jeremy D Underwood, Benjamin R Perry, Richard J Chan, Dennis Dening, Tom Thomas, Alan J Schryer, Jeffrey Jones, Anne-Marie Evans, Alison R Alessi, Charles Coulthard, Elizabeth J Pickett, James Elton, Peter Jones, Roy W Mitchell, Susan Hooper, Nigel Kalafatis, Chris Rasmussen, Jill G C Martin, Helen Schott, Jonathan M Burns, Alistair |
author_sort | Dunne, Ross A |
collection | PubMed |
description | Given considerable variation in diagnostic and therapeutic practice, there is a need for national guidance on the use of neuroimaging, fluid biomarkers, cognitive testing, follow-up and diagnostic terminology in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). MCI is a heterogenous clinical syndrome reflecting a change in cognitive function and deficits on neuropsychological testing but relatively intact activities of daily living. MCI is a risk state for further cognitive and functional decline with 5–15% of people developing dementia per year. However, ~50% remain stable at 5 years and in a minority, symptoms resolve over time. There is considerable debate about whether MCI is a useful clinical diagnosis, or whether the use of the term prevents proper inquiry (by history, examination and investigations) into underlying causes of cognitive symptoms, which can include prodromal neurodegenerative disease, other physical or psychiatric illness, or combinations thereof. Cognitive testing, neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers can improve the sensitivity and specificity of aetiological diagnosis, with growing evidence that these may also help guide prognosis. Diagnostic criteria allow for a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease to be made where MCI is accompanied by appropriate biomarker changes, but in practice, such biomarkers are not available in routine clinical practice in the UK. This would change if disease-modifying therapies became available and required a definitive diagnosis but would present major challenges to the National Health Service and similar health systems. Significantly increased investment would be required in training, infrastructure and provision of fluid biomarkers and neuroimaging. Statistical techniques combining markers may provide greater sensitivity and specificity than any single disease marker but their practical usefulness will depend on large-scale studies to ensure ecological validity and that multiple measures, e.g. both cognitive tests and biomarkers, are widely available for clinical use. To perform such large studies, we must increase research participation amongst those with MCI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7793599 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77935992021-01-13 Mild Cognitive Impairment: the Manchester consensus Dunne, Ross A Aarsland, Dag O’Brien, John T Ballard, Clive Banerjee, Sube Fox, Nick C Isaacs, Jeremy D Underwood, Benjamin R Perry, Richard J Chan, Dennis Dening, Tom Thomas, Alan J Schryer, Jeffrey Jones, Anne-Marie Evans, Alison R Alessi, Charles Coulthard, Elizabeth J Pickett, James Elton, Peter Jones, Roy W Mitchell, Susan Hooper, Nigel Kalafatis, Chris Rasmussen, Jill G C Martin, Helen Schott, Jonathan M Burns, Alistair Age Ageing Guidelines Given considerable variation in diagnostic and therapeutic practice, there is a need for national guidance on the use of neuroimaging, fluid biomarkers, cognitive testing, follow-up and diagnostic terminology in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). MCI is a heterogenous clinical syndrome reflecting a change in cognitive function and deficits on neuropsychological testing but relatively intact activities of daily living. MCI is a risk state for further cognitive and functional decline with 5–15% of people developing dementia per year. However, ~50% remain stable at 5 years and in a minority, symptoms resolve over time. There is considerable debate about whether MCI is a useful clinical diagnosis, or whether the use of the term prevents proper inquiry (by history, examination and investigations) into underlying causes of cognitive symptoms, which can include prodromal neurodegenerative disease, other physical or psychiatric illness, or combinations thereof. Cognitive testing, neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers can improve the sensitivity and specificity of aetiological diagnosis, with growing evidence that these may also help guide prognosis. Diagnostic criteria allow for a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease to be made where MCI is accompanied by appropriate biomarker changes, but in practice, such biomarkers are not available in routine clinical practice in the UK. This would change if disease-modifying therapies became available and required a definitive diagnosis but would present major challenges to the National Health Service and similar health systems. Significantly increased investment would be required in training, infrastructure and provision of fluid biomarkers and neuroimaging. Statistical techniques combining markers may provide greater sensitivity and specificity than any single disease marker but their practical usefulness will depend on large-scale studies to ensure ecological validity and that multiple measures, e.g. both cognitive tests and biomarkers, are widely available for clinical use. To perform such large studies, we must increase research participation amongst those with MCI. Oxford University Press 2020-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7793599/ /pubmed/33197937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa228 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Guidelines Dunne, Ross A Aarsland, Dag O’Brien, John T Ballard, Clive Banerjee, Sube Fox, Nick C Isaacs, Jeremy D Underwood, Benjamin R Perry, Richard J Chan, Dennis Dening, Tom Thomas, Alan J Schryer, Jeffrey Jones, Anne-Marie Evans, Alison R Alessi, Charles Coulthard, Elizabeth J Pickett, James Elton, Peter Jones, Roy W Mitchell, Susan Hooper, Nigel Kalafatis, Chris Rasmussen, Jill G C Martin, Helen Schott, Jonathan M Burns, Alistair Mild Cognitive Impairment: the Manchester consensus |
title | Mild Cognitive Impairment: the Manchester consensus |
title_full | Mild Cognitive Impairment: the Manchester consensus |
title_fullStr | Mild Cognitive Impairment: the Manchester consensus |
title_full_unstemmed | Mild Cognitive Impairment: the Manchester consensus |
title_short | Mild Cognitive Impairment: the Manchester consensus |
title_sort | mild cognitive impairment: the manchester consensus |
topic | Guidelines |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7793599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33197937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa228 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dunnerossa mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT aarslanddag mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT obrienjohnt mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT ballardclive mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT banerjeesube mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT foxnickc mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT isaacsjeremyd mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT underwoodbenjaminr mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT perryrichardj mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT chandennis mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT deningtom mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT thomasalanj mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT schryerjeffrey mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT jonesannemarie mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT evansalisonr mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT alessicharles mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT coulthardelizabethj mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT pickettjames mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT eltonpeter mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT jonesroyw mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT mitchellsusan mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT hoopernigel mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT kalafatischris mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT rasmussenjillgc mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT martinhelen mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT schottjonathanm mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus AT burnsalistair mildcognitiveimpairmentthemanchesterconsensus |