Cargando…

Comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation under anesthesia influence in a controlled animal model

The brain’s ability to maintain cerebral blood flow approximately constant despite cerebral perfusion pressure changes is known as cerebral autoregulation (CA) and is governed by vasoconstriction and vasodilation. Cerebral perfusion pressure is defined as the pressure gradient between arterial blood...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruesch, Alexander, Acharya, Deepshikha, Schmitt, Samantha, Yang, Jason, Smith, Matthew A., Kainerstorfer, Jana M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7794034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33418561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245291
_version_ 1783634125374095360
author Ruesch, Alexander
Acharya, Deepshikha
Schmitt, Samantha
Yang, Jason
Smith, Matthew A.
Kainerstorfer, Jana M.
author_facet Ruesch, Alexander
Acharya, Deepshikha
Schmitt, Samantha
Yang, Jason
Smith, Matthew A.
Kainerstorfer, Jana M.
author_sort Ruesch, Alexander
collection PubMed
description The brain’s ability to maintain cerebral blood flow approximately constant despite cerebral perfusion pressure changes is known as cerebral autoregulation (CA) and is governed by vasoconstriction and vasodilation. Cerebral perfusion pressure is defined as the pressure gradient between arterial blood pressure and intracranial pressure. Measuring CA is a challenging task and has created a variety of evaluation methods, which are often categorized as static and dynamic CA assessments. Because CA is quantified as the performance of a regulatory system and no physical ground truth can be measured, conflicting results are reported. The conflict further arises from a lack of healthy volunteer data with respect to cerebral perfusion pressure measurements and the variety of diseases in which CA ability is impaired, including stroke, traumatic brain injury and hydrocephalus. To overcome these differences, we present a healthy non-human primate model in which we can control the ability to autoregulate blood flow through the type of anesthesia (isoflurane vs fentanyl). We show how three different assessment methods can be used to measure CA impairment, and how static and dynamic autoregulation compare under challenges in intracranial pressure and blood pressure. We reconstructed Lassen’s curve for two groups of anesthesia, where only the fentanyl anesthetized group yielded the canonical shape. Cerebral perfusion pressure allowed for the best distinction between the fentanyl and isoflurane anesthetized groups. The autoregulatory response time to induced oscillations in intracranial pressure and blood pressure, measured as the phase lag between intracranial pressure and blood pressure, was able to determine autoregulatory impairment in agreement with static autoregulation. Static and dynamic CA both show impairment in high dose isoflurane anesthesia, while low isoflurane in combination with fentanyl anesthesia maintains CA, offering a repeatable animal model for CA studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7794034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77940342021-01-21 Comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation under anesthesia influence in a controlled animal model Ruesch, Alexander Acharya, Deepshikha Schmitt, Samantha Yang, Jason Smith, Matthew A. Kainerstorfer, Jana M. PLoS One Research Article The brain’s ability to maintain cerebral blood flow approximately constant despite cerebral perfusion pressure changes is known as cerebral autoregulation (CA) and is governed by vasoconstriction and vasodilation. Cerebral perfusion pressure is defined as the pressure gradient between arterial blood pressure and intracranial pressure. Measuring CA is a challenging task and has created a variety of evaluation methods, which are often categorized as static and dynamic CA assessments. Because CA is quantified as the performance of a regulatory system and no physical ground truth can be measured, conflicting results are reported. The conflict further arises from a lack of healthy volunteer data with respect to cerebral perfusion pressure measurements and the variety of diseases in which CA ability is impaired, including stroke, traumatic brain injury and hydrocephalus. To overcome these differences, we present a healthy non-human primate model in which we can control the ability to autoregulate blood flow through the type of anesthesia (isoflurane vs fentanyl). We show how three different assessment methods can be used to measure CA impairment, and how static and dynamic autoregulation compare under challenges in intracranial pressure and blood pressure. We reconstructed Lassen’s curve for two groups of anesthesia, where only the fentanyl anesthetized group yielded the canonical shape. Cerebral perfusion pressure allowed for the best distinction between the fentanyl and isoflurane anesthetized groups. The autoregulatory response time to induced oscillations in intracranial pressure and blood pressure, measured as the phase lag between intracranial pressure and blood pressure, was able to determine autoregulatory impairment in agreement with static autoregulation. Static and dynamic CA both show impairment in high dose isoflurane anesthesia, while low isoflurane in combination with fentanyl anesthesia maintains CA, offering a repeatable animal model for CA studies. Public Library of Science 2021-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7794034/ /pubmed/33418561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245291 Text en © 2021 Ruesch et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ruesch, Alexander
Acharya, Deepshikha
Schmitt, Samantha
Yang, Jason
Smith, Matthew A.
Kainerstorfer, Jana M.
Comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation under anesthesia influence in a controlled animal model
title Comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation under anesthesia influence in a controlled animal model
title_full Comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation under anesthesia influence in a controlled animal model
title_fullStr Comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation under anesthesia influence in a controlled animal model
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation under anesthesia influence in a controlled animal model
title_short Comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation under anesthesia influence in a controlled animal model
title_sort comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation under anesthesia influence in a controlled animal model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7794034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33418561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245291
work_keys_str_mv AT rueschalexander comparisonofstaticanddynamiccerebralautoregulationunderanesthesiainfluenceinacontrolledanimalmodel
AT acharyadeepshikha comparisonofstaticanddynamiccerebralautoregulationunderanesthesiainfluenceinacontrolledanimalmodel
AT schmittsamantha comparisonofstaticanddynamiccerebralautoregulationunderanesthesiainfluenceinacontrolledanimalmodel
AT yangjason comparisonofstaticanddynamiccerebralautoregulationunderanesthesiainfluenceinacontrolledanimalmodel
AT smithmatthewa comparisonofstaticanddynamiccerebralautoregulationunderanesthesiainfluenceinacontrolledanimalmodel
AT kainerstorferjanam comparisonofstaticanddynamiccerebralautoregulationunderanesthesiainfluenceinacontrolledanimalmodel