Cargando…

Hydrogen–methane breath testing results influenced by oral hygiene

The measurement of hydrogen–methane breath gases is widely used in gastroenterology to evaluate malabsorption syndromes and bacterial overgrowth. Laboratories offering breath testing provide variable guidance regarding oral hygiene practices prior to testing. Given that oral dysbiosis has the potent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Erdrich, Sharon, Tan, Edwin C. K., Hawrelak, Jason A., Myers, Stephen P., Harnett, Joanna E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7794545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33420116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79554-x
_version_ 1783634234454310912
author Erdrich, Sharon
Tan, Edwin C. K.
Hawrelak, Jason A.
Myers, Stephen P.
Harnett, Joanna E.
author_facet Erdrich, Sharon
Tan, Edwin C. K.
Hawrelak, Jason A.
Myers, Stephen P.
Harnett, Joanna E.
author_sort Erdrich, Sharon
collection PubMed
description The measurement of hydrogen–methane breath gases is widely used in gastroenterology to evaluate malabsorption syndromes and bacterial overgrowth. Laboratories offering breath testing provide variable guidance regarding oral hygiene practices prior to testing. Given that oral dysbiosis has the potential to cause changes in breath gases, it raises concerns that oral hygiene is not a standard inclusion in current breath testing guidelines. The aim of this study was to determine how a pre-test mouthwash may impact hydrogen–methane breath test results. Participants presenting for breath testing who had elevated baseline gases were given a chlorhexidine mouthwash. If a substantial reduction in expired hydrogen or methane occurred after the mouthwash, breath samples were collected before and after a mouthwash at all breath sample collection points for the duration of testing. Data were evaluated to determine how the mouthwash might influence test results and diagnostic status. In 388 consecutive hydrogen–methane breath tests, modifiable elevations occurred in 24.7%. Administration of a chlorhexidine mouthwash resulted in significantly (p ≤ 0.05) reduced breath hydrogen in 67% and/or methane gas in 93% of those consenting to inclusion. In some cases, this modified the diagnosis. Mean total gas concentrations pre- and post-mouthwash were 221.0 ppm and 152.1 ppm (p < 0.0001) for hydrogen, and 368.9 ppm and 249.8 ppm (p < 0.0001) for methane. Data suggest that a single mouthwash at baseline has a high probability of returning a false positive diagnosis. Variations in gas production due to oral hygiene practices has significant impacts on test interpretation and the subsequent diagnosis. The role of oral dysbiosis in causing gastrointestinal symptoms also demands exploration as it may be an underlying factor in the presenting condition that was the basis for the referral.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7794545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77945452021-01-12 Hydrogen–methane breath testing results influenced by oral hygiene Erdrich, Sharon Tan, Edwin C. K. Hawrelak, Jason A. Myers, Stephen P. Harnett, Joanna E. Sci Rep Article The measurement of hydrogen–methane breath gases is widely used in gastroenterology to evaluate malabsorption syndromes and bacterial overgrowth. Laboratories offering breath testing provide variable guidance regarding oral hygiene practices prior to testing. Given that oral dysbiosis has the potential to cause changes in breath gases, it raises concerns that oral hygiene is not a standard inclusion in current breath testing guidelines. The aim of this study was to determine how a pre-test mouthwash may impact hydrogen–methane breath test results. Participants presenting for breath testing who had elevated baseline gases were given a chlorhexidine mouthwash. If a substantial reduction in expired hydrogen or methane occurred after the mouthwash, breath samples were collected before and after a mouthwash at all breath sample collection points for the duration of testing. Data were evaluated to determine how the mouthwash might influence test results and diagnostic status. In 388 consecutive hydrogen–methane breath tests, modifiable elevations occurred in 24.7%. Administration of a chlorhexidine mouthwash resulted in significantly (p ≤ 0.05) reduced breath hydrogen in 67% and/or methane gas in 93% of those consenting to inclusion. In some cases, this modified the diagnosis. Mean total gas concentrations pre- and post-mouthwash were 221.0 ppm and 152.1 ppm (p < 0.0001) for hydrogen, and 368.9 ppm and 249.8 ppm (p < 0.0001) for methane. Data suggest that a single mouthwash at baseline has a high probability of returning a false positive diagnosis. Variations in gas production due to oral hygiene practices has significant impacts on test interpretation and the subsequent diagnosis. The role of oral dysbiosis in causing gastrointestinal symptoms also demands exploration as it may be an underlying factor in the presenting condition that was the basis for the referral. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7794545/ /pubmed/33420116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79554-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Erdrich, Sharon
Tan, Edwin C. K.
Hawrelak, Jason A.
Myers, Stephen P.
Harnett, Joanna E.
Hydrogen–methane breath testing results influenced by oral hygiene
title Hydrogen–methane breath testing results influenced by oral hygiene
title_full Hydrogen–methane breath testing results influenced by oral hygiene
title_fullStr Hydrogen–methane breath testing results influenced by oral hygiene
title_full_unstemmed Hydrogen–methane breath testing results influenced by oral hygiene
title_short Hydrogen–methane breath testing results influenced by oral hygiene
title_sort hydrogen–methane breath testing results influenced by oral hygiene
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7794545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33420116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79554-x
work_keys_str_mv AT erdrichsharon hydrogenmethanebreathtestingresultsinfluencedbyoralhygiene
AT tanedwinck hydrogenmethanebreathtestingresultsinfluencedbyoralhygiene
AT hawrelakjasona hydrogenmethanebreathtestingresultsinfluencedbyoralhygiene
AT myersstephenp hydrogenmethanebreathtestingresultsinfluencedbyoralhygiene
AT harnettjoannae hydrogenmethanebreathtestingresultsinfluencedbyoralhygiene