Cargando…

Current Devices in TMVI and Their Limitations: Focus on Tendyne

Mitral valve regurgitation (MR) has a high incidence in the western world, and mortality is high for untreated severe MR. Catheter based repair was introduced with MitraClip in 2003, and some additional devices later came into the market. To expand the transcatheter treatment options for mitral valv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Dahle, Gry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7793646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33425997
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.592909
_version_ 1783634031648178176
author Dahle, Gry
author_facet Dahle, Gry
author_sort Dahle, Gry
collection PubMed
description Mitral valve regurgitation (MR) has a high incidence in the western world, and mortality is high for untreated severe MR. Catheter based repair was introduced with MitraClip in 2003, and some additional devices later came into the market. To expand the transcatheter treatment options for mitral valve disease, the first transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI) was performed by Søndergaard et al. 2012, only 10 years after the first transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), however, the development has been much slower for the TMVI than for TAVI. From 2012, studies were started for several devices to prove feasibility and safety. However, there were big challenges in valve design; delivery systems and anchoring in addition to anatomical issues (avoid LVOT obstruction and paravalvular leak, big size of annulus). The main valves in studies were CardiaQ (later bought by Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, United States), Tiara (Neovasc Inc., Richmond, Canada), Twelve (later Intrepid, Medtronic, MN, United States) and Tendyne™ (Abbott, MN, United States). I will focus on the Tendyne™ valve that is the only CE approved transcatheter mitral valve implant. It is available in a large number of sizes and is repositionable and retrievable. The results for the 100 first patients included in the early feasibility study (EFS) at 1 and 2 years are promising. Initially feasible for MR, but further investigations show promising results also for implant in mitral annular calcification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7793646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77936462021-01-09 Current Devices in TMVI and Their Limitations: Focus on Tendyne Dahle, Gry Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Mitral valve regurgitation (MR) has a high incidence in the western world, and mortality is high for untreated severe MR. Catheter based repair was introduced with MitraClip in 2003, and some additional devices later came into the market. To expand the transcatheter treatment options for mitral valve disease, the first transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI) was performed by Søndergaard et al. 2012, only 10 years after the first transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), however, the development has been much slower for the TMVI than for TAVI. From 2012, studies were started for several devices to prove feasibility and safety. However, there were big challenges in valve design; delivery systems and anchoring in addition to anatomical issues (avoid LVOT obstruction and paravalvular leak, big size of annulus). The main valves in studies were CardiaQ (later bought by Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, United States), Tiara (Neovasc Inc., Richmond, Canada), Twelve (later Intrepid, Medtronic, MN, United States) and Tendyne™ (Abbott, MN, United States). I will focus on the Tendyne™ valve that is the only CE approved transcatheter mitral valve implant. It is available in a large number of sizes and is repositionable and retrievable. The results for the 100 first patients included in the early feasibility study (EFS) at 1 and 2 years are promising. Initially feasible for MR, but further investigations show promising results also for implant in mitral annular calcification. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7793646/ /pubmed/33425997 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.592909 Text en Copyright © 2020 Dahle. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Dahle, Gry
Current Devices in TMVI and Their Limitations: Focus on Tendyne
title Current Devices in TMVI and Their Limitations: Focus on Tendyne
title_full Current Devices in TMVI and Their Limitations: Focus on Tendyne
title_fullStr Current Devices in TMVI and Their Limitations: Focus on Tendyne
title_full_unstemmed Current Devices in TMVI and Their Limitations: Focus on Tendyne
title_short Current Devices in TMVI and Their Limitations: Focus on Tendyne
title_sort current devices in tmvi and their limitations: focus on tendyne
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7793646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33425997
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.592909
work_keys_str_mv AT dahlegry currentdevicesintmviandtheirlimitationsfocusontendyne