Cargando…

There Are No Differences in Positive Surgical Margin Rates or Biochemical Failure–Free Survival among Patients Receiving Open, Laparoscopic, or Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study from the National Cancer Database

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Few studies have evaluated oncologic outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (PC) receiving open, laparoscopic, or robotic radical prostatectomy (RP). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first and largest study to examine PSM and BFS rates in patients with PC undergoing open,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Shyh-Chyi, Chen, Ho-Min, Wu, Szu-Yuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7795659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33396327
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13010106
_version_ 1783634497235845120
author Chang, Shyh-Chyi
Chen, Ho-Min
Wu, Szu-Yuan
author_facet Chang, Shyh-Chyi
Chen, Ho-Min
Wu, Szu-Yuan
author_sort Chang, Shyh-Chyi
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Few studies have evaluated oncologic outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (PC) receiving open, laparoscopic, or robotic radical prostatectomy (RP). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first and largest study to examine PSM and BFS rates in patients with PC undergoing open, laparoscopic, or robotic RP. After adjustment for confounders, no significant differences in PSM or BFS were noted among the patient groups. ABSTRACT: Purpose: To estimate the rates of positive surgical margin (PSM) and biochemical failure–free survival (BFS) among patients with prostate cancer (PC) receiving open, laparoscopic, or robotic radical prostatectomy (RP). Patients and Methods: The patients were men enrolled in the Taiwan Cancer Registry diagnosed as having PC without distant metastasis who received RP. After adjustment for confounders, logistic regression was used to model the risk of PSM following RP. After adjustment for confounders, Cox proportional regression was used to model the time from the index (i.e., surgical) date to biochemical recurrence. Results: The adjusted odds ratios (95% CIs) of PSM risk after propensity score adjustment for laparoscopic versus open, robotic versus open, and robotic versus laparoscopic RP 95% CIs were 1.25 (0.88 to 1.77; p = 0.2064), 1.16 (0.88 to 1.53; p = 0.2847), and 0.93 (0.70 to 1.24; p = 0.6185), respectively. The corresponding adjusted hazard ratios (95% CIs) of risk of biochemical failure after propensity score adjustment were 1.16 (0.93 to 1.47; p = 0.1940), 1.10 (0.83 to 1.47; p = 0.5085), and 0.95 (0.74 to 1.21; p = 0.6582). Conclusions: No significant differences in PSM or BFS were observed among patients receiving open, laparoscopic, or robotic RP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7795659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77956592021-01-10 There Are No Differences in Positive Surgical Margin Rates or Biochemical Failure–Free Survival among Patients Receiving Open, Laparoscopic, or Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study from the National Cancer Database Chang, Shyh-Chyi Chen, Ho-Min Wu, Szu-Yuan Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Few studies have evaluated oncologic outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (PC) receiving open, laparoscopic, or robotic radical prostatectomy (RP). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first and largest study to examine PSM and BFS rates in patients with PC undergoing open, laparoscopic, or robotic RP. After adjustment for confounders, no significant differences in PSM or BFS were noted among the patient groups. ABSTRACT: Purpose: To estimate the rates of positive surgical margin (PSM) and biochemical failure–free survival (BFS) among patients with prostate cancer (PC) receiving open, laparoscopic, or robotic radical prostatectomy (RP). Patients and Methods: The patients were men enrolled in the Taiwan Cancer Registry diagnosed as having PC without distant metastasis who received RP. After adjustment for confounders, logistic regression was used to model the risk of PSM following RP. After adjustment for confounders, Cox proportional regression was used to model the time from the index (i.e., surgical) date to biochemical recurrence. Results: The adjusted odds ratios (95% CIs) of PSM risk after propensity score adjustment for laparoscopic versus open, robotic versus open, and robotic versus laparoscopic RP 95% CIs were 1.25 (0.88 to 1.77; p = 0.2064), 1.16 (0.88 to 1.53; p = 0.2847), and 0.93 (0.70 to 1.24; p = 0.6185), respectively. The corresponding adjusted hazard ratios (95% CIs) of risk of biochemical failure after propensity score adjustment were 1.16 (0.93 to 1.47; p = 0.1940), 1.10 (0.83 to 1.47; p = 0.5085), and 0.95 (0.74 to 1.21; p = 0.6582). Conclusions: No significant differences in PSM or BFS were observed among patients receiving open, laparoscopic, or robotic RP. MDPI 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7795659/ /pubmed/33396327 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13010106 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chang, Shyh-Chyi
Chen, Ho-Min
Wu, Szu-Yuan
There Are No Differences in Positive Surgical Margin Rates or Biochemical Failure–Free Survival among Patients Receiving Open, Laparoscopic, or Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study from the National Cancer Database
title There Are No Differences in Positive Surgical Margin Rates or Biochemical Failure–Free Survival among Patients Receiving Open, Laparoscopic, or Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study from the National Cancer Database
title_full There Are No Differences in Positive Surgical Margin Rates or Biochemical Failure–Free Survival among Patients Receiving Open, Laparoscopic, or Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study from the National Cancer Database
title_fullStr There Are No Differences in Positive Surgical Margin Rates or Biochemical Failure–Free Survival among Patients Receiving Open, Laparoscopic, or Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study from the National Cancer Database
title_full_unstemmed There Are No Differences in Positive Surgical Margin Rates or Biochemical Failure–Free Survival among Patients Receiving Open, Laparoscopic, or Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study from the National Cancer Database
title_short There Are No Differences in Positive Surgical Margin Rates or Biochemical Failure–Free Survival among Patients Receiving Open, Laparoscopic, or Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study from the National Cancer Database
title_sort there are no differences in positive surgical margin rates or biochemical failure–free survival among patients receiving open, laparoscopic, or robotic radical prostatectomy: a nationwide cohort study from the national cancer database
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7795659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33396327
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13010106
work_keys_str_mv AT changshyhchyi therearenodifferencesinpositivesurgicalmarginratesorbiochemicalfailurefreesurvivalamongpatientsreceivingopenlaparoscopicorroboticradicalprostatectomyanationwidecohortstudyfromthenationalcancerdatabase
AT chenhomin therearenodifferencesinpositivesurgicalmarginratesorbiochemicalfailurefreesurvivalamongpatientsreceivingopenlaparoscopicorroboticradicalprostatectomyanationwidecohortstudyfromthenationalcancerdatabase
AT wuszuyuan therearenodifferencesinpositivesurgicalmarginratesorbiochemicalfailurefreesurvivalamongpatientsreceivingopenlaparoscopicorroboticradicalprostatectomyanationwidecohortstudyfromthenationalcancerdatabase