Cargando…

The role of older patients’ goals in GP decision-making about medicines: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: To optimise medication use in older people, it is recommended that clinicians evaluate evidence on potential benefits and harms of medicines in light of the patients’ overall health, values and goals. This suggests general practitioners (GPs) should attempt to facilitate patient involvem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weir, Kristie Rebecca, Naganathan, Vasi, Carter, Stacy M., Tam, Chun Wah Michael, McCaffery, Kirsten, Bonner, Carissa, Rigby, Debbie, McLachlan, Andrew J., Jansen, Jesse
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7796626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33419389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01347-y
_version_ 1783634723763912704
author Weir, Kristie Rebecca
Naganathan, Vasi
Carter, Stacy M.
Tam, Chun Wah Michael
McCaffery, Kirsten
Bonner, Carissa
Rigby, Debbie
McLachlan, Andrew J.
Jansen, Jesse
author_facet Weir, Kristie Rebecca
Naganathan, Vasi
Carter, Stacy M.
Tam, Chun Wah Michael
McCaffery, Kirsten
Bonner, Carissa
Rigby, Debbie
McLachlan, Andrew J.
Jansen, Jesse
author_sort Weir, Kristie Rebecca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To optimise medication use in older people, it is recommended that clinicians evaluate evidence on potential benefits and harms of medicines in light of the patients’ overall health, values and goals. This suggests general practitioners (GPs) should attempt to facilitate patient involvement in decision-making. In practice this is often challenging. In this qualitative study, we explored GPs’ perspectives on the importance of discussing patients’ goals and preferences, and the role patient preferences play in medicines management and prioritisation. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs from Australia (n = 32). Participants were purposively sampled to recruit GPs with variation in experience level and geographic location. Transcribed audio-recordings of interviews were coded using Framework Analysis. RESULTS: The results showed that most GPs recognised some value in understanding older patients’ goals and preferences regarding their medicines. Most reported some discussions of goals and preferences with patients, but often this was initiated by the patient. Practical barriers were reported such as limited time during busy consultations to discuss issues beyond acute problems. GPs differed on the following main themes: 1) definition and perception of patients’ goals, 2) relationship with the patient, 3) approach to medicines management and prioritisation. We observed that GPs preferred one of three different practice patterns in their approach to patients’ goals in medicines decisions: 1) goals and preferences considered lower priority – ‘Directive’; 2) goals seen as central – ‘Goal-oriented’; 3) goals and preferences considered but not explicitly elicited – ‘Tacit’. CONCLUSIONS: This study explores how GPs differ in their approach to eliciting patients’ goals and preferences, and how these differences are operationalised in the context of older adults taking multiple medicines. Although there are challenges in providing care that aligns with patients’ goals and preferences, this study shows how complex decisions are made between GPs and their older patients in clinical practice. This work may inform future research that investigates how GPs can best incorporate the priorities of older people in decision-making around medicines. Developing practical support strategies may assist clinicians to involve patients in discussions about their medicines. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-020-01347-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7796626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77966262021-01-11 The role of older patients’ goals in GP decision-making about medicines: a qualitative study Weir, Kristie Rebecca Naganathan, Vasi Carter, Stacy M. Tam, Chun Wah Michael McCaffery, Kirsten Bonner, Carissa Rigby, Debbie McLachlan, Andrew J. Jansen, Jesse BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: To optimise medication use in older people, it is recommended that clinicians evaluate evidence on potential benefits and harms of medicines in light of the patients’ overall health, values and goals. This suggests general practitioners (GPs) should attempt to facilitate patient involvement in decision-making. In practice this is often challenging. In this qualitative study, we explored GPs’ perspectives on the importance of discussing patients’ goals and preferences, and the role patient preferences play in medicines management and prioritisation. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs from Australia (n = 32). Participants were purposively sampled to recruit GPs with variation in experience level and geographic location. Transcribed audio-recordings of interviews were coded using Framework Analysis. RESULTS: The results showed that most GPs recognised some value in understanding older patients’ goals and preferences regarding their medicines. Most reported some discussions of goals and preferences with patients, but often this was initiated by the patient. Practical barriers were reported such as limited time during busy consultations to discuss issues beyond acute problems. GPs differed on the following main themes: 1) definition and perception of patients’ goals, 2) relationship with the patient, 3) approach to medicines management and prioritisation. We observed that GPs preferred one of three different practice patterns in their approach to patients’ goals in medicines decisions: 1) goals and preferences considered lower priority – ‘Directive’; 2) goals seen as central – ‘Goal-oriented’; 3) goals and preferences considered but not explicitly elicited – ‘Tacit’. CONCLUSIONS: This study explores how GPs differ in their approach to eliciting patients’ goals and preferences, and how these differences are operationalised in the context of older adults taking multiple medicines. Although there are challenges in providing care that aligns with patients’ goals and preferences, this study shows how complex decisions are made between GPs and their older patients in clinical practice. This work may inform future research that investigates how GPs can best incorporate the priorities of older people in decision-making around medicines. Developing practical support strategies may assist clinicians to involve patients in discussions about their medicines. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-020-01347-y. BioMed Central 2021-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7796626/ /pubmed/33419389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01347-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Weir, Kristie Rebecca
Naganathan, Vasi
Carter, Stacy M.
Tam, Chun Wah Michael
McCaffery, Kirsten
Bonner, Carissa
Rigby, Debbie
McLachlan, Andrew J.
Jansen, Jesse
The role of older patients’ goals in GP decision-making about medicines: a qualitative study
title The role of older patients’ goals in GP decision-making about medicines: a qualitative study
title_full The role of older patients’ goals in GP decision-making about medicines: a qualitative study
title_fullStr The role of older patients’ goals in GP decision-making about medicines: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed The role of older patients’ goals in GP decision-making about medicines: a qualitative study
title_short The role of older patients’ goals in GP decision-making about medicines: a qualitative study
title_sort role of older patients’ goals in gp decision-making about medicines: a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7796626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33419389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01347-y
work_keys_str_mv AT weirkristierebecca theroleofolderpatientsgoalsingpdecisionmakingaboutmedicinesaqualitativestudy
AT naganathanvasi theroleofolderpatientsgoalsingpdecisionmakingaboutmedicinesaqualitativestudy
AT carterstacym theroleofolderpatientsgoalsingpdecisionmakingaboutmedicinesaqualitativestudy
AT tamchunwahmichael theroleofolderpatientsgoalsingpdecisionmakingaboutmedicinesaqualitativestudy
AT mccafferykirsten theroleofolderpatientsgoalsingpdecisionmakingaboutmedicinesaqualitativestudy
AT bonnercarissa theroleofolderpatientsgoalsingpdecisionmakingaboutmedicinesaqualitativestudy
AT rigbydebbie theroleofolderpatientsgoalsingpdecisionmakingaboutmedicinesaqualitativestudy
AT mclachlanandrewj theroleofolderpatientsgoalsingpdecisionmakingaboutmedicinesaqualitativestudy
AT jansenjesse theroleofolderpatientsgoalsingpdecisionmakingaboutmedicinesaqualitativestudy
AT weirkristierebecca roleofolderpatientsgoalsingpdecisionmakingaboutmedicinesaqualitativestudy
AT naganathanvasi roleofolderpatientsgoalsingpdecisionmakingaboutmedicinesaqualitativestudy
AT carterstacym roleofolderpatientsgoalsingpdecisionmakingaboutmedicinesaqualitativestudy
AT tamchunwahmichael roleofolderpatientsgoalsingpdecisionmakingaboutmedicinesaqualitativestudy
AT mccafferykirsten roleofolderpatientsgoalsingpdecisionmakingaboutmedicinesaqualitativestudy
AT bonnercarissa roleofolderpatientsgoalsingpdecisionmakingaboutmedicinesaqualitativestudy
AT rigbydebbie roleofolderpatientsgoalsingpdecisionmakingaboutmedicinesaqualitativestudy
AT mclachlanandrewj roleofolderpatientsgoalsingpdecisionmakingaboutmedicinesaqualitativestudy
AT jansenjesse roleofolderpatientsgoalsingpdecisionmakingaboutmedicinesaqualitativestudy