Cargando…

Analysis and Assessment through Mechanical Static Compression Tests of Damping Capacity in a Series of Orthosis Plantar Materials Used as Supports

High plantar pressure is the cause of multiple types of foot injuries and one of the main reasons for patient visits in podiatry and traumatology. Therefore, there is a need to acquire specific tools to address such injuries. The aim of this study was to determine the absorption capacity of selected...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pabón-Carrasco, Manuel, Reina-Bueno, María, Vilar-Palomo, Samuel, Palomo-Toucedo, Inmaculada C., Ramos-Ortega, Javier, Juárez-Jiménez, José María
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7794760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33375277
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010115
_version_ 1783634284831047680
author Pabón-Carrasco, Manuel
Reina-Bueno, María
Vilar-Palomo, Samuel
Palomo-Toucedo, Inmaculada C.
Ramos-Ortega, Javier
Juárez-Jiménez, José María
author_facet Pabón-Carrasco, Manuel
Reina-Bueno, María
Vilar-Palomo, Samuel
Palomo-Toucedo, Inmaculada C.
Ramos-Ortega, Javier
Juárez-Jiménez, José María
author_sort Pabón-Carrasco, Manuel
collection PubMed
description High plantar pressure is the cause of multiple types of foot injuries and one of the main reasons for patient visits in podiatry and traumatology. Therefore, there is a need to acquire specific tools to address such injuries. The aim of this study was to determine the absorption capacity of selected materials applied as plantar supports and their response to pressure. The study had a cross-sectional design. A total of 21 materials were chosen and different material families were assessed, including ethylene-vinyl acetate, polyurethane foams, and polyethylene foams. Static compression tests were performed to analyze each material. The system is ideally suited for lower-force applications, small components, biomedical applications, and lower-strength materials. Damping was determined using mathematical calculations performed on the study data. It was found that materials with a low Shore A, or soft materials, exhibited worse absorption capacity than harder materials. Ethyl-vinyl acetates had good absorption capacity, polyurethane foams had a poor absorption capacity, and soft materials provided better adaption to impact. The results suggested that damping is not determined by the hardness of the material, and materials within the same family exhibit different damping capabilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7794760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77947602021-01-10 Analysis and Assessment through Mechanical Static Compression Tests of Damping Capacity in a Series of Orthosis Plantar Materials Used as Supports Pabón-Carrasco, Manuel Reina-Bueno, María Vilar-Palomo, Samuel Palomo-Toucedo, Inmaculada C. Ramos-Ortega, Javier Juárez-Jiménez, José María Int J Environ Res Public Health Article High plantar pressure is the cause of multiple types of foot injuries and one of the main reasons for patient visits in podiatry and traumatology. Therefore, there is a need to acquire specific tools to address such injuries. The aim of this study was to determine the absorption capacity of selected materials applied as plantar supports and their response to pressure. The study had a cross-sectional design. A total of 21 materials were chosen and different material families were assessed, including ethylene-vinyl acetate, polyurethane foams, and polyethylene foams. Static compression tests were performed to analyze each material. The system is ideally suited for lower-force applications, small components, biomedical applications, and lower-strength materials. Damping was determined using mathematical calculations performed on the study data. It was found that materials with a low Shore A, or soft materials, exhibited worse absorption capacity than harder materials. Ethyl-vinyl acetates had good absorption capacity, polyurethane foams had a poor absorption capacity, and soft materials provided better adaption to impact. The results suggested that damping is not determined by the hardness of the material, and materials within the same family exhibit different damping capabilities. MDPI 2020-12-26 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7794760/ /pubmed/33375277 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010115 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pabón-Carrasco, Manuel
Reina-Bueno, María
Vilar-Palomo, Samuel
Palomo-Toucedo, Inmaculada C.
Ramos-Ortega, Javier
Juárez-Jiménez, José María
Analysis and Assessment through Mechanical Static Compression Tests of Damping Capacity in a Series of Orthosis Plantar Materials Used as Supports
title Analysis and Assessment through Mechanical Static Compression Tests of Damping Capacity in a Series of Orthosis Plantar Materials Used as Supports
title_full Analysis and Assessment through Mechanical Static Compression Tests of Damping Capacity in a Series of Orthosis Plantar Materials Used as Supports
title_fullStr Analysis and Assessment through Mechanical Static Compression Tests of Damping Capacity in a Series of Orthosis Plantar Materials Used as Supports
title_full_unstemmed Analysis and Assessment through Mechanical Static Compression Tests of Damping Capacity in a Series of Orthosis Plantar Materials Used as Supports
title_short Analysis and Assessment through Mechanical Static Compression Tests of Damping Capacity in a Series of Orthosis Plantar Materials Used as Supports
title_sort analysis and assessment through mechanical static compression tests of damping capacity in a series of orthosis plantar materials used as supports
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7794760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33375277
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010115
work_keys_str_mv AT paboncarrascomanuel analysisandassessmentthroughmechanicalstaticcompressiontestsofdampingcapacityinaseriesoforthosisplantarmaterialsusedassupports
AT reinabuenomaria analysisandassessmentthroughmechanicalstaticcompressiontestsofdampingcapacityinaseriesoforthosisplantarmaterialsusedassupports
AT vilarpalomosamuel analysisandassessmentthroughmechanicalstaticcompressiontestsofdampingcapacityinaseriesoforthosisplantarmaterialsusedassupports
AT palomotoucedoinmaculadac analysisandassessmentthroughmechanicalstaticcompressiontestsofdampingcapacityinaseriesoforthosisplantarmaterialsusedassupports
AT ramosortegajavier analysisandassessmentthroughmechanicalstaticcompressiontestsofdampingcapacityinaseriesoforthosisplantarmaterialsusedassupports
AT juarezjimenezjosemaria analysisandassessmentthroughmechanicalstaticcompressiontestsofdampingcapacityinaseriesoforthosisplantarmaterialsusedassupports