Cargando…
PD-L1 and PD-L2 Expression in Cervical Cancer: Regulation and Biomarker Potential
PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors show potential for cervical cancer treatment. However, low response rates suggest that patient selection based on PD-L1 protein expression is not optimal. Here, we evaluated different PD-L1 detection methods and studied transcriptional regulation of PD-L1/PD-L...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7793653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33424844 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.596825 |
_version_ | 1783634033335336960 |
---|---|
author | Rotman, Jossie den Otter, Leontine A. S. Bleeker, Maaike C. G. Samuels, Sanne S. Heeren, A. Marijne Roemer, Margaretha G. M. Kenter, Gemma G. Zijlmans, Henry J. M. A. A. van Trommel, Nienke E. de Gruijl, Tanja D. Jordanova, Ekaterina S. |
author_facet | Rotman, Jossie den Otter, Leontine A. S. Bleeker, Maaike C. G. Samuels, Sanne S. Heeren, A. Marijne Roemer, Margaretha G. M. Kenter, Gemma G. Zijlmans, Henry J. M. A. A. van Trommel, Nienke E. de Gruijl, Tanja D. Jordanova, Ekaterina S. |
author_sort | Rotman, Jossie |
collection | PubMed |
description | PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors show potential for cervical cancer treatment. However, low response rates suggest that patient selection based on PD-L1 protein expression is not optimal. Here, we evaluated different PD-L1 detection methods and studied transcriptional regulation of PD-L1/PD-L2 expression by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) mRNAseq analysis. First, we determined the copy number of the PD-L1/PD-L2 locus by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), PD-L1 mRNA expression by RNA in situ hybridization (RNAish), and PD-L1/PD-L2 protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on tissue microarrays containing a cohort of 60 patients. Additionally, distribution of PD-L1/PD-L2 was visualized based on flow cytometry analysis of single-cell suspensions (n = 10). PD-L1/PD-L2 locus amplification was rare (2%). PD-L1 mRNA expression in tumor cells was detected in 56% of cases, while 41% expressed PD-L1 protein. Discordant scores for PD-L1 protein expression on tumor cells between cores from one patient were observed in 27% of cases. Interestingly, with RNAish, PD-L1 heterogeneity was observed in only 11% of the cases. PD-L2 protein expression was found in 53%. PD-L1 mRNA and protein expression on tumor cells were strongly correlated (p < 0.001). PD-L1 and PD-L2 protein expression showed no correlation on tumor cells (p = 0.837), but a strong correlation on cells in stromal fields (p < 0.001). Co-expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 on macrophage-like populations was also observed with flow cytometry analysis. Both PD-L1 and PD-L2 TCGA transcript levels strongly correlated in the TCGA data, and both PD-L1 and PD-L2 strongly correlated with interferon gamma (IFNG) expression/transcript levels (p < 0.0001). Importantly, patients with high PD-L1/PD-L2/IFNG transcript levels had a survival advantage over patients with high PD-L1/PD-L2 and low IFNG expression. Based on these findings, we conclude that PD-L1/PD-L2 expression in cervical cancer is mainly associated with interferon induction and not gene amplification, which makes FISH unsuitable as biomarker. The heterogeneous PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression patterns suggest IHC unreliable for patient selection. RNAish, in conjunction with interferon signaling evaluation, seems a promising technique for immune checkpoint detection. These results warrant further investigation into their prognostic and predictive potential. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7793653 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77936532021-01-09 PD-L1 and PD-L2 Expression in Cervical Cancer: Regulation and Biomarker Potential Rotman, Jossie den Otter, Leontine A. S. Bleeker, Maaike C. G. Samuels, Sanne S. Heeren, A. Marijne Roemer, Margaretha G. M. Kenter, Gemma G. Zijlmans, Henry J. M. A. A. van Trommel, Nienke E. de Gruijl, Tanja D. Jordanova, Ekaterina S. Front Immunol Immunology PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors show potential for cervical cancer treatment. However, low response rates suggest that patient selection based on PD-L1 protein expression is not optimal. Here, we evaluated different PD-L1 detection methods and studied transcriptional regulation of PD-L1/PD-L2 expression by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) mRNAseq analysis. First, we determined the copy number of the PD-L1/PD-L2 locus by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), PD-L1 mRNA expression by RNA in situ hybridization (RNAish), and PD-L1/PD-L2 protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on tissue microarrays containing a cohort of 60 patients. Additionally, distribution of PD-L1/PD-L2 was visualized based on flow cytometry analysis of single-cell suspensions (n = 10). PD-L1/PD-L2 locus amplification was rare (2%). PD-L1 mRNA expression in tumor cells was detected in 56% of cases, while 41% expressed PD-L1 protein. Discordant scores for PD-L1 protein expression on tumor cells between cores from one patient were observed in 27% of cases. Interestingly, with RNAish, PD-L1 heterogeneity was observed in only 11% of the cases. PD-L2 protein expression was found in 53%. PD-L1 mRNA and protein expression on tumor cells were strongly correlated (p < 0.001). PD-L1 and PD-L2 protein expression showed no correlation on tumor cells (p = 0.837), but a strong correlation on cells in stromal fields (p < 0.001). Co-expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 on macrophage-like populations was also observed with flow cytometry analysis. Both PD-L1 and PD-L2 TCGA transcript levels strongly correlated in the TCGA data, and both PD-L1 and PD-L2 strongly correlated with interferon gamma (IFNG) expression/transcript levels (p < 0.0001). Importantly, patients with high PD-L1/PD-L2/IFNG transcript levels had a survival advantage over patients with high PD-L1/PD-L2 and low IFNG expression. Based on these findings, we conclude that PD-L1/PD-L2 expression in cervical cancer is mainly associated with interferon induction and not gene amplification, which makes FISH unsuitable as biomarker. The heterogeneous PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression patterns suggest IHC unreliable for patient selection. RNAish, in conjunction with interferon signaling evaluation, seems a promising technique for immune checkpoint detection. These results warrant further investigation into their prognostic and predictive potential. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7793653/ /pubmed/33424844 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.596825 Text en Copyright © 2020 Rotman, Otter, Bleeker, Samuels, Heeren, Roemer, Kenter, Zijlmans, van Trommel, de Gruijl and Jordanova http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology Rotman, Jossie den Otter, Leontine A. S. Bleeker, Maaike C. G. Samuels, Sanne S. Heeren, A. Marijne Roemer, Margaretha G. M. Kenter, Gemma G. Zijlmans, Henry J. M. A. A. van Trommel, Nienke E. de Gruijl, Tanja D. Jordanova, Ekaterina S. PD-L1 and PD-L2 Expression in Cervical Cancer: Regulation and Biomarker Potential |
title | PD-L1 and PD-L2 Expression in Cervical Cancer: Regulation and Biomarker Potential |
title_full | PD-L1 and PD-L2 Expression in Cervical Cancer: Regulation and Biomarker Potential |
title_fullStr | PD-L1 and PD-L2 Expression in Cervical Cancer: Regulation and Biomarker Potential |
title_full_unstemmed | PD-L1 and PD-L2 Expression in Cervical Cancer: Regulation and Biomarker Potential |
title_short | PD-L1 and PD-L2 Expression in Cervical Cancer: Regulation and Biomarker Potential |
title_sort | pd-l1 and pd-l2 expression in cervical cancer: regulation and biomarker potential |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7793653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33424844 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.596825 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rotmanjossie pdl1andpdl2expressionincervicalcancerregulationandbiomarkerpotential AT denotterleontineas pdl1andpdl2expressionincervicalcancerregulationandbiomarkerpotential AT bleekermaaikecg pdl1andpdl2expressionincervicalcancerregulationandbiomarkerpotential AT samuelssannes pdl1andpdl2expressionincervicalcancerregulationandbiomarkerpotential AT heerenamarijne pdl1andpdl2expressionincervicalcancerregulationandbiomarkerpotential AT roemermargarethagm pdl1andpdl2expressionincervicalcancerregulationandbiomarkerpotential AT kentergemmag pdl1andpdl2expressionincervicalcancerregulationandbiomarkerpotential AT zijlmanshenryjmaa pdl1andpdl2expressionincervicalcancerregulationandbiomarkerpotential AT vantrommelnienkee pdl1andpdl2expressionincervicalcancerregulationandbiomarkerpotential AT degruijltanjad pdl1andpdl2expressionincervicalcancerregulationandbiomarkerpotential AT jordanovaekaterinas pdl1andpdl2expressionincervicalcancerregulationandbiomarkerpotential |