Cargando…

A study of patients’ quality of life more than 5 years after trauma: a prospective follow-up

BACKGROUND: The long-term fate of severely injured patients in terms of their quality of life is not well known. Our aim was to assess the quality of life of patients who have suffered moderate to severe trauma and to identify primary factors of long-term quality of life impairment. METHODS: A prosp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vardon-Bounes, Fanny, Gracia, Romain, Abaziou, Timothée, Crognier, Laure, Seguin, Thierry, Labaste, François, Geeraerts, Thomas, Georges, Bernard, Conil, Jean-Marie, Minville, Vincent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7796607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33419450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01652-1
_version_ 1783634719655591936
author Vardon-Bounes, Fanny
Gracia, Romain
Abaziou, Timothée
Crognier, Laure
Seguin, Thierry
Labaste, François
Geeraerts, Thomas
Georges, Bernard
Conil, Jean-Marie
Minville, Vincent
author_facet Vardon-Bounes, Fanny
Gracia, Romain
Abaziou, Timothée
Crognier, Laure
Seguin, Thierry
Labaste, François
Geeraerts, Thomas
Georges, Bernard
Conil, Jean-Marie
Minville, Vincent
author_sort Vardon-Bounes, Fanny
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The long-term fate of severely injured patients in terms of their quality of life is not well known. Our aim was to assess the quality of life of patients who have suffered moderate to severe trauma and to identify primary factors of long-term quality of life impairment. METHODS: A prospective monocentric study conducted on a number of patients who were victims of moderate to severe injuries during the year 2012. Patients were selected based on an Injury Severity Score (ISS) more than or equal to 9. Quality of life was assessed by the MOS SF-36 and NHP scores as a primary evaluation criterion. The secondary evaluation criteria were the determination of the socio-economic impact on quality of life and the identification of factors associated with disability. RESULTS: Two hundred and eight patients were contacted by e-mail or telephone. Fifty-five patients participated in this study (with a participation level of 26.4%), including 78.2% men, with a median age of 46. Significant alterations in quality of life were observed with the NHP and MOS SF-36 scale, including physical and psychological components. This resulted in a major socio-economic impact as 26% of the patients could not resume their professional activities (n = 10), 20% required retraining in other lines of work, and 36.4% had a disability status. The study showed that scores ≤ 85 on the physical functioning variable of the MOS SF 36 scale was associated with disability. CONCLUSION: More than five years after a moderate to severe injury, patients’ quality of life was significantly impacted, resulting in significant socio-economic consequences. Disability secondary to major trauma seems to be associated with a score ≤ 85 on the physical functioning dimension of the MOS SF-36 scale. This study raises the question of whether or not early rehabilitation programs should be implemented in order to limit the long-term impact of major trauma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7796607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77966072021-01-11 A study of patients’ quality of life more than 5 years after trauma: a prospective follow-up Vardon-Bounes, Fanny Gracia, Romain Abaziou, Timothée Crognier, Laure Seguin, Thierry Labaste, François Geeraerts, Thomas Georges, Bernard Conil, Jean-Marie Minville, Vincent Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The long-term fate of severely injured patients in terms of their quality of life is not well known. Our aim was to assess the quality of life of patients who have suffered moderate to severe trauma and to identify primary factors of long-term quality of life impairment. METHODS: A prospective monocentric study conducted on a number of patients who were victims of moderate to severe injuries during the year 2012. Patients were selected based on an Injury Severity Score (ISS) more than or equal to 9. Quality of life was assessed by the MOS SF-36 and NHP scores as a primary evaluation criterion. The secondary evaluation criteria were the determination of the socio-economic impact on quality of life and the identification of factors associated with disability. RESULTS: Two hundred and eight patients were contacted by e-mail or telephone. Fifty-five patients participated in this study (with a participation level of 26.4%), including 78.2% men, with a median age of 46. Significant alterations in quality of life were observed with the NHP and MOS SF-36 scale, including physical and psychological components. This resulted in a major socio-economic impact as 26% of the patients could not resume their professional activities (n = 10), 20% required retraining in other lines of work, and 36.4% had a disability status. The study showed that scores ≤ 85 on the physical functioning variable of the MOS SF 36 scale was associated with disability. CONCLUSION: More than five years after a moderate to severe injury, patients’ quality of life was significantly impacted, resulting in significant socio-economic consequences. Disability secondary to major trauma seems to be associated with a score ≤ 85 on the physical functioning dimension of the MOS SF-36 scale. This study raises the question of whether or not early rehabilitation programs should be implemented in order to limit the long-term impact of major trauma. BioMed Central 2021-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7796607/ /pubmed/33419450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01652-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Vardon-Bounes, Fanny
Gracia, Romain
Abaziou, Timothée
Crognier, Laure
Seguin, Thierry
Labaste, François
Geeraerts, Thomas
Georges, Bernard
Conil, Jean-Marie
Minville, Vincent
A study of patients’ quality of life more than 5 years after trauma: a prospective follow-up
title A study of patients’ quality of life more than 5 years after trauma: a prospective follow-up
title_full A study of patients’ quality of life more than 5 years after trauma: a prospective follow-up
title_fullStr A study of patients’ quality of life more than 5 years after trauma: a prospective follow-up
title_full_unstemmed A study of patients’ quality of life more than 5 years after trauma: a prospective follow-up
title_short A study of patients’ quality of life more than 5 years after trauma: a prospective follow-up
title_sort study of patients’ quality of life more than 5 years after trauma: a prospective follow-up
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7796607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33419450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01652-1
work_keys_str_mv AT vardonbounesfanny astudyofpatientsqualityoflifemorethan5yearsaftertraumaaprospectivefollowup
AT graciaromain astudyofpatientsqualityoflifemorethan5yearsaftertraumaaprospectivefollowup
AT abazioutimothee astudyofpatientsqualityoflifemorethan5yearsaftertraumaaprospectivefollowup
AT crognierlaure astudyofpatientsqualityoflifemorethan5yearsaftertraumaaprospectivefollowup
AT seguinthierry astudyofpatientsqualityoflifemorethan5yearsaftertraumaaprospectivefollowup
AT labastefrancois astudyofpatientsqualityoflifemorethan5yearsaftertraumaaprospectivefollowup
AT geeraertsthomas astudyofpatientsqualityoflifemorethan5yearsaftertraumaaprospectivefollowup
AT georgesbernard astudyofpatientsqualityoflifemorethan5yearsaftertraumaaprospectivefollowup
AT coniljeanmarie astudyofpatientsqualityoflifemorethan5yearsaftertraumaaprospectivefollowup
AT minvillevincent astudyofpatientsqualityoflifemorethan5yearsaftertraumaaprospectivefollowup
AT vardonbounesfanny studyofpatientsqualityoflifemorethan5yearsaftertraumaaprospectivefollowup
AT graciaromain studyofpatientsqualityoflifemorethan5yearsaftertraumaaprospectivefollowup
AT abazioutimothee studyofpatientsqualityoflifemorethan5yearsaftertraumaaprospectivefollowup
AT crognierlaure studyofpatientsqualityoflifemorethan5yearsaftertraumaaprospectivefollowup
AT seguinthierry studyofpatientsqualityoflifemorethan5yearsaftertraumaaprospectivefollowup
AT labastefrancois studyofpatientsqualityoflifemorethan5yearsaftertraumaaprospectivefollowup
AT geeraertsthomas studyofpatientsqualityoflifemorethan5yearsaftertraumaaprospectivefollowup
AT georgesbernard studyofpatientsqualityoflifemorethan5yearsaftertraumaaprospectivefollowup
AT coniljeanmarie studyofpatientsqualityoflifemorethan5yearsaftertraumaaprospectivefollowup
AT minvillevincent studyofpatientsqualityoflifemorethan5yearsaftertraumaaprospectivefollowup