Cargando…
The Burnout Phenomenon: A Résumé After More Than 15,000 Scientific Publications
The “burnout” phenomenon, supposedly caused by work related stress, is a challenge for academic psychiatry both conceptually and professionally. Since the first description of burnout in 1974 until today, more than 140 definitions have been suggested. Burnout–symptomatology's main characteristi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7793987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33424648 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.519237 |
_version_ | 1783634114169012224 |
---|---|
author | Hillert, Andreas Albrecht, Arnd Voderholzer, Ulrich |
author_facet | Hillert, Andreas Albrecht, Arnd Voderholzer, Ulrich |
author_sort | Hillert, Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | The “burnout” phenomenon, supposedly caused by work related stress, is a challenge for academic psychiatry both conceptually and professionally. Since the first description of burnout in 1974 until today, more than 140 definitions have been suggested. Burnout–symptomatology's main characteristic, the experience of exhaustion, is unspecific. Different development–models of burnout were proposed, assumed to depict a quasi-natural process. These could not be confirmed empirically. An expert consensus on the diagnostic criteria and the conceptual location, whether as an independent disorder or as a risk, could not be agreed on. Nevertheless, the phenomenon of burnout in the ICD-11 is considered to be categorized as a work-related disorder. Psychiatric research on the burnout–phenomenon ignores problems of definition resulting from different perspectives: It may meet societal expectations, but does not fulfill scientific criteria, and therefore is not suitable to establish an objective diagnosis and treatment. Parallel detection of ICD/DSM diagnoses from an expert perspective and subjective perturbation models are considered appropriate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7793987 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77939872021-01-09 The Burnout Phenomenon: A Résumé After More Than 15,000 Scientific Publications Hillert, Andreas Albrecht, Arnd Voderholzer, Ulrich Front Psychiatry Psychiatry The “burnout” phenomenon, supposedly caused by work related stress, is a challenge for academic psychiatry both conceptually and professionally. Since the first description of burnout in 1974 until today, more than 140 definitions have been suggested. Burnout–symptomatology's main characteristic, the experience of exhaustion, is unspecific. Different development–models of burnout were proposed, assumed to depict a quasi-natural process. These could not be confirmed empirically. An expert consensus on the diagnostic criteria and the conceptual location, whether as an independent disorder or as a risk, could not be agreed on. Nevertheless, the phenomenon of burnout in the ICD-11 is considered to be categorized as a work-related disorder. Psychiatric research on the burnout–phenomenon ignores problems of definition resulting from different perspectives: It may meet societal expectations, but does not fulfill scientific criteria, and therefore is not suitable to establish an objective diagnosis and treatment. Parallel detection of ICD/DSM diagnoses from an expert perspective and subjective perturbation models are considered appropriate. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7793987/ /pubmed/33424648 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.519237 Text en Copyright © 2020 Hillert, Albrecht and Voderholzer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Hillert, Andreas Albrecht, Arnd Voderholzer, Ulrich The Burnout Phenomenon: A Résumé After More Than 15,000 Scientific Publications |
title | The Burnout Phenomenon: A Résumé After More Than 15,000 Scientific Publications |
title_full | The Burnout Phenomenon: A Résumé After More Than 15,000 Scientific Publications |
title_fullStr | The Burnout Phenomenon: A Résumé After More Than 15,000 Scientific Publications |
title_full_unstemmed | The Burnout Phenomenon: A Résumé After More Than 15,000 Scientific Publications |
title_short | The Burnout Phenomenon: A Résumé After More Than 15,000 Scientific Publications |
title_sort | burnout phenomenon: a résumé after more than 15,000 scientific publications |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7793987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33424648 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.519237 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hillertandreas theburnoutphenomenonaresumeaftermorethan15000scientificpublications AT albrechtarnd theburnoutphenomenonaresumeaftermorethan15000scientificpublications AT voderholzerulrich theburnoutphenomenonaresumeaftermorethan15000scientificpublications AT hillertandreas burnoutphenomenonaresumeaftermorethan15000scientificpublications AT albrechtarnd burnoutphenomenonaresumeaftermorethan15000scientificpublications AT voderholzerulrich burnoutphenomenonaresumeaftermorethan15000scientificpublications |