Cargando…
Biases in ecological research: attitudes of scientists and ways of control
The properties of the human mind affect the quality of scientific knowledge through the insertion of unconscious biases during the research process. These biases frequently cause overestimation of the effects under study, thereby violating the reproducibility of the research and potentially leading...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7794457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33420300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80677-4 |
_version_ | 1783634213262589952 |
---|---|
author | Zvereva, Elena L. Kozlov, Mikhail V. |
author_facet | Zvereva, Elena L. Kozlov, Mikhail V. |
author_sort | Zvereva, Elena L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The properties of the human mind affect the quality of scientific knowledge through the insertion of unconscious biases during the research process. These biases frequently cause overestimation of the effects under study, thereby violating the reproducibility of the research and potentially leading to incorrect conclusions in subsequent research syntheses. We explored the level of knowledge about biases and attitudes to this problem by analysing 308 responses of ecology scientists to a specifically developed survey. We show that knowledge about biases and attitude towards biases depend on the scientist’s career stage, gender and affiliation country. Early career scientists are more concerned about biases, know more about measures to avoid biases, and twice more frequently have learned about biases from their university courses when compared with senior scientists. The respondents believe that their own studies are less prone to biases than are studies by other scientists, which hampers the control of biases in one’s own research. We conclude that education about biases is necessary, but not yet sufficient, to avoid biases because the unconscious origin of biases necessitates external intervention to combat them. Obligatory reporting of measures taken against biases in all relevant manuscripts will likely enhance the reproducibility of scientific results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7794457 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77944572021-01-12 Biases in ecological research: attitudes of scientists and ways of control Zvereva, Elena L. Kozlov, Mikhail V. Sci Rep Article The properties of the human mind affect the quality of scientific knowledge through the insertion of unconscious biases during the research process. These biases frequently cause overestimation of the effects under study, thereby violating the reproducibility of the research and potentially leading to incorrect conclusions in subsequent research syntheses. We explored the level of knowledge about biases and attitudes to this problem by analysing 308 responses of ecology scientists to a specifically developed survey. We show that knowledge about biases and attitude towards biases depend on the scientist’s career stage, gender and affiliation country. Early career scientists are more concerned about biases, know more about measures to avoid biases, and twice more frequently have learned about biases from their university courses when compared with senior scientists. The respondents believe that their own studies are less prone to biases than are studies by other scientists, which hampers the control of biases in one’s own research. We conclude that education about biases is necessary, but not yet sufficient, to avoid biases because the unconscious origin of biases necessitates external intervention to combat them. Obligatory reporting of measures taken against biases in all relevant manuscripts will likely enhance the reproducibility of scientific results. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7794457/ /pubmed/33420300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80677-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Zvereva, Elena L. Kozlov, Mikhail V. Biases in ecological research: attitudes of scientists and ways of control |
title | Biases in ecological research: attitudes of scientists and ways of control |
title_full | Biases in ecological research: attitudes of scientists and ways of control |
title_fullStr | Biases in ecological research: attitudes of scientists and ways of control |
title_full_unstemmed | Biases in ecological research: attitudes of scientists and ways of control |
title_short | Biases in ecological research: attitudes of scientists and ways of control |
title_sort | biases in ecological research: attitudes of scientists and ways of control |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7794457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33420300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80677-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zverevaelenal biasesinecologicalresearchattitudesofscientistsandwaysofcontrol AT kozlovmikhailv biasesinecologicalresearchattitudesofscientistsandwaysofcontrol |