Cargando…

Comparison of Grip Strength in Recreational Climbers and Non-Climbing Athletes—A Cross-Sectional Study

In recent years, climbing sports is on the rise making its Olympic debut in 2021. Physiological traits of professional rock climbers have been intensively studied, while recreational indoor climbers are less investigated, especially regarding grip strength and upper extremity proportions. In this cr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Assmann, Mara, Steinmetz, Gino, Schilling, Arndt Friedrich, Saul, Dominik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7796164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33375452
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010129
_version_ 1783634617266339840
author Assmann, Mara
Steinmetz, Gino
Schilling, Arndt Friedrich
Saul, Dominik
author_facet Assmann, Mara
Steinmetz, Gino
Schilling, Arndt Friedrich
Saul, Dominik
author_sort Assmann, Mara
collection PubMed
description In recent years, climbing sports is on the rise making its Olympic debut in 2021. Physiological traits of professional rock climbers have been intensively studied, while recreational indoor climbers are less investigated, especially regarding grip strength and upper extremity proportions. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to understand what discerns the recreational climber from disparate recreational athletes. Therefore, we analyzed 50 recreational climbing (30.3 ± 12.7 years, 1.76 ± 0.09 m and 67.0 ± 14.0 kg) and 50 non-climbing athletes (26.4 ± 9.1 years, 1.78 ± 0.09 m and 73.2 ± 12.6 kg) to detect differences in their finger grip strength of seven different pinches. In addition, the upper extremity proportions were measured. Even in recreational climbers, almost all analyzed grips were stronger compared to other athletes (p < 0.05 in all but non-dominant fist, small to moderate effect sizes). Only the grip strength of the whole non-dominant hand was not significantly different (p = 0.17). Interestingly, differences between the dominant and non-dominant hand appeared to be larger in the non-climbing (all p < 0.05, all but one with small effect size) compared to the climbing cohort (pinch I/IV and pinch I/II+III+IV not different and mostly trivial). Circumference measurements showed that 10 cm below the lateral epicondyle, climbers exhibited significantly greater perimeter compared to non-climbing athletes (p < 0.05, small effect size). Our results show that recreational climbers have higher measured grip strength, but less profound differences between the dominant and non-dominant hand.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7796164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77961642021-01-10 Comparison of Grip Strength in Recreational Climbers and Non-Climbing Athletes—A Cross-Sectional Study Assmann, Mara Steinmetz, Gino Schilling, Arndt Friedrich Saul, Dominik Int J Environ Res Public Health Article In recent years, climbing sports is on the rise making its Olympic debut in 2021. Physiological traits of professional rock climbers have been intensively studied, while recreational indoor climbers are less investigated, especially regarding grip strength and upper extremity proportions. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to understand what discerns the recreational climber from disparate recreational athletes. Therefore, we analyzed 50 recreational climbing (30.3 ± 12.7 years, 1.76 ± 0.09 m and 67.0 ± 14.0 kg) and 50 non-climbing athletes (26.4 ± 9.1 years, 1.78 ± 0.09 m and 73.2 ± 12.6 kg) to detect differences in their finger grip strength of seven different pinches. In addition, the upper extremity proportions were measured. Even in recreational climbers, almost all analyzed grips were stronger compared to other athletes (p < 0.05 in all but non-dominant fist, small to moderate effect sizes). Only the grip strength of the whole non-dominant hand was not significantly different (p = 0.17). Interestingly, differences between the dominant and non-dominant hand appeared to be larger in the non-climbing (all p < 0.05, all but one with small effect size) compared to the climbing cohort (pinch I/IV and pinch I/II+III+IV not different and mostly trivial). Circumference measurements showed that 10 cm below the lateral epicondyle, climbers exhibited significantly greater perimeter compared to non-climbing athletes (p < 0.05, small effect size). Our results show that recreational climbers have higher measured grip strength, but less profound differences between the dominant and non-dominant hand. MDPI 2020-12-27 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7796164/ /pubmed/33375452 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010129 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Assmann, Mara
Steinmetz, Gino
Schilling, Arndt Friedrich
Saul, Dominik
Comparison of Grip Strength in Recreational Climbers and Non-Climbing Athletes—A Cross-Sectional Study
title Comparison of Grip Strength in Recreational Climbers and Non-Climbing Athletes—A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Comparison of Grip Strength in Recreational Climbers and Non-Climbing Athletes—A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Grip Strength in Recreational Climbers and Non-Climbing Athletes—A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Grip Strength in Recreational Climbers and Non-Climbing Athletes—A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Comparison of Grip Strength in Recreational Climbers and Non-Climbing Athletes—A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort comparison of grip strength in recreational climbers and non-climbing athletes—a cross-sectional study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7796164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33375452
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010129
work_keys_str_mv AT assmannmara comparisonofgripstrengthinrecreationalclimbersandnonclimbingathletesacrosssectionalstudy
AT steinmetzgino comparisonofgripstrengthinrecreationalclimbersandnonclimbingathletesacrosssectionalstudy
AT schillingarndtfriedrich comparisonofgripstrengthinrecreationalclimbersandnonclimbingathletesacrosssectionalstudy
AT sauldominik comparisonofgripstrengthinrecreationalclimbersandnonclimbingathletesacrosssectionalstudy