Cargando…
Clinical Performance and Future Potential of Magnetic Resonance Thermometry in Hyperthermia
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Hyperthermia is a treatment for cancer patients, which consists of heating the body to 43 °C. The temperature during treatment is usually measured by placing temperature probes intraluminal or invasively. The only clinically used option to measure temperature distributions non-invasi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7794787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33374176 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13010031 |
_version_ | 1783634291127746560 |
---|---|
author | Feddersen, Theresa V. Hernandez-Tamames, Juan A. Franckena, Martine van Rhoon, Gerard C. Paulides, Margarethus M. |
author_facet | Feddersen, Theresa V. Hernandez-Tamames, Juan A. Franckena, Martine van Rhoon, Gerard C. Paulides, Margarethus M. |
author_sort | Feddersen, Theresa V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Hyperthermia is a treatment for cancer patients, which consists of heating the body to 43 °C. The temperature during treatment is usually measured by placing temperature probes intraluminal or invasively. The only clinically used option to measure temperature distributions non-invasively and in 3D is by MR thermometry (MRT). However, in order to be able to replace conventional temperature probes, MRT needs to become more reliable. In this review paper, we propose standardized performance thresholds for MRT, based on our experience of treating nearly 4000 patients. We then review the literature to assess to what extent these requirements are already being met in the clinic today and identify common problems. Lastly, using pre-clinical results in the literature, we assess where the biggest potential is to solve the problems identified. We hope that by standardizing MRT parameters as well as highlighting current and promising developments, progress in the field will be accelerated. ABSTRACT: Hyperthermia treatments in the clinic rely on accurate temperature measurements to guide treatments and evaluate clinical outcome. Currently, magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) is the only clinical option to non-invasively measure 3D temperature distributions. In this review, we evaluate the status quo and emerging approaches in this evolving technology for replacing conventional dosimetry based on intraluminal or invasively placed probes. First, we define standardized MRT performance thresholds, aiming at facilitating transparency in this field when comparing MR temperature mapping performance for the various scenarios that hyperthermia is currently applied in the clinic. This is based upon our clinical experience of treating nearly 4000 patients with superficial and deep hyperthermia. Second, we perform a systematic literature review, assessing MRT performance in (I) clinical and (II) pre-clinical papers. From (I) we identify the current clinical status of MRT, including the problems faced and from (II) we extract promising new techniques with the potential to accelerate progress. From (I) we found that the basic requirements for MRT during hyperthermia in the clinic are largely met for regions without motion, for example extremities. In more challenging regions (abdomen and thorax), progress has been stagnating after the clinical introduction of MRT-guided hyperthermia over 20 years ago. One clear difficulty for advancement is that performance is not or not uniformly reported, but also that studies often omit important details regarding their approach. Motion was found to be the common main issue hindering accurate MRT. Based on (II), we reported and highlighted promising developments to tackle the issues resulting from motion (directly or indirectly), including new developments as well as optimization of already existing strategies. Combined, these may have the potential to facilitate improvement in MRT in the form of more stable and reliable measurements via better stability and accuracy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7794787 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77947872021-01-10 Clinical Performance and Future Potential of Magnetic Resonance Thermometry in Hyperthermia Feddersen, Theresa V. Hernandez-Tamames, Juan A. Franckena, Martine van Rhoon, Gerard C. Paulides, Margarethus M. Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Hyperthermia is a treatment for cancer patients, which consists of heating the body to 43 °C. The temperature during treatment is usually measured by placing temperature probes intraluminal or invasively. The only clinically used option to measure temperature distributions non-invasively and in 3D is by MR thermometry (MRT). However, in order to be able to replace conventional temperature probes, MRT needs to become more reliable. In this review paper, we propose standardized performance thresholds for MRT, based on our experience of treating nearly 4000 patients. We then review the literature to assess to what extent these requirements are already being met in the clinic today and identify common problems. Lastly, using pre-clinical results in the literature, we assess where the biggest potential is to solve the problems identified. We hope that by standardizing MRT parameters as well as highlighting current and promising developments, progress in the field will be accelerated. ABSTRACT: Hyperthermia treatments in the clinic rely on accurate temperature measurements to guide treatments and evaluate clinical outcome. Currently, magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) is the only clinical option to non-invasively measure 3D temperature distributions. In this review, we evaluate the status quo and emerging approaches in this evolving technology for replacing conventional dosimetry based on intraluminal or invasively placed probes. First, we define standardized MRT performance thresholds, aiming at facilitating transparency in this field when comparing MR temperature mapping performance for the various scenarios that hyperthermia is currently applied in the clinic. This is based upon our clinical experience of treating nearly 4000 patients with superficial and deep hyperthermia. Second, we perform a systematic literature review, assessing MRT performance in (I) clinical and (II) pre-clinical papers. From (I) we identify the current clinical status of MRT, including the problems faced and from (II) we extract promising new techniques with the potential to accelerate progress. From (I) we found that the basic requirements for MRT during hyperthermia in the clinic are largely met for regions without motion, for example extremities. In more challenging regions (abdomen and thorax), progress has been stagnating after the clinical introduction of MRT-guided hyperthermia over 20 years ago. One clear difficulty for advancement is that performance is not or not uniformly reported, but also that studies often omit important details regarding their approach. Motion was found to be the common main issue hindering accurate MRT. Based on (II), we reported and highlighted promising developments to tackle the issues resulting from motion (directly or indirectly), including new developments as well as optimization of already existing strategies. Combined, these may have the potential to facilitate improvement in MRT in the form of more stable and reliable measurements via better stability and accuracy. MDPI 2020-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7794787/ /pubmed/33374176 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13010031 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Feddersen, Theresa V. Hernandez-Tamames, Juan A. Franckena, Martine van Rhoon, Gerard C. Paulides, Margarethus M. Clinical Performance and Future Potential of Magnetic Resonance Thermometry in Hyperthermia |
title | Clinical Performance and Future Potential of Magnetic Resonance Thermometry in Hyperthermia |
title_full | Clinical Performance and Future Potential of Magnetic Resonance Thermometry in Hyperthermia |
title_fullStr | Clinical Performance and Future Potential of Magnetic Resonance Thermometry in Hyperthermia |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Performance and Future Potential of Magnetic Resonance Thermometry in Hyperthermia |
title_short | Clinical Performance and Future Potential of Magnetic Resonance Thermometry in Hyperthermia |
title_sort | clinical performance and future potential of magnetic resonance thermometry in hyperthermia |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7794787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33374176 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13010031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT feddersentheresav clinicalperformanceandfuturepotentialofmagneticresonancethermometryinhyperthermia AT hernandeztamamesjuana clinicalperformanceandfuturepotentialofmagneticresonancethermometryinhyperthermia AT franckenamartine clinicalperformanceandfuturepotentialofmagneticresonancethermometryinhyperthermia AT vanrhoongerardc clinicalperformanceandfuturepotentialofmagneticresonancethermometryinhyperthermia AT paulidesmargarethusm clinicalperformanceandfuturepotentialofmagneticresonancethermometryinhyperthermia |