Cargando…

Lymph node response to chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer patients: relationship with radiotherapy fields

BACKGROUND: The presence of lymph node metastasis (LNmets) is a poor prognostic factor in oesophageal cancer (OeC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery. Tumour regression grade (TRG) in LNmets has been suggested as a predictor for survival. The aim of this s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koemans, Willem J., Larue, Ruben T. H. M., Kloft, Maximilian, Ruisch, Jessica E., Compter, Inge, Riedl, Robert G., Heij, Lara R., van Elmpt, Wouter, Berbée, Maaike, Buijsen, Jeroen, Lambin, Philippe, Sosef, Meindert N., Grabsch, Heike I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7794105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32889674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10388-020-00777-y
_version_ 1783634138096467968
author Koemans, Willem J.
Larue, Ruben T. H. M.
Kloft, Maximilian
Ruisch, Jessica E.
Compter, Inge
Riedl, Robert G.
Heij, Lara R.
van Elmpt, Wouter
Berbée, Maaike
Buijsen, Jeroen
Lambin, Philippe
Sosef, Meindert N.
Grabsch, Heike I.
author_facet Koemans, Willem J.
Larue, Ruben T. H. M.
Kloft, Maximilian
Ruisch, Jessica E.
Compter, Inge
Riedl, Robert G.
Heij, Lara R.
van Elmpt, Wouter
Berbée, Maaike
Buijsen, Jeroen
Lambin, Philippe
Sosef, Meindert N.
Grabsch, Heike I.
author_sort Koemans, Willem J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The presence of lymph node metastasis (LNmets) is a poor prognostic factor in oesophageal cancer (OeC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery. Tumour regression grade (TRG) in LNmets has been suggested as a predictor for survival. The aim of this study was to investigate whether TRG in LNmets is related to their location within the radiotherapy (RT) field. METHODS: Histopathological TRG was retrospectively classified in 2565 lymph nodes (LNs) from 117 OeC patients treated with nCRT and surgery as: (A) no tumour, no signs of regression; (B) tumour without regression; (C) viable tumour and regression; and (D) complete response. Multivariate survival analysis was used to investigate the relationship between LN location within the RT field, pathological TRG of the LN and TRG of the primary tumour. RESULTS: In 63 (54%) patients, viable tumour cells or signs of regression were seen in 264 (10.2%) LNs which were classified as TRG-B (n = 56), C (n = 104) or D (n = 104) LNs. 73% of B, C and D LNs were located within the RT field. There was a trend towards a relationship between LN response and anatomical LN location with respect to the RT field (p = 0.052). Multivariate analysis showed that only the presence of LNmets within the RT field with TRG-B is related to poor overall survival. CONCLUSION: Patients have the best survival if all LNmets show tumour regression, even if LNmets are located outside the RT field. Response in LNmets to nCRT is heterogeneous which warrants further studies to better understand underlying mechanisms. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10388-020-00777-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7794105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77941052021-01-11 Lymph node response to chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer patients: relationship with radiotherapy fields Koemans, Willem J. Larue, Ruben T. H. M. Kloft, Maximilian Ruisch, Jessica E. Compter, Inge Riedl, Robert G. Heij, Lara R. van Elmpt, Wouter Berbée, Maaike Buijsen, Jeroen Lambin, Philippe Sosef, Meindert N. Grabsch, Heike I. Esophagus Original Article BACKGROUND: The presence of lymph node metastasis (LNmets) is a poor prognostic factor in oesophageal cancer (OeC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery. Tumour regression grade (TRG) in LNmets has been suggested as a predictor for survival. The aim of this study was to investigate whether TRG in LNmets is related to their location within the radiotherapy (RT) field. METHODS: Histopathological TRG was retrospectively classified in 2565 lymph nodes (LNs) from 117 OeC patients treated with nCRT and surgery as: (A) no tumour, no signs of regression; (B) tumour without regression; (C) viable tumour and regression; and (D) complete response. Multivariate survival analysis was used to investigate the relationship between LN location within the RT field, pathological TRG of the LN and TRG of the primary tumour. RESULTS: In 63 (54%) patients, viable tumour cells or signs of regression were seen in 264 (10.2%) LNs which were classified as TRG-B (n = 56), C (n = 104) or D (n = 104) LNs. 73% of B, C and D LNs were located within the RT field. There was a trend towards a relationship between LN response and anatomical LN location with respect to the RT field (p = 0.052). Multivariate analysis showed that only the presence of LNmets within the RT field with TRG-B is related to poor overall survival. CONCLUSION: Patients have the best survival if all LNmets show tumour regression, even if LNmets are located outside the RT field. Response in LNmets to nCRT is heterogeneous which warrants further studies to better understand underlying mechanisms. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10388-020-00777-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Singapore 2020-09-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7794105/ /pubmed/32889674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10388-020-00777-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Koemans, Willem J.
Larue, Ruben T. H. M.
Kloft, Maximilian
Ruisch, Jessica E.
Compter, Inge
Riedl, Robert G.
Heij, Lara R.
van Elmpt, Wouter
Berbée, Maaike
Buijsen, Jeroen
Lambin, Philippe
Sosef, Meindert N.
Grabsch, Heike I.
Lymph node response to chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer patients: relationship with radiotherapy fields
title Lymph node response to chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer patients: relationship with radiotherapy fields
title_full Lymph node response to chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer patients: relationship with radiotherapy fields
title_fullStr Lymph node response to chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer patients: relationship with radiotherapy fields
title_full_unstemmed Lymph node response to chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer patients: relationship with radiotherapy fields
title_short Lymph node response to chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer patients: relationship with radiotherapy fields
title_sort lymph node response to chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer patients: relationship with radiotherapy fields
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7794105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32889674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10388-020-00777-y
work_keys_str_mv AT koemanswillemj lymphnoderesponsetochemoradiotherapyinoesophagealcancerpatientsrelationshipwithradiotherapyfields
AT laruerubenthm lymphnoderesponsetochemoradiotherapyinoesophagealcancerpatientsrelationshipwithradiotherapyfields
AT kloftmaximilian lymphnoderesponsetochemoradiotherapyinoesophagealcancerpatientsrelationshipwithradiotherapyfields
AT ruischjessicae lymphnoderesponsetochemoradiotherapyinoesophagealcancerpatientsrelationshipwithradiotherapyfields
AT compteringe lymphnoderesponsetochemoradiotherapyinoesophagealcancerpatientsrelationshipwithradiotherapyfields
AT riedlrobertg lymphnoderesponsetochemoradiotherapyinoesophagealcancerpatientsrelationshipwithradiotherapyfields
AT heijlarar lymphnoderesponsetochemoradiotherapyinoesophagealcancerpatientsrelationshipwithradiotherapyfields
AT vanelmptwouter lymphnoderesponsetochemoradiotherapyinoesophagealcancerpatientsrelationshipwithradiotherapyfields
AT berbeemaaike lymphnoderesponsetochemoradiotherapyinoesophagealcancerpatientsrelationshipwithradiotherapyfields
AT buijsenjeroen lymphnoderesponsetochemoradiotherapyinoesophagealcancerpatientsrelationshipwithradiotherapyfields
AT lambinphilippe lymphnoderesponsetochemoradiotherapyinoesophagealcancerpatientsrelationshipwithradiotherapyfields
AT sosefmeindertn lymphnoderesponsetochemoradiotherapyinoesophagealcancerpatientsrelationshipwithradiotherapyfields
AT grabschheikei lymphnoderesponsetochemoradiotherapyinoesophagealcancerpatientsrelationshipwithradiotherapyfields