Cargando…
Validating the Methods to Process the Stress Path in Multiaxial High-Cycle Fatigue Criteria
The paper discusses one of the key features in the multiaxial fatigue strength evaluation—the procedure in which the stress path is analyzed to provide relevant measures of parameters required by multiaxial criteria. The selection of this procedure affects the complete equivalent stress derived for...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7796100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33406668 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14010206 |
_version_ | 1783634601488416768 |
---|---|
author | Papuga, Jan Cízová, Eva Karolczuk, Aleksander |
author_facet | Papuga, Jan Cízová, Eva Karolczuk, Aleksander |
author_sort | Papuga, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The paper discusses one of the key features in the multiaxial fatigue strength evaluation—the procedure in which the stress path is analyzed to provide relevant measures of parameters required by multiaxial criteria. The selection of this procedure affects the complete equivalent stress derived for any multiaxial load combinations. Three major concepts—the minimum circumscribed circle, minimum circumscribed ellipse, and moment of inertia methods—are described. Analytical solutions of their evaluation for multiaxial stress state with components described by harmonic functions are provided. The concepts are validated on available experimental data when included into six different multiaxial fatigue strength criteria. The results show that the moment of inertia results in too conservative results. Differences between both methods of circumscribed entities are much smaller. There are indications however that the minimum circumscribed ellipse solution works better for critical plane criteria and for the criteria based on stress tensor transformation into the Ilyushin deviatoric space. On the other hand, the minimum circumscribed ellipse solution tends to shift integral criteria to the conservative side. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7796100 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77961002021-01-10 Validating the Methods to Process the Stress Path in Multiaxial High-Cycle Fatigue Criteria Papuga, Jan Cízová, Eva Karolczuk, Aleksander Materials (Basel) Article The paper discusses one of the key features in the multiaxial fatigue strength evaluation—the procedure in which the stress path is analyzed to provide relevant measures of parameters required by multiaxial criteria. The selection of this procedure affects the complete equivalent stress derived for any multiaxial load combinations. Three major concepts—the minimum circumscribed circle, minimum circumscribed ellipse, and moment of inertia methods—are described. Analytical solutions of their evaluation for multiaxial stress state with components described by harmonic functions are provided. The concepts are validated on available experimental data when included into six different multiaxial fatigue strength criteria. The results show that the moment of inertia results in too conservative results. Differences between both methods of circumscribed entities are much smaller. There are indications however that the minimum circumscribed ellipse solution works better for critical plane criteria and for the criteria based on stress tensor transformation into the Ilyushin deviatoric space. On the other hand, the minimum circumscribed ellipse solution tends to shift integral criteria to the conservative side. MDPI 2021-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7796100/ /pubmed/33406668 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14010206 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Papuga, Jan Cízová, Eva Karolczuk, Aleksander Validating the Methods to Process the Stress Path in Multiaxial High-Cycle Fatigue Criteria |
title | Validating the Methods to Process the Stress Path in Multiaxial High-Cycle Fatigue Criteria |
title_full | Validating the Methods to Process the Stress Path in Multiaxial High-Cycle Fatigue Criteria |
title_fullStr | Validating the Methods to Process the Stress Path in Multiaxial High-Cycle Fatigue Criteria |
title_full_unstemmed | Validating the Methods to Process the Stress Path in Multiaxial High-Cycle Fatigue Criteria |
title_short | Validating the Methods to Process the Stress Path in Multiaxial High-Cycle Fatigue Criteria |
title_sort | validating the methods to process the stress path in multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criteria |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7796100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33406668 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14010206 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT papugajan validatingthemethodstoprocessthestresspathinmultiaxialhighcyclefatiguecriteria AT cizovaeva validatingthemethodstoprocessthestresspathinmultiaxialhighcyclefatiguecriteria AT karolczukaleksander validatingthemethodstoprocessthestresspathinmultiaxialhighcyclefatiguecriteria |