Cargando…

Validating the Methods to Process the Stress Path in Multiaxial High-Cycle Fatigue Criteria

The paper discusses one of the key features in the multiaxial fatigue strength evaluation—the procedure in which the stress path is analyzed to provide relevant measures of parameters required by multiaxial criteria. The selection of this procedure affects the complete equivalent stress derived for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papuga, Jan, Cízová, Eva, Karolczuk, Aleksander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7796100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33406668
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14010206
_version_ 1783634601488416768
author Papuga, Jan
Cízová, Eva
Karolczuk, Aleksander
author_facet Papuga, Jan
Cízová, Eva
Karolczuk, Aleksander
author_sort Papuga, Jan
collection PubMed
description The paper discusses one of the key features in the multiaxial fatigue strength evaluation—the procedure in which the stress path is analyzed to provide relevant measures of parameters required by multiaxial criteria. The selection of this procedure affects the complete equivalent stress derived for any multiaxial load combinations. Three major concepts—the minimum circumscribed circle, minimum circumscribed ellipse, and moment of inertia methods—are described. Analytical solutions of their evaluation for multiaxial stress state with components described by harmonic functions are provided. The concepts are validated on available experimental data when included into six different multiaxial fatigue strength criteria. The results show that the moment of inertia results in too conservative results. Differences between both methods of circumscribed entities are much smaller. There are indications however that the minimum circumscribed ellipse solution works better for critical plane criteria and for the criteria based on stress tensor transformation into the Ilyushin deviatoric space. On the other hand, the minimum circumscribed ellipse solution tends to shift integral criteria to the conservative side.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7796100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77961002021-01-10 Validating the Methods to Process the Stress Path in Multiaxial High-Cycle Fatigue Criteria Papuga, Jan Cízová, Eva Karolczuk, Aleksander Materials (Basel) Article The paper discusses one of the key features in the multiaxial fatigue strength evaluation—the procedure in which the stress path is analyzed to provide relevant measures of parameters required by multiaxial criteria. The selection of this procedure affects the complete equivalent stress derived for any multiaxial load combinations. Three major concepts—the minimum circumscribed circle, minimum circumscribed ellipse, and moment of inertia methods—are described. Analytical solutions of their evaluation for multiaxial stress state with components described by harmonic functions are provided. The concepts are validated on available experimental data when included into six different multiaxial fatigue strength criteria. The results show that the moment of inertia results in too conservative results. Differences between both methods of circumscribed entities are much smaller. There are indications however that the minimum circumscribed ellipse solution works better for critical plane criteria and for the criteria based on stress tensor transformation into the Ilyushin deviatoric space. On the other hand, the minimum circumscribed ellipse solution tends to shift integral criteria to the conservative side. MDPI 2021-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7796100/ /pubmed/33406668 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14010206 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Papuga, Jan
Cízová, Eva
Karolczuk, Aleksander
Validating the Methods to Process the Stress Path in Multiaxial High-Cycle Fatigue Criteria
title Validating the Methods to Process the Stress Path in Multiaxial High-Cycle Fatigue Criteria
title_full Validating the Methods to Process the Stress Path in Multiaxial High-Cycle Fatigue Criteria
title_fullStr Validating the Methods to Process the Stress Path in Multiaxial High-Cycle Fatigue Criteria
title_full_unstemmed Validating the Methods to Process the Stress Path in Multiaxial High-Cycle Fatigue Criteria
title_short Validating the Methods to Process the Stress Path in Multiaxial High-Cycle Fatigue Criteria
title_sort validating the methods to process the stress path in multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criteria
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7796100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33406668
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14010206
work_keys_str_mv AT papugajan validatingthemethodstoprocessthestresspathinmultiaxialhighcyclefatiguecriteria
AT cizovaeva validatingthemethodstoprocessthestresspathinmultiaxialhighcyclefatiguecriteria
AT karolczukaleksander validatingthemethodstoprocessthestresspathinmultiaxialhighcyclefatiguecriteria